Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Coot said we lose way too much to compete next year
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 26
| visibility 1

Coot said we lose way too much to compete next year


Dec 2, 2013, 10:36 PM

Yeah not like they lose anyone good huh? Clowney, Shaw, Quarrels, Hampton. Just 4 of their 5 best players

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Coot said we lose way too much to compete next year


Dec 2, 2013, 10:39 PM

Both fan bases have been saying that about the other school; I expect us both to be good again.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Coot said we lose way too much to compete next year


Dec 2, 2013, 10:44 PM

Unfotunately, they will not have the luxury of teams having to double and triple team the left side as they had to do with Clowney on that side. They also lose Sutton on the other side. Three of four on D-line and two corners are gone (Hampton, Legree). Their D will be a shell of what it is now.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Coot said we lose way too much to compete next year


Dec 2, 2013, 10:50 PM

I guess we'll see, won't we.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

really? according to this board


Dec 2, 2013, 10:42 PM

Clowney sucks, right? Thompson is a proven replacement for Shaw. Quarlea and Hampton are aolid but we have depth there. Yo

Clemson loses a record setting QB, All-American WR, starting RB, leading sack specialist, and amazing kicker. Im sure yall have depth too but you lose more key guys as a whole.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

SCjr loses 3 of 4 starting DL, both CB's


Dec 2, 2013, 10:49 PM

best QB in school history. Clemson loses arguably best QB in school history, top ten pick in Watkins, good LT in Thomas, and replacable starters in LB's Christian and Shuey, CB Robinson, OG Shatley. Beasley leaving is not a given at this point, but if he does, Shaq Lawson steps in and we don't miss a beat. Pretty even if you ask me. And you are not replacing those 3 starters on the DL, 2 of which could be 1st round picks and Sutton who will get drafted with players anywhere close to their pedigree

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Chad Kelly will be difficult much like Shaw is with his feet


Dec 3, 2013, 12:28 AM

I haven't seen much with regards to the way he throws.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Chad Kelly will be difficult much like Shaw is with his feet


Dec 3, 2013, 12:33 AM

Been saying it for a while now, Kelly will never see the field as a start unless there is an injury to Stoudt or Watson.

It always sucks to see a player of his caliber relegated to a backup but I don't think there is a doubt in anyone's mind that Watson is the future of the program, not Kelly.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Thompson had one good game. Did you see him vs Mizzu


Dec 2, 2013, 10:50 PM [ in reply to really? according to this board ]

Clemson will be better at RB next year than this. WR will be just fine with good bit of talent. Think Chad Kelly and Watson are more of a fit for this offense. Vic Beasley hasn't said he is leaving, but Lawson is a stud and will be great replacement if he does go.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

With Thompson at QB, their offense will have to be


Dec 2, 2013, 10:53 PM

totally different than with Shaw. Shaw bailed them out countless times and IMO is their best QB ever, not even close

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Feels like a clean slate for a lot of teams next season...


Dec 2, 2013, 10:44 PM

We'll know where we're at with UGA away, and usc vs tamu...

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Feels like a clean slate for a lot of teams next season...


Dec 2, 2013, 11:01 PM

I didn't realize that you guys were playing UGA again next year. That's good. It was always a great rivalry, it's good to see that it isn't a total casualty of the new conference alignments.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

If the coots lost Mike Davis would they be worried


Dec 2, 2013, 10:45 PM

No because the have proven depth there. WR,QB,DE are areas of proven depth for Clemson. Not so sure about SCAR

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Thompson is proven depth fro them at QB


Dec 2, 2013, 10:51 PM

where they will really feel the hit is on the DL, where other than Philip Dukes the guys they have moving up are no where near the pedigree of Clowney, Quarles and Sutton. Losing both corners as well. No proven pass rush plus new corners equals a big question marks on defense

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Coot said we lose way too much to compete next year


Dec 2, 2013, 10:49 PM

Coots lose shaw quarrels and clowney but quarrels is just fat and clowney sucks. And a lot of other people graduate so there going to suck next year

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Coot said we lose way too much to compete next year***


Dec 2, 2013, 10:55 PM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


It's safe to say losing Shaw and


Dec 2, 2013, 10:58 PM

Clowney is huge . Thompson played a few games this year and the offense was not the same. Whoever backs up Thompson will be inserted sooner rather than later. I think Clemson will use Stoudt and Kelly at QB.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"We establish no religion in this country, we mandate no belief. Nor will we ever. Church and state are, and must remain, separate." ~Ronald Reagan


Quarles will have an immediate replacement


Dec 2, 2013, 11:08 PM

Who might prove to be really stout

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

So what? The guys we had


Dec 2, 2013, 11:29 PM

didn't compete with them for the past five years. Time for a different team with different attitude.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Most Clemson fans are ready to


Dec 2, 2013, 11:34 PM

See the read option used. Tajh was not a great read option QB. His longest tun was 23 yards .

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"We establish no religion in this country, we mandate no belief. Nor will we ever. Church and state are, and must remain, separate." ~Ronald Reagan


Re: Coot said we lose way too much to compete next year


Dec 2, 2013, 11:42 PM

Shaw and the DL will be the toughest to replace. Not so worried about quarles because kelsy griffin is the real deal. Our ends take a step back. English could be good. Has beasly type explosiveness but looks like a tall safety. Needs to hit the weights hard. Dixon seems to have a nose for the ball but has some physical limitations. Our freshmen linebackers should be better in year two so that will help.

On offense, the line will be above average, still have 3 te who can play, and all the receivers are back. QB will be the question. I am dure its dylans job to lose but won't be surprised if nosovitch or mitch make a run for the job. Nosovitch is another true dual threat. Mike davis, even though yall shut him down, is very good and will get the ball a lot. May take a step back a little but it won't be much unlesswe cant get a qb going.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I'm ready to see


Dec 2, 2013, 11:45 PM

What Abu brings to the table at DT

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Bottom line


Dec 2, 2013, 11:55 PM

Clemson will have talent advantage for the first time in several years over Scar.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"We establish no religion in this country, we mandate no belief. Nor will we ever. Church and state are, and must remain, separate." ~Ronald Reagan


Re: Bottom line


Dec 3, 2013, 12:00 AM

Spurrier-"We have an excellent coaching staff here, and it's pretty neat to go 10-2 with this team that was one time called the youngest team in America," Spurrier said after Saturday night's 31-17 victory over Clemson in the Palmetto Bowl. "They've really achieved and I'm really proud of this team. I was thinking back to all the teams I've had, these guys may have achieved the most for (being) such a young bunch of guys that haven't played all that much and don't have that much experience. They've really played well this year. Give them credit."

Except for quarterback Connor Shaw and offensive guard Ronald Patrick, USC returns every player on the offensive side of the ball in 2014. The top four running backs (Mike Davis, Brandon Wilds, Shon Carson, David Williams) return, as well as every single wide receiver - most prominently Bruce Ellington, Damiere Byrd, Shaq Roland, Pharoh Cooper and Nick Jones - and tight ends Busta Anderson and Jerell Adams.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You could spin it that way or...


Dec 3, 2013, 12:07 AM

You can spin it like this...SC is losing their best offensive player on what is an already a very average offense ( 36th in the country ).

Not to mention they're losing all the best players on their defense...so...yea...

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

We could possibly follow in FSU's footsteps...


Dec 3, 2013, 12:01 AM

EJ Manuel resurrects FSU as a national power. Winston comes in and has success off of that.

Tajh resurrects Clemson as a national power. Watson comes in and has success off of that.

The players are in place and Watson is that type of QB that can take a program to the next level.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Also Sutton and Legree***


Dec 3, 2013, 12:22 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 26
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic