»
Topic: Tar Heel Buddy said without Watson they would have won & 15 pts
Replies: 27   Last Post: Jan 31, 2015 10:03 AM by: onederkid
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.


[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 27  

Tar Heel Buddy said without Watson they would have won & 15 pts

[1]
Posted: Jan 29, 2015 7:11 PM
 

Was a narrow win in his opin. What?!

GoTiGERS..keep kicking heels & buttts & coots!

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg

To All CLEMSON TiGERS..Sending you Bright Light from the Carolina Coast and hoping you get to witness a huge Orange sunset tonight. Go Tigers!


Their defense was worse than the coots this past season***


Posted: Jan 29, 2015 7:12 PM
 



badge-donor-05yr.jpg

Good ole Vic***

[1]
Posted: Jan 29, 2015 7:59 PM
 




so what

[2]
Posted: Jan 29, 2015 7:17 PM
 

last time I checked Watson was part of our team

2019 student level member

Re: Tar Heel Buddy said without Watson they would have won & 16 pts

[2]
Posted: Jan 29, 2015 7:22 PM
 

if switzer wasn't on their team they'd still be on the field sucking wind....


Re: Tar Heel Buddy said without Watson they would have won & 16 pts


Posted: Jan 29, 2015 7:46 PM
 

That's probably what louisville, BC, syracuse, wake, and OU said too. And we know know how those games turned out.


It would be hard to win any game without a QB***


Posted: Jan 29, 2015 7:47 PM
 




and if my aunt had a ..........

[1]
Posted: Jan 29, 2015 7:47 PM
 

She'd be my uncle!

military_donation.jpg

Re: Tar Heel Buddy said without Watson they would have won & 16 pts

[1]
Posted: Jan 29, 2015 7:49 PM
 

he is probably right, I do not see Stoudt throwing 6 TDs in that one.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

You should never chalk up to conspiracy what you can reliably attribute to stupidity. Because stupidity is a much more powerful force in the course of human events.


Re: Tar Heel Buddy said without Watson they would have won & 16 pts


Posted: Jan 29, 2015 8:15 PM
 

DO you see them making 14 points in the 4th with the first string still on the field?

http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/video?gameId=400547743&vid=11603267
^see how many first stringers you see in Hood's TD...any??


Re: Tar Heel Buddy said without Watson they would have won & 16 pts


Posted: Jan 29, 2015 8:17 PM
 

hard to say, but if we cant keep our offense on the field in that one, they could have easily outscored us.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

You should never chalk up to conspiracy what you can reliably attribute to stupidity. Because stupidity is a much more powerful force in the course of human events.


Re: Tar Heel Buddy said without Watson they would have won & 16 pts

[1]
Posted: Jan 29, 2015 8:21 PM
 

Trick is, Cole wasn't in his full blown meltdown yet by that game IMO. The UNC game was the first game after Fl State (so the first full game of Watson). Cole might have played fine then if he was still starter. ;)


every team has some delusional fans

[1]
Posted: Jan 29, 2015 7:56 PM
 

but most of the wilder TarHeel imaginations (and extreme expectations) are with basketball, not football

about the only claim the Heels could make is they did manage to score more points against the Tigers than anyone but the GA dawgs

forgive a nit-pick, but wasn't it 15 points? 50-35


Tell your 'heel buddy

[1]
Posted: Jan 29, 2015 8:08 PM
 

that if they didn't play a dozen guys to stupid to get into Clemson they would have lost by 30!

The basketball victory last night over ncsu was ESPECIALLY great for me. Thanlk BB.


Re: Tar Heel Buddy said without Watson they would have won & 15 pts

[1]
Posted: Jan 29, 2015 8:06 PM
 

Does he even realize that their final quarter was with our 2nd/3rd string D on the field...with without Watson, wouldn't have been off the field likely?? Game wasn't as close as the final score ,makes it appear...guess he needs to re-watch it.


Re: Tar Heel Buddy said without Watson they would have won & 15 pts


Posted: Jan 29, 2015 8:07 PM
 

*which without Watson, the 1st string...


Re: Tar Heel Buddy said without Watson they would have won & 15 pts


Posted: Jan 29, 2015 9:24 PM
 

Tell em they should be ashamed of letting an 18 yr old true freshman run up and down the field against them..

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg


But ya ARE, Heels! ...

[1]
Posted: Jan 29, 2015 9:33 PM
 



A point to anyone who gets it...

2019 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-revdodd.jpg


Re: But ya ARE, Heels! ...

[1]
Posted: Jan 30, 2015 2:30 PM
 

its all about the chair !


Re: Tar Heel Buddy said without Watson they would have won & 15 pts

[1]
Posted: Jan 29, 2015 9:49 PM
 

Rutgers 40 UNC 21 in the 12/26/14 bowl game, but they would have beaten Clemson? LOL, okay. ;>) Maybe UNC fans should stick to basketball and their fake classes.

2019 white level member

Re: Tar Heel Buddy said without Watson they would have won & 15 pts

[1]
Posted: Jan 29, 2015 11:02 PM
 

Bill, sounds like you need new buddies. Dem UNCheat buddies be stoopid. Tell him to re-watch that game. That game was OVAH by the 3rd quarter (or the half). Dey got curb-stomped.


Ask him when are they gonna get theirs for AcademicGate?***

[1]
Posted: Jan 30, 2015 7:55 AM
 




Re: Tar Heel Buddy said without Watson they would have won & 15 pts


Posted: Jan 30, 2015 8:15 AM
 

Hard to disagree. Our D mailed it in the second half and without Watson we would have scored 3-4 tds less.


Re: Tar Heel Buddy said without Watson they would have won & 15 pts


Posted: Jan 30, 2015 8:18 AM
 

you think maybe the d would have been more into the game if we had not been up by a million in the second half. some of you guys just baffle the gourd. smh

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Tar Heel Buddy said without Watson they would have won & 15 pts

[2]
Posted: Jan 30, 2015 5:53 PM
 

The score would've been much worse if UNC had used only academically eligible players.

2019 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg

the only good politician is a dead politician.


Re: Tar Heel Buddy said without Watson they would have won & 15 pts


Posted: Jan 31, 2015 7:46 AM
 

NOPE LOL. and WITH Watson Tigers win in Atlanta by at least 14. saying that, knowing that changes nothing.


And if their players had to take and pass classes, how many


Posted: Jan 31, 2015 9:02 AM
 

would they win?

2019 white level member

Re: Tar Heel Buddy said without Watson they would have won & 15 pts

[1]
Posted: Jan 31, 2015 10:03 AM
 

> Was a narrow win in his opin. What?!
>
> GoTiGERS..keep kicking heels & buttts & coots!

King of the sneaky trolls


Replies: 27  

TIGER TICKETS

FB GAME: Season Tickets
FOR SALE: For sale two 2019 Clemson Football season tickets in section UR, Row U, Seats 6 and 8, lower level, ...

Buy or Sell CU Tickets and More in Tiger Tickets!

[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
4318 people have read this post