|
Replies: 30
| visibility 1
|
Orange Blooded [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11553
Joined: 11/30/95
|
Clemson Offense Up Almost 100 Yards Per Game
Nov 7, 2005, 10:47 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
null [1511]
TigerPulse: null%
Posts: 6965
Joined: 7/5/02
|
Holy ####......USC averages 590+ yds per game? And has
Nov 7, 2005, 10:55 AM
|
|
that large an improvement after God himself left them for the Titans?
Anyone know our per game scoring differential from last year?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zealot [704]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1648
Joined: 8/27/03
|
Bad Comparison
Nov 7, 2005, 11:01 AM
|
|
USC doesnt face the talented defenses we face. Not even close.
|
|
|
|
|
|
null [125]
TigerPulse: null%
Posts: 433
Joined: 7/11/05
|
Talent defense is such teams as Duke, Temple, and wake?***
Nov 7, 2005, 11:03 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64517]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88956
Joined: 3/27/01
|
Comparing Wake to Temple and Duke is just foolish.***
Nov 7, 2005, 11:04 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7650]
TigerPulse: 67%
Posts: 8306
Joined: 9/18/03
|
Re: Comparing Wake to Temple and Duke is just foolish.***
Nov 7, 2005, 11:06 AM
|
|
not really.. their records are similar..
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64517]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88956
Joined: 3/27/01
|
Wake beat Duke by 38 points.
Nov 7, 2005, 11:10 AM
|
|
Since when is a 4-6 record similar to 1-9 ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
null [125]
TigerPulse: null%
Posts: 433
Joined: 7/11/05
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64517]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88956
Joined: 3/27/01
|
Turnovers cost Clemson that game.***
Nov 7, 2005, 11:08 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
null [125]
TigerPulse: null%
Posts: 433
Joined: 7/11/05
|
Re: Turnovers cost Clemson that game.***
Nov 7, 2005, 11:12 AM
|
|
I think the fake FG was the reason. Clemson had the lead and then they tried the fake and that allowed Wake to have good field position and drive down the field
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64517]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88956
Joined: 3/27/01
|
I didn't agree with the call...
Nov 7, 2005, 11:13 AM
|
|
but I don't think it was the reason we lost. It should have never come down to that in the first place. If the OL doesn't miss its blocks on third down the game is over.
|
|
|
|
|
|
null [125]
TigerPulse: null%
Posts: 433
Joined: 7/11/05
|
Re: I didn't agree with the call...
Nov 7, 2005, 11:19 AM
|
|
The turnovers (the INT's by CW) happened in the first quarter. I can understand how that will effect the out outcome of the game, but it would have been smarting to go for the FG instead of faking it (Everyone praises how Jad Dean is the best in the country). Then that would have put Clemson up by 6 and then Clemson could kick off and Wake would have to drive a longer distance down the field. When they blocked that FG, it gave them the momentium and made them believe that they could win or tie. I guess it was a mixture of the offense playing crappy and bad play calling, but that game is in the past
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64517]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88956
Joined: 3/27/01
|
Becuae both turnovers led to Wake points.
Nov 7, 2005, 11:28 AM
|
|
and they didn't have to move the ball very far in order to score. We turned the ball over both times inside our own territory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zealot [704]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1648
Joined: 8/27/03
|
Wouldnt have even been in that postion
Nov 7, 2005, 11:14 AM
[ in reply to Re: Turnovers cost Clemson that game.*** ] |
|
if the players werent blowing coverage on Wakes WR all night. Tommy Bowden has put us into position to win every single game we have played this year. So get over it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
null [10]
TigerPulse: null%
Posts: 1
Joined: 12/1/02
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14429]
TigerPulse: 72%
Posts: 24902
Joined: 10/22/01
|
Maybe FSU, Miami, BC, A&M, GT, and NCST...
Nov 7, 2005, 11:06 AM
[ in reply to Talent defense is such teams as Duke, Temple, and wake?*** ] |
|
Yes, I said NCST, who has one of the best defenses in the nation, and we still torched them.
Please compare that to USC's schedule (I see Notre Dame. What else is there?)
|
|
|
|
|
|
null [125]
TigerPulse: null%
Posts: 433
Joined: 7/11/05
|
My bad...I didn't know you were talking about Southern Cal
Nov 7, 2005, 11:09 AM
|
|
I agree then, that Southern Cal hasn't played anyone with a good defense except ND
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4745]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8641
Joined: 2/7/02
|
South Carolina has only played one really good defense
Nov 7, 2005, 11:16 AM
|
|
and one above average defense, namely Alabama and Georgia.
Auburn is NOT a great defense (ask Ga tech), neither is Tennessee (ask ND).
Vandy, Kentucky, Troy, and UCF are not good defenses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
null [125]
TigerPulse: null%
Posts: 433
Joined: 7/11/05
|
Re: South Carolina has only played one really good defense
Nov 7, 2005, 11:22 AM
|
|
I disagree. Auburn has a better defense than you think. Vandy has a decent, not good one, and the rest you named dosn't have good defenses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4745]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8641
Joined: 2/7/02
|
You lost me on Vandy. If their defesne is good, then you
Nov 7, 2005, 11:54 AM
|
|
guys will have a very tough game this Saturday with Florida. They couldn't stop the Gators at all last Saturday.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14429]
TigerPulse: 72%
Posts: 24902
Joined: 10/22/01
|
|
|
|
|
|
null [125]
TigerPulse: null%
Posts: 433
Joined: 7/11/05
|
Re: You must have the coot aid to think the coots' O avg. 590+***
Nov 7, 2005, 11:23 AM
|
|
I didn't pay attention to that post. I know USC couldn't have avg 590+ a game
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [96798]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 29204
Joined: 9/14/05
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [96798]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 29204
Joined: 9/14/05
|
Wow 107th in Net Punting. Way down in punt returns and
Nov 7, 2005, 11:08 AM
|
|
kickoff returns also. We definitely miss Mr. Miller!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1903]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3519
Joined: 10/15/00
|
foolhardy to care about that stat after the Duke game,
Nov 7, 2005, 11:20 AM
|
|
Although it is important that our offense is improving, our numbers have risen dramatically in just 3 weeks with Duke and Temple. Those numbers will almost surely drop some after playing better defenses like FSU.
|
|
|
|
|
|
null [217]
TigerPulse: null%
Posts: 373
Joined: 2/12/02
|
Probably, but I think the improved offensive numbers
Nov 7, 2005, 11:25 AM
|
|
are also a product of a larger portion of Rob Spence's system being in place and the offense's comfortability with the playbook.
|
|
|
|
|
|
null [202]
TigerPulse: null%
Posts: 565
Joined: 11/1/05
|
Why do you have to be so negative? We are making obvious
Nov 7, 2005, 11:28 AM
[ in reply to foolhardy to care about that stat after the Duke game, ] |
|
improvements and under Bowden this team and this program are getting better and better, no need to tear down any of the accomplishments...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addict [415]
TigerPulse: 36%
Posts: 650
Joined: 4/1/05
|
Re: Clemson Offense Up Almost 100 Yards Per Game
Nov 7, 2005, 11:27 AM
|
|
and yet our overall record is soberingly similar to 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19352]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 22266
Joined: 4/25/04
|
and yet danny will never come back***
Nov 7, 2005, 11:34 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [54]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 76
Joined: 4/17/05
|
Re: and yet danny will never come back***
Nov 7, 2005, 4:12 PM
|
|
coach ford has been gone for over 15 years, he wont come back and its old news. people should stop talking about what we would do with him because we wont have him again
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2312]
TigerPulse: 69%
Posts: 3218
Joined: 11/15/04
|
AND WE'RE 5-4!!!!!!!!!!!***
Nov 7, 2005, 2:26 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 30
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
