Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Here's a good article on COVID-19 Testing
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 8
| visibility 1,923

Here's a good article on COVID-19 Testing


Apr 17, 2020, 1:25 AM

The Data Is Wrong: Testing Doesn't Really Test COVID-19
by Enoch-Moore on Apr 04, 2020 in Health, Media Lies

Reposted from GlobalResearch.ca
https://www.globalresearch.ca/manufactured-pandemic-testing-people-any-strain-coronavirus-not-specifically-covid-19/5707781

By Julian Rose
Global Research, March 27, 2020
Manufactured Pandemic: Testing People for Any Strain of a Coronavirus, Not Specifically for COVID-19
Virus

The following is from a medical forum. The writer, who is a widely respected professional scientist in the US, prefers to stay anonymous, because presenting any narrative different than the official one can cause you a lot of stress in the toxic environment caused by the scam which surrounds COVID-19 these days. – Julian Rose

***

I work in the healthcare field. Here’s the problem, we are testing people for any strain of a Coronavirus. Not specifically for COVID-19. There are no reliable tests for a specific COVID-19 virus. There are no reliable agencies or media outlets for reporting numbers of actual COVID-19 virus cases. This needs to be addressed first and foremost. Every action and reaction to COVID-19 is based on totally flawed data and we simply can not make accurate assessments.

This is why you’re hearing that most people with COVID-19 are showing nothing more than cold/flu like symptoms. That’s because most Coronavirus strains are nothing more than cold/flu like symptoms. The few actual novel Coronavirus cases do have some worse respiratory responses, but still have a very promising recovery rate, especially for those without prior issues.

The ‘gold standard’ in testing for COVID-19 is laboratory isolated/purified coronavirus particles free from any contaminants and particles that look like viruses but are not, that have been proven to be the cause of the syndrome known as COVID-19 and obtained by using proper viral isolation methods and controls (not the PCR that is currently being used or Serology /antibody tests which do not detect virus as such). PCR basically takes a sample of your cells and amplifies any DNA to look for ‘viral sequences’, i.e. bits of non-human DNA that seem to match parts of a known viral genome.

The problem is the test is known not to work.

It uses ‘amplification’ which means taking a very very tiny amount of DNA and growing it exponentially until it can be analyzed. Obviously any minute contaminations in the sample will also be amplified leading to potentially gross errors of discovery.

Additionally, it’s only looking for partial viral sequences, not whole genomes, so identifying a single pathogen is next to impossible even if you ignore the other issues.

The New Coronavirus Outbreak, COVID-19, Sounds Menacing and Is
The Mickey Mouse test kits being sent out to hospitals, at best, tell analysts you have some viral DNA in your cells. Which most of us do, most of the time. It may tell you the viral sequence is related to a specific type of virus – say the huge family of coronavirus. But that’s all. The idea these kits can isolate a specific virus like COVID-19 is nonsense.

And that’s not even getting into the other issue – viral load.

If you remember the PCR works by amplifying minute amounts of DNA. It therefore is useless at telling you how much virus you may have. And that’s the only question that really matters when it comes to diagnosing illness. Everyone will have a few virus kicking round in their system at any time, and most will not cause illness because their quantities are too small. For a virus to sicken you you need a lot of it, a massive amount of it. But PCR does not test viral load and therefore can’t determine if it is present in sufficient quantities to sicken you.

If you feel sick and get a PCR test any random virus DNA might be identified even if they aren’t at all involved in your sickness which leads to false diagnosis.

And coronavirus are incredibly common. A large percentage of the world human population will have covi DNA in them in small quantities even if they are perfectly well or sick with some other pathogen.

Do you see where this is going yet? If you want to create a totally false panic about a totally false pandemic – pick a coronavirus.

They are incredibly common and there’s tons of them. A very high percentage of people who have become sick by other means (flu, bacterial pneumonia, anything) will have a positive

PCR tests for covi even if you’re doing them properly and ruling out contamination, simply because covis are so common.

There are hundreds of thousands of flu and pneumonia victims in hospitals throughout the world at any one time.

All you need to do is select the sickest of these in a single location – say Wuhan – administer PCR tests to them and claim anyone showing viral sequences similar to a coronavirus (which will inevitably be quite a few) is suffering from a ‘new’ disease.

Since you already selected the sickest flu cases a fairly high proportion of your sample will go on to die.

You can then say this ‘new’ virus has a CFR higher than the flu and use this to infuse more concern and do more tests which will of course produce more ‘cases’, which expands the testing, which produces yet more ‘cases’ and so on and so on.

Before long you have your ‘pandemic’, and all you have done is use a simple test kit trick to convert the worst flu and pneumonia cases into something new that doesn’t actually exist.

Now just run the same scam in other countries. Making sure to keep the fear message running high so that people will feel panicky and less able to think critically.

Your only problem is going to be that – due to the fact there is no actual new deadly pathogen but just regular sick people, you are mislabeling your case numbers, and especially your deaths, are going to be way too low for a real new deadly virus pandemic.

But you can stop people pointing this out in several ways.

1. You can claim this is just the beginning and more deaths are imminent. Use this as an excuse to quarantine everyone and then claim the quarantine prevented the expected millions of dead.

2. You can tell people that ‘minimizing’ the dangers is irresponsible and bully them into not talking about numbers.

3. You can talk crap about made up numbers hoping to blind people with pseudoscience.

4. You can start testing well people (who, of course, will also likely have shreds of coronavirus DNA in them) and thus inflate your ‘case figures’ with ‘asymptomatic carriers’ (you will of course have to spin that to sound deadly even though any virologist knows the more symptom-less cases you have the less deadly is your pathogen.

Take these 4 simple steps and you can have your own entirely manufactured pandemic up and running in weeks.

They can not “confirm” something for which there is no accurate test.


covid19, FakePandemic
ADD COMMENT
Name
E-mail
Comment
5+5 =
Defending Utah
© 2020

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Here's a good article on COVID-19 Testing


Apr 17, 2020, 7:37 AM

would i be correct in calling bull**** on this? Yes, I think I would.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Here's a good article on COVID-19 Testing


Apr 17, 2020, 7:48 AM

I am not a virologist or play one on TV, so I can't say he is wrong about the accuracy of the tests, but the number of deaths doesn't correspond to an average Coronavirus or flu.

2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Here's a good article on COVID-19 Testing


Aug 10, 2021, 12:21 PM [ in reply to Re: Here's a good article on COVID-19 Testing ]

This is false. They have markers specific to SARS-Cov-2 on these tests.

Coronavirus, not SARS-Cov-2, is not widespread anyway, so even if this WAS true, which it isn't, the numbers wouldn't be inflated. There aren't thousands of people walking around with other coronavirus strains.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Absolutely you would. It’s patently false and ignorant


Apr 17, 2020, 9:16 AM [ in reply to Re: Here's a good article on COVID-19 Testing ]

As a physician whose training involved performing pcr, I can say he’s both ignorant to the mechanism of disease and the testing he’s purporting to understand.


Message was edited by: tigerpathmd®


2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Here's a good article on COVID-19 Testing


Apr 17, 2020, 7:41 AM

Same viral family , same way we test for different flu strains or herpes types .

Nothing of note here .

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

DB23


Re: Here's a good article on COVID-19 Testing


Apr 17, 2020, 8:33 AM

I should've left out the word 'good' I suppose. I'll cut and paste a different one later.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Admirable this heroic scientist wants to be anonymous


Apr 17, 2020, 7:43 AM

He should give a speech at Smithfield plant in South Dakota

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Here's the source... Get a taste...


Apr 17, 2020, 9:33 AM

https://www.defendingutah.org/author/Ben-McClintock?name=ben-mcclintock&name=ben-mcclintock&name=ben-mcclintock&name=ben-mcclintock&name=ben-mcclintock&page=5

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Replies: 8
| visibility 1,923
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic