»
Topic: Gallman or a healthy Zac Brooks
Replies: 29   Last Post: Oct 17, 2015 8:24 PM by: Carlsbad®
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.


[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 29  

Gallman or a healthy Zac Brooks


Posted: Oct 11, 2015 2:49 PM
 

Curious? I have mad respect for Gallman, but I would take a healthy Zac Brooks over Gallman any day. It seems we have more depth at running back than leaving Gallman in the for the entire games. Heck, I'm just a fan, I'm just not sold on Gallman being the workhorse. Thoughts?


Re: Gallman or a healthy Zac Brooks

[2]
Posted: Oct 11, 2015 2:52 PM
 

I have been impressed with brooks but gallman is a stud and much better.


Gallman hands down...

[3]
Posted: Oct 11, 2015 2:53 PM
 

Brooks is a good #2 though.


Dude is the definition of a workhorse.

[2]
Posted: Oct 11, 2015 2:54 PM
 

One that takes care of the ball to boot.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg

There's no such thing as a stupid question, just stupid people who ask questions.


Not sure where the evidence is to support Brooks > Gallman


Posted: Oct 11, 2015 3:05 PM
 

IMO Gallman continues to put all the other RBs currently on the squad firmly in his rear view mirror.

Honestly, I think Gallman will perhaps end up playing "James Davis" to Tavian Feaster's "CJ Spiller" the next couple of years, but I can't see Gallman losing significant carries to Brooks at any point.

I do think that having a healthy Brooks for the remainder of 2015 is great for our depth at the position and find it mysterious that CJ Davidson was getting the #2 carries for so much of the early part of the schedule.

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg

Re: Gallman or a healthy Zac Brooks


Posted: Oct 11, 2015 3:06 PM
 

Gallman. He's reliable and versatile. Brooks is great as a #2, especially as a receiver out of the backfield.


Re: Gallman or a healthy Zac Brooks

[1]
Posted: Oct 11, 2015 3:16 PM
 

Nice first post.

Way to set the bar low. I guess you can only improve from this idiocy.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

null


^^^This^^^***


Posted: Oct 17, 2015 8:17 PM
 



2020 purple level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

I for one am glad you are stopping. You are one of the most ignorant posters ever. You obviously think very highly of your own opinion, unlike the rest of us - RockHillTiger


Re: Gallman or a healthy Zac Brooks


Posted: Oct 17, 2015 8:20 PM
 

And you're an idiot . How you feel now?


Re: Gallman or a healthy Zac Brooks


Posted: Oct 11, 2015 3:20 PM
 

One of those coot "drive-bys" looking to stir the pot. No point in responding to the dumba$$ question.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg

Re: Gallman or a healthy Zac Brooks


Posted: Oct 17, 2015 8:21 PM
 

How you feel now idiot?


Gallman easily over Brooks

[2]
Posted: Oct 11, 2015 3:22 PM
 

Not even close.


Re: Gallman or a healthy Zac Brooks

[1]
Posted: Oct 11, 2015 3:42 PM
 

How can you even make that statement.


Re: Gallman or a healthy Zac Brooks

[1]
Posted: Oct 17, 2015 8:16 PM
 

I told you you idiot


Re: Gallman or a healthy Zac Brooks

[1]
Posted: Oct 11, 2015 5:10 PM
 

What kind of question is that? My friends tell me I'm crazy, but I think Gallman has been the best player on the entire offense so far. I'd give a couple players on defense the MVP right now.


No way. Gallman with Brooks the clear #2.***


Posted: Oct 11, 2015 5:39 PM
 



2020 white level member

Uhh.. we've got both

[1]
Posted: Oct 11, 2015 5:55 PM
 

and they both saw the endzone..

What's the prob?


Re: Gallman or a healthy Zac Brooks


Posted: Oct 11, 2015 5:58 PM
 

Are you out of your mind? Gallman is a beast.


GTFO***

[2]
Posted: Oct 11, 2015 6:10 PM
 



badge-donor-05yr.jpg

Like salt and pepper


Posted: Oct 11, 2015 7:58 PM
 

need a little of both


They are a great 1 2 punch. One of the best

[1]
Posted: Oct 11, 2015 9:06 PM
 

Combos in the ACC now that Zac is 100 percent


great combo***


Posted: Oct 17, 2015 8:19 PM
 



2020 white level member

Is It Medicinal or Did You Buy It Off The Street?

[2]
Posted: Oct 11, 2015 9:11 PM
 

my guess is it's bad, whatever it is. GALLMAN

2020 purple level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

I for one am glad you are stopping. You are one of the most ignorant posters ever. You obviously think very highly of your own opinion, unlike the rest of us - RockHillTiger


Gallman with a healthy Zac Brooks for backup!


Posted: Oct 11, 2015 11:01 PM
 

I would like to see them pass to Zac a couple of times a game in addition to his vastly improved running!

military_donation.jpg

I've always thought 24 should be getting more


Posted: Oct 12, 2015 2:04 AM
 

reps. Impresses just about every time he touches the ball and had impressive speed on that run to the endzone.

Gallman still number one, Brooks a close second. I'm not sure what Davidson is even doing in the lineup.

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Apples and oranges***


Posted: Oct 17, 2015 8:18 PM
 




Leathal combo. Zach for catching out the backfield and


Posted: Oct 17, 2015 8:18 PM
 

speed. Gallman to pound the rock on tired defenses

2020 white level member

Re: Gallman or a healthy Zac Brooks


Posted: Oct 17, 2015 8:21 PM
 

Gallman is the workhorse. It's nice to spell him early in the game. So when it's late and the defense is tired he can run down their throat.

military_donation.jpg

Re: Gallman or a healthy Zac Brooks


Posted: Oct 17, 2015 8:21 PM
 

Zac Brooks in more of a Andre Ellington type back while Gallman is like Reggie Merriweather. Both very good and provide a nice one two punch and change of pace.

2020 student level member

Brad Brownell: more losses than any other coach in school history.


Also,


Posted: Oct 17, 2015 8:24 PM
 

Brooks has always been known to have great hands catching the ball out of the backfield.

2020 white level member

Replies: 29  

TIGER TICKETS

FB GAME: Season Tickets
FOR SALE: SEASON TICKETS FOR 2021 Lower Deck Section T, row 18, seats 5 & 7, plus a parking pass. $1900

Buy or Sell CU Tickets and More in Tiger Tickets!

[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
2924 people have read this post