|
Replies: 10
| visibility 672
|
CU Medallion [58376]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 46312
Joined: 4/23/00
|
Question regarding ND bowl tie-ins and revenue . . .
Sep 12, 2012, 5:20 PM
|
|
I understand that ND will not be part of the ACC in football, but will only play 5 games against ACC members per year, none of which will count as conference games or in conference standings. Got it.
I also understand that ND will not be part of the ACC/BCS/Orange Bowl tie-in; BUT they may still be the Opponnent of the ACC in these games, in which case they keep all of the revenue, with no conference split. Got it.
I also understand that ND WILL have access to non-BCS bowls through the ACC tie-ins, as if it were a full ACC member, with the exception that they would be eligible with one fewer win than any ACC team that would be considered. Got it. The question is, in this scenario, does Notre Dame keep all of the revenue, or do they split it with the other ACC schools?
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [4988]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7961
Joined: 2/27/02
|
I'm gonna to try and get some clarification on Twitter from
Sep 12, 2012, 5:22 PM
|
|
some reporters if I can right now. I want to know the same thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4988]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7961
Joined: 2/27/02
|
That didn't take long lol.
Sep 12, 2012, 5:24 PM
|
|
According to the ACC Sports Journal, they told me Notre Dame with keep bowl revenue, but the ACC will not pay for bowl travel expenses like it does for all other schools.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [58376]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 46312
Joined: 4/23/00
|
Wow - that eliminates one of the major positives of this
Sep 12, 2012, 5:39 PM
|
|
deal for the ACC. We give them access to a bowl, a bowl in which one of our full-member schools could participate and share the revenue. Wow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [223]
TigerPulse: 74%
Posts: 776
Joined: 11/22/03
|
The only positive i see in the bowl picture is the ACC
Sep 12, 2012, 5:42 PM
|
|
may can gain some better bowls in the future instead of the crap we have now
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5265]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5440
Joined: 9/11/04
|
Well, if you have been reading that won't happen
Sep 12, 2012, 5:44 PM
|
|
This is only non-BCS level bowls
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4988]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7961
Joined: 2/27/02
|
The can only be an ACC opponent in the Orange Bowl***
Sep 12, 2012, 5:51 PM
[ in reply to Just wait until ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4988]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7961
Joined: 2/27/02
|
Acutally not really unless they played in the Chick-fil-a
Sep 12, 2012, 5:59 PM
[ in reply to Wow - that eliminates one of the major positives of this ] |
|
bowl. The ACC gives on avg $1.5 mil to schools for travel expenses, which is pretty much around the payout of every bowl other than than Chick-fil-a. So instead of getting the bowl revenue, they keep the travel expense making it a wash.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savant [460]
TigerPulse: 51%
Posts: 700
Joined: 8/1/08
|
Our ACC just got screwed and their was no lubricant
Sep 12, 2012, 6:31 PM
|
|
This isn't my humble opinion this is fact.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18133]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22431
Joined: 9/1/99
|
Thing is, though, I expect to get at least one more good
Sep 12, 2012, 6:31 PM
|
|
bowl tie-in because of ND. Maybe we get the Gator back?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 10
| visibility 672
|
|
|
50
