»
Topic: Does this hurt us
Replies: 17   Last Post: Oct 6, 2019 8:01 AM by: wewillROCKyou
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.


[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 17  

Does this hurt us

[1]
Posted: Oct 5, 2019 11:05 PM
 

Come 2023 when players can start getting paid. I mean we won the natty 2 out of the last 4 years and have made the playoffs 4 years straight and even won the acc 4 years start but we only rank 25th in revenue out of other teams. Link in the the next post. Anyways GO TIGERS!!!


Re: Does this hurt us

[1]
Posted: Oct 5, 2019 11:06 PM
 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/chrissmith/2019/09/12/college-football-most-valuable-clemson-texas-am/amp/


How on earth are South Carolina and Arkansas in there??***


Posted: Oct 6, 2019 12:42 AM
 




Re: Does this hurt us


Posted: Oct 5, 2019 11:10 PM
 

If players start getting paid, we are screwed.


We are doomed

[1]
Posted: Oct 6, 2019 12:03 AM
 

Don’t you think they’ll be a cap on how much they get paid?

It’s not going to be a wide open bidding war

2019 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: We are doomed


Posted: Oct 6, 2019 12:21 AM
 

They might try a cap, but the premise seems to be the individual's right to monetize something of value he owns in a free market. If the courts rule along those lines, why would they allow a cap? Seems the courts would say the market determines how much someone can make off what he essentially owns the rights to.

I believe it's all over. Usher in the era of big-headed egomaniacal college kids building mansions & driving Lamborghinis.

2019 orange level member


Re: We are doomed


Posted: Oct 6, 2019 12:47 AM
 

Just because it is legal, doesn't mean the NCAA has to let you play.


Right now the whole system is about being fair and equal


Posted: Oct 6, 2019 12:53 AM
 

Everyone gets 85 scholarships.

There is no way the schools outside of the top 10 in revenue would be in support of this.

I see a cap so wealthy schools don’t have an unfair advantage

2019 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: We are doomed


Posted: Oct 6, 2019 8:01 AM
 

And how many teams are going to able to make sure their top 22 players reach that camp? Their top 44? Their whole team?


Re: Does this hurt us


Posted: Oct 6, 2019 12:40 AM
 

I wonder if that’s why Dabo is against it, is because he knows we don’t have the money to buy the big recruits year in and year out. And if we don’t win nattys and don’t make the playoffs then we really won’t have the money and it’ll crash fast. I’m a HVAC tech and don’t know anything when it comes to this stuff be that’s what it seems like to me. Am I wrong in this assumption? Anyways GO TIGERS!!!


no Dabo is against it because he wants the kids to go to


Posted: Oct 6, 2019 6:54 AM
 

college and get an education.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg


The thing is, kids will leave California in droves


Posted: Oct 5, 2019 11:13 PM
 

for example, let's say a 5 star QB from Cali is going to get $100,000. How long is that going to last in Los Angeles vs Tuscaloosa?

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg


we better REALLY enjoy the next 3 years of college football.***


Posted: Oct 6, 2019 12:05 AM
 




Re: we better REALLY enjoy the next 3 years of college football.***

[1]
Posted: Oct 6, 2019 12:58 AM
 

The Cali bill is about endorsements. Only top players are going to get enough to amount to anything, anyeay, and they're going to need to go to major schools to have the kind of visibility that gets them noticed and brings those endorsements. The schools themselves don't have to pay the players any more than the NCAA allows under the Cali law I think the bill is bad for the sport, but not so bad as to totally ruin it. If it were to get to the point that schools themselves had to pay, though, I don't see the sport surviving, and if football dies, all the non-revenue sports are dead,too.

2019 white level member

Nothing prevents rich boosters from "endorsing" high

[1]
Posted: Oct 6, 2019 6:56 AM
 

school prospects through the kid's agent and making it a 4 year deal for signing with "x-rich" school

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg


Re: Does this hurt us


Posted: Oct 6, 2019 6:32 AM
 

Maybe I am reading this whole thing wrong, and if I am please someone send me a T-mail telling me so.
This California proposal is not about paying the players to play, but paying them for revenue that is generated by selling their images, or getting an endorsement to sponsor them (like Zion Williamson got under the table from Nike).


Re: Does this hurt us


Posted: Oct 6, 2019 6:44 AM
 

Does that mean he should hold out until 2023?

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Does this hurt us


Posted: Oct 6, 2019 7:01 AM
 

players cannot "get paid" in 2023. players can get compensated for use of their likenesses in California. the world isn't going to come to an end. companies will simply stop using their likenesses, just like they did in Madden when the courts ruled Madden couldn't use player's likenesses without compensation.


Replies: 17  

TIGER TICKETS

FB GAME: ACC Championship
FOR SALE: 2 tickets in 546. Mobile transfer via Ticketmaster lowest price on Ticketmaster

Buy or Sell CU Tickets and More in Tiger Tickets!

[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
2264 people have read this post