|
Replies: 29
| visibility 1
|
Recruit [97]
TigerPulse: 70%
Posts: 163
Joined: 9/8/16
|
Did we recruit Zach Bailey?
Dec 29, 2016, 3:30 PM
|
|
As much as I hate the coots, that guy is a mauler on their OLine. He would have looked good in orange
|
|
|
|
 |
Asst Coach [745]
TigerPulse: 86%
Posts: 948
Joined: 10/31/13
|
Re: Did we recruit Zach Bailey?
Dec 29, 2016, 3:34 PM
|
|
We did .. heavily .. but his he has a lot of Coot relatives ... too bad for him
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [111566]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 73750
Joined: 9/10/03
|
Re: Did we recruit Zach Bailey?
Dec 29, 2016, 3:35 PM
|
|
nice try coot
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [25962]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 20635
Joined: 7/31/07
|
Re: Did we recruit Zach Bailey?
Dec 29, 2016, 3:41 PM
|
|
Yep and he chose to be a chicken. His college career is half over, or maybe 2/3, and he has won nothing. Very poor decision on his part.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [97]
TigerPulse: 70%
Posts: 163
Joined: 9/8/16
|
Re: Did we recruit Zach Bailey?
Dec 29, 2016, 3:42 PM
|
|
some just will never learn
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [28393]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14061
Joined: 6/27/14
|
Re: Did we recruit Zach Bailey?
Dec 29, 2016, 4:01 PM
|
|
btw coot, we don't really recruit against usuck. might want to check your recruiting service subscription
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1627]
TigerPulse: 66%
Posts: 2079
Joined: 12/29/15
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [97]
TigerPulse: 70%
Posts: 163
Joined: 9/8/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [54011]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 21055
Joined: 11/6/14
|
I believed he called you a coot.
Dec 29, 2016, 3:45 PM
|
|
Probably because of you display of ignorance regarding Clemson recruiting and you zealousness to compliment a coot.
Try not to show your feathers next time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [97]
TigerPulse: 70%
Posts: 163
Joined: 9/8/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6662]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9535
Joined: 1/16/99
|
Re: Did we recruit Zach Bailey?
Dec 29, 2016, 3:45 PM
|
|
LOL as good as you clowns think Bailey is, he still wouldn't start at Clemson. Kinda puts it all in perspective, huh.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1654]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 3508
Joined: 11/18/01
|
he would start at Clemson too. He is their best player and
Dec 29, 2016, 3:51 PM
|
|
Will play 10+ years in the league. I can see that through my orange colored glasses
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6662]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9535
Joined: 1/16/99
|
Re: he would start at Clemson too. He is their best player and
Dec 29, 2016, 3:59 PM
|
|
Has nothing to do with orange colored glasses. He would not start at Clemson. Period. Maybe you shouldn't be looking through the garnet glasses so much. Having that one last beer put you over the top.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1845]
TigerPulse: 83%
Posts: 2788
Joined: 12/14/15
|
Re: he would start at Clemson too. He is their best player and
Dec 29, 2016, 4:10 PM
|
|
He would be the starting LG over Hearn. He's the only player on that team that would play at Clemson
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6662]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9535
Joined: 1/16/99
|
Re: he would start at Clemson too. He is their best player and
Dec 29, 2016, 4:44 PM
|
|
Since we will never know, it's easy to say but Hearn is our starter on a 12-1 team and Bailey is....... Not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1845]
TigerPulse: 83%
Posts: 2788
Joined: 12/14/15
|
Re: he would start at Clemson too. He is their best player and
Dec 29, 2016, 4:50 PM
|
|
That mindset got me in trouble on this board with all of the people who try to predict the future and give "what-if" scenarios. I've always been told that's exactly what a sports discussion board is for
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1845]
TigerPulse: 83%
Posts: 2788
Joined: 12/14/15
|
Re: he would start at Clemson too. He is their best player and
Dec 29, 2016, 4:51 PM
[ in reply to Re: he would start at Clemson too. He is their best player and ] |
|
But fair point, and I'm glad we have Hearn on this back to back playoff team, back to back ACC champions, and potential national champions. Can't feel bad for Zach
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [28393]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14061
Joined: 6/27/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6937]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 22594
Joined: 5/4/03
|
Re: The only one that I would have is Hurst and he would be
Dec 29, 2016, 3:51 PM
|
|
a back up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7718]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7444
Joined: 1/10/16
|
Re: Did we recruit Zach Bailey?
Dec 29, 2016, 3:52 PM
|
|
Yes we did but you already knew that Chicken boy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6676]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 9738
Joined: 9/22/11
|
Yes, he had hard time making up his mind. Lots of pressure
Dec 29, 2016, 3:53 PM
|
|
in lower state to become a coot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [36450]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18324
Joined: 12/6/13
|
Tell'em Coot!
Dec 29, 2016, 3:54 PM
|
|
SMFH still shaking it
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2053]
TigerPulse: 93%
Posts: 1493
Joined: 10/27/16
|
Yay, the Gamecocks have a player that could possibly
Dec 29, 2016, 3:54 PM
|
|
play for Clemson.
THIS IS HUGE NEWS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [54011]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 21055
Joined: 11/6/14
|
It's slow over there.
Dec 29, 2016, 3:56 PM
|
|
Where you been all day?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2053]
TigerPulse: 93%
Posts: 1493
Joined: 10/27/16
|
Working like a poor
Dec 29, 2016, 3:58 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [54011]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 21055
Joined: 11/6/14
|
Time to drag that desk again.***
Dec 29, 2016, 4:00 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6662]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9535
Joined: 1/16/99
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7718]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7444
Joined: 1/10/16
|
Re: Yay, the Gamecocks have a player that could possibly
Dec 29, 2016, 4:02 PM
|
|
Dude Bailey would play here. He is a very talented guy there is a reason we recruited him as hard as we did.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [919]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1026
Joined: 11/28/14
|
Who?
Dec 29, 2016, 4:46 PM
|
|
Must be kin to Ulrich.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10871]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12937
Joined: 4/18/12
|
Re: Did we recruit Zach Bailey?
Dec 29, 2016, 4:59 PM
|
|
I don't know what that kid was thinking. I guess, he clearly wasn't. Family or someone must've been in his ear.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 29
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
