|
Replies: 25
| visibility 1
|
Varsity [210]
TigerPulse: 71%
Posts: 562
Joined: 7/10/16
|
How is SCAR's recruiting class ahead of us on rivals?
Aug 19, 2016, 3:21 PM
|
|
Surely the system is flawed if this can happen just bc they have so many more commits
|
|
|
|
 |
MVP [547]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 702
Joined: 12/6/11
|
Re: How is SCAR's recruiting class ahead of us on rivals?
Aug 19, 2016, 3:22 PM
|
|
Wuuuuuuuuuuuut?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [33]
TigerPulse: 58%
Posts: 38
Joined: 11/25/10
|
Re: How is SCAR's recruiting class ahead of us on rivals?
Aug 19, 2016, 3:57 PM
|
|
they have 20 commits and we have 13 ... we will be fine with our 18-20 commits in feb
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3913]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3696
Joined: 11/27/03
|
quantity not quality***
Aug 19, 2016, 3:24 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [24687]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42349
Joined: 7/31/10
|
That will be corrected every November for the foreseeable
Aug 19, 2016, 3:30 PM
|
|
future. Perhaps Rivals will take note.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [23100]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 19803
Joined: 1/15/11
|
Average star rating looks better ?
Aug 19, 2016, 3:31 PM
|
|
|
|
20 bodies, they'll cheer . Clemson will take 19 with the over all average being about 3.9 - 4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [210]
TigerPulse: 71%
Posts: 562
Joined: 7/10/16
|
Re: Average star rating looks better ?
Aug 19, 2016, 3:33 PM
|
|
That is a mighty pretty star rating??
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [970]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2416
Joined: 4/2/10
|
Re: Average star rating looks better ?
Aug 19, 2016, 3:45 PM
[ in reply to Average star rating looks better ? ] |
|
The OP must be looking at a different ranking. The one you have shows us with the eleventh ranked team by points and the coots nineteenth. And that's with 7 fewer commits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [767]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 2217
Joined: 8/3/04
|
Re: How is SCAR's recruiting class ahead of us on rivals?
Aug 19, 2016, 3:31 PM
|
|
It's because their 3-star players are "SEC caliber", so that moves them up a few notches.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5249]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7625
Joined: 3/5/12
|
it ranks by total points
Aug 19, 2016, 3:33 PM
|
|
which isn't the best way to give a 'rank' as 20 commits will always beat 13 even if the actual talent won't. You can sort by Avg rating, and we're #2. Cawks are 21 by that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3962]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4972
Joined: 8/9/12
|
Re: How is SCAR's recruiting class ahead of us on rivals?
Aug 19, 2016, 3:36 PM
|
|
Pure numbers, 20 to 13. But we clearly have the better overall recruits. We would be top 3 with 20 commits right now. We don't just take anyone like they do now tho, that's the dif.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [629]
TigerPulse: 89%
Posts: 597
Joined: 9/29/11
|
foster
Aug 19, 2016, 3:43 PM
|
|
Can change all that
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [142]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 288
Joined: 10/2/12
|
Re: How is SCAR's recruiting class ahead of us on rivals?
Aug 19, 2016, 3:45 PM
|
|
Completely based off of quantity. Rivals factors in the top 20 commits from each school to find the school's total recruiting points ranking. So obviously a team with 19 or 20 commits is going to have more points than our 13 man class right now, don't worry, by February when our class is full we should be much higher, and Scar likely won't be in the top 25 (or at best a good 10+ spots behind us). We have/will have the much better class in 2017.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8244]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7565
Joined: 1/1/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [23100]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 19803
Joined: 1/15/11
|
Rivals has a glitch
Aug 19, 2016, 4:04 PM
|
|
It'll be straightened out soon.
Clemson is 11 on Rivals and USuC is 19.It's where both schools were before the glitch,it'll be where they are after it's straightened out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13036]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22353
Joined: 4/24/04
|
When i looked earlier we were going to pass Zona for
Aug 19, 2016, 4:07 PM
|
|
10th once Terrell was added. Everything got screwed up before that happened though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1045]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1212
Joined: 11/19/05
|
Is that ranking before or after Terrell?***
Aug 19, 2016, 4:29 PM
[ in reply to Rivals has a glitch ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13036]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22353
Joined: 4/24/04
|
Terrell's points never got added to our total and
Aug 19, 2016, 4:05 PM
|
|
it looks like Rivals is redoing their top 250 atm. Anyway, the ONLY way the coots will be ahead of us is through sheer numbers. However, they've already reached the threshold of 20 commits so the only way they can get more points now is by bumping off their lowest rated commit with someone better. We are only at 13/20 so our points could still increase significantly depending on how many the staff actually decided to sign this year (it's not going to be too many).
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1071]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 414
Joined: 11/26/10
|
Re: How is SCAR's recruiting class ahead of us on rivals?
Aug 19, 2016, 5:17 PM
|
|
What are you looking at? The Rivals rankings show the coots at 19 and Clemson at 11. How is that better?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1845]
TigerPulse: 83%
Posts: 2788
Joined: 12/14/15
|
Re: How is SCAR's recruiting class ahead of us on rivals?
Aug 19, 2016, 5:59 PM
|
|
LOL because most of those guys have watched as much tape as Ray Charles.
At least having them ranked ahead of us in August, in a recruiting ranking that isn't over til next year, will give them a little bit of hope to not give up and to actually follow football this year instead of drowning their sorrows in the parking lot city of Columbia
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6662]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9535
Joined: 1/16/99
|
Re: How is SCAR's recruiting class ahead of us on rivals?
Aug 19, 2016, 9:51 PM
|
|
check the star average and that says more than total points.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [235]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 569
Joined: 12/5/98
|
Re: How is SCAR's recruiting class ahead of us on rivals?
Aug 20, 2016, 10:17 AM
|
|
Their system is flawed as it's based on total points...click on avg. stars and we are #2,behind Ohio State. The average stars are the details that matter not whether someone had 20'recruits (SCjr)and someone only has 13 (Clemson).
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2/8/11
|
It's not flawed. Rivals is the most accurate.
Aug 20, 2016, 12:35 PM
|
|
Wait a couple of days. Clemson will be ranked in top ten.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11934]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16363
Joined: 11/30/98
|
I like Rivals the best of the services, but I hate the way
Aug 20, 2016, 2:52 PM
|
|
that "quantity" seems to be weighted so heavily in their calculations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [111389]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 73671
Joined: 9/10/03
|
Re: How is SCAR's recruiting class ahead of us on rivals?
Aug 20, 2016, 12:38 PM
|
|
it is not a bad class with 6 ESPN 300 recruits. The real question is what will boom do with these guys on offense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1286]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1093
Joined: 12/17/07
|
The game's afoot
Aug 20, 2016, 11:29 PM
|
|
Yesterday evening Rivals had us at 9 and our star average was 3.85
Rivals' 2017 Top 100 recruit ranking front page list is down
The Man is getting me down
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 25
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
