»
Topic: Putting an end to the SEC strength of schedule crap for the coots....
Replies: 52   Last Post: Dec 24, 2018 7:58 PM by: BloodbeOrange®
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.


[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 52  

Putting an end to the SEC strength of schedule crap for the coots....

[73]
Posted: Dec 23, 2018 7:57 PM
 

Since 2012, Clemson has won 70% of its games against SEC opponents. SCAR is .500 during the same stretch. BUT Clemson has not benefited from playing Vandy, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mizzou or Arkansas.

Since 2012 Clemson has only played Bama, LSU, Auburn, SCAR, TAMU and UGA. What is SCAR's record against only THOSE SEC schools during that same stretch? 2-13!!!!

It ain't the dang conference. It's the dang coots and the dang Clemson Tigers.

2019 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Coots reading this thread be like:

[13]
Posted: Dec 23, 2018 8:02 PM
 






2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Photobucket


Re: Coots reading this thread be like:

[1]
Posted: Dec 23, 2018 11:54 PM
 

Congrats on potd. It deserves it !!!!

2019 orange level member2016_pickem_champ.jpg

That should even include two of the best seasons in

[7]
Posted: Dec 23, 2018 8:03 PM
 

school history for them.


Re: Putting an end to the SEC strength of schedule crap for the coots....

[3]
Posted: Dec 23, 2018 8:08 PM
 

Thank you CSO- bookmarking this to show my coot workers. Never thought about it that way.

Deserves potd!

2019 orange level member2016_pickem_champ.jpg

Re: Putting an end to the SEC strength of schedule crap for the coots....


Posted: Dec 24, 2018 9:14 AM
 

You will need more proof than this, but even that would not be enough to keep a coot from disagreeing. Facts have never been a factor that entered into their opinions. Why do the coots always schedule a cupcake or an open date the week before they play the Tigers? Well, that is a compliment to our lofty position but they don't even realize it. The fear of the Tigers is so ingrained in their minds they continually pray for a miracle.

military_donation.jpg

Re: Putting an end to the SEC strength of schedule crap for the coots....

[1]
Posted: Dec 23, 2018 8:12 PM
 

Well done! I will use this with many conversations!


Re: Putting an end to the SEC strength of schedule crap for the coots....

[1]
Posted: Dec 23, 2018 8:12 PM
 

Well done! I will use this with many conversations!


Re: Putting an end to the SEC strength of schedule crap for the coots....


Posted: Dec 23, 2018 8:37 PM
 

Since 2012, South Carolina has a 100% win record against ACC opponents Clemson plays.

Clemson only has a 96% winning percentage against those opponents...

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg

"Smelley, Garcia, and Beecher are going to lead you to 4-8." - york_tiger


Re: Putting an end to the SEC strength of schedule crap for the coots....

[7]
Posted: Dec 23, 2018 8:58 PM
 

2015 called and said YOU GOT BEAT BY EL CID, lol!!! But it’s really not that big a deal, right?

2019 white level member

Re: Putting an end to the SEC strength of schedule crap for the coots....


Posted: Dec 23, 2018 9:03 PM
 

The citadel is an ACC like team?

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg

"Smelley, Garcia, and Beecher are going to lead you to 4-8." - york_tiger


Re: Putting an end to the SEC strength of schedule crap for the coots....

[2]
Posted: Dec 23, 2018 9:08 PM
 

If that helps you sleep at night, bahaaahaa!

2019 white level member

Re: Putting an end to the SEC strength of schedule crap for the coots....


Posted: Dec 24, 2018 7:30 AM
 

Hard to fix stupid.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

Are you ever going to face the fact that you are a Gamecock fan?

[3]
Posted: Dec 23, 2018 9:20 PM
 



2019 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Putting an end to the SEC strength of schedule crap for the coots....


Posted: Dec 24, 2018 2:25 AM
 

That has beat you!!!

2019 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

Re: Putting an end to the SEC strength of schedule crap for the coots....


Posted: Dec 24, 2018 11:22 AM
 

Classless09 reminds me of a 10 year old girl saying I know you are but what am I.


Re: Putting an end to the SEC strength of schedule crap for the coots....


Posted: Dec 24, 2018 11:32 AM
 

09 - They're not as good as ACC teams, but The Citadel is ranked #2 in the state of South Carolina, and ranked higher than most SEC teams.

HTH


LOL you have endless nerve.

[3]
Posted: Dec 23, 2018 9:16 PM
 

I just showed you a dramatic difference. You have the nerve to put a 4% difference with your sample being so small? What do you grasp at when you don't even have straws?

2019 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Putting an end to the SEC strength of schedule crap for the coots....

[12]
Posted: Dec 23, 2018 9:16 PM
 


Since 2012, South Carolina has a 100% win record against ACC opponents Clemson plays.

Clemson only has a 96% winning percentage against those opponents...



I think your data is inaccurate. Since 2012, Clemson has lost to the following ACC teams: FSU (2012, 2013, 2014) Georgia Tech (2014) Pittsburgh (2016) Syracuse (2017). When has South Carolina played any of those teams since 2012? I don’t think they have. Therefore, South Carolina’s record against ANY ACC team since 2012 can’t possibly be anything other than equal to Clemson’s record.


Message was edited by: BigChief2000®



Re: Putting an end to the SEC strength of schedule crap for the coots....

[2]
Posted: Dec 23, 2018 9:29 PM
 

Wish I could give more than one TU! Facts are sort of amazing things when digested appropriately!

Go Tigers!!!

2019 orange level member

Bruh... I usually like your banter...

[3]
Posted: Dec 23, 2018 9:16 PM
 

but that is the weakest comeback I have ever heard.

2019 purple level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

Yeah, congrats on beating unc a couple of times...

[7]
Posted: Dec 23, 2018 9:20 PM
 

Proves the point of the original post.
Original poster’s point is that Clemson plays against the best SEC schools and beats them regularly. And part of that point is that you don’t even play the best most years, yet still are remarkably average in spite of a favorable conference schedule.
Clemson has more quality SEC wins than SC over the past several years.


Re: Putting an end to the SEC strength of schedule crap for the coots....

[8]
Posted: Dec 23, 2018 9:22 PM
 

I think you’re 1-5 against Clemson in that period, so yo can’t be 100%a against ACC teams.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Putting an end to the SEC strength of schedule crap for the coots....


Posted: Dec 24, 2018 8:23 AM
 

Clemson doesn’t play Clemson in the ACC.

HTH

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg

"Smelley, Garcia, and Beecher are going to lead you to 4-8." - york_tiger


It's always hilarious that an argument against Clemson

[1]
Posted: Dec 24, 2018 12:48 PM
 

fans can't include the Gamecocks actually playing Clemson.

VICTORY SMELLS LIKE BURNING CHICKEN.

2019 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Putting an end to the SEC strength of schedule crap for the coots....

[1]
Posted: Dec 23, 2018 9:23 PM
 

4-0 since 2012. Small sample size. You need more data points for this to be statistically significant. Try calculating a p value with a sample size of 4 if you don’t believe me.

2019 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

Re: Putting an end to the SEC strength of schedule crap for the coots....

[1]
Posted: Dec 23, 2018 9:32 PM
 

So against all the ACC teams USC has played in that time period, they are 6-5. That’s not much different than their winning % in the SEC.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Putting an end to the SEC strength of schedule crap for the coots....

[1]
Posted: Dec 23, 2018 9:59 PM
 

USC doesn't play ACC teams, I got the confuses.


LOL

[4]
Posted: Dec 23, 2018 9:26 PM
 

Yep, when you take out our record against you, our record against SEC opponents doesn't look as good, and when you take out your record against us, your record against ACC opponents looks better.

That's really something you want to point out?

And btw, you have beat precisely 0 ACC teams who we have lost to in the time frame you've mentioned.

2019 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg


Re: LOL


Posted: Dec 24, 2018 8:25 AM
 

So maybe you’ll agree picking and choosing statistics from your greatest run in school history is more of an outlier than the norm?

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg

"Smelley, Garcia, and Beecher are going to lead you to 4-8." - york_tiger


Re: LOL


Posted: Dec 24, 2018 8:46 AM
 

We could talk about our all time record against you losers.
No cherry picking.
What is the norm on that?
Don't want to talk about that do you?


Cherry picking? You are certifiable.

[2]
Posted: Dec 24, 2018 1:19 PM
 

You guys have won nine or more games only 7 times EVER
Clemson has done that 26 times.

You guys have ONE conference championship. EVER
We have 24

You have 4 consensus All Americans... EVER
We have had 25

You have 9 bowl victories... EVER
We have 22

You have only beaten Clemson 42 times... ever.
We have beaten you 70 times.

Let's use half of a century as our sample size, and break it down by decade.

In the 2010's we are 5-4 against you
In the 2000's we went 7-3
In the 90's we went 7-3
In the 80's we went 7-2-1
In the 70's we went 6-4

You guys are 100% beneath us. Not just now.

2019 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

I would agree

[1]
Posted: Dec 24, 2018 1:25 PM
 

If he had referenced an odd time in the past (“between 1952 and 1958...”), but he’s referencing now and talking about the ridiculous assertions that our success has to do with SOS, now.

2019 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg


Re: I would agree


Posted: Dec 24, 2018 2:58 PM
 

But it’s irrefutable that your success has to do with SOS.

You’ve won 4 straight ACC championships, do you think you would have won 4 straight SEC Championships ?

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg

"Smelley, Garcia, and Beecher are going to lead you to 4-8." - york_tiger


Re: I would agree

[1]
Posted: Dec 24, 2018 3:26 PM
 

Laughable you would ask for an opinion in the midst of an argument you are losing based on statistics and facts. Do you think if you were smarter you would be a Clemson fan? Yes and yes.

2019 white level member

Re: I would agree


Posted: Dec 24, 2018 4:27 PM
 

What are you squawking about?

I presented a factual argument that showed we had a better win % against your acc brethren than you did. But you guys got upset about that.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg

"Smelley, Garcia, and Beecher are going to lead you to 4-8." - york_tiger


You can't hear us laughing? We are entertained by your


Posted: Dec 24, 2018 7:39 PM
 

extreme and pathetic delusion. Gamecock fans like you actually add a bonus to our enjoyment! Watching you guys sink this low highlights just had badly we have run you guys into the ground.

I hope you keep going.

2019 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: I would agree


Posted: Dec 24, 2018 7:58 PM
 

Who’s upset? The thread is a highlight of your being a chicken punchline. I think that pretty funny.

Have a great Christmas. I’ll look forward to your coming back in 2019 for us all to laugh at some more.

2019 white level member

Yes, quality of a coot diploma, right there!

[2]
Posted: Dec 23, 2018 9:27 PM
 

You probably should learn to double check your ‘research’...

...96%, eh?

2019 white level membermilitary_donation.jpg

wwLBBd


He's reaching for a stat


Posted: Dec 23, 2018 9:33 PM
 

What he's trying to say is:

"USC's record against ACC teams not named Clemson is better than Clemson's record against the ACC as a whole in that time period."

I'd guess 96% is about right for our record against the ACC in that time frame.

But, it's a stupid stat in that it only serves to accentuate their poor record against us.

2019 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg


Re: Putting an end to the SEC strength of schedule crap for the coots....

[2]
Posted: Dec 23, 2018 9:30 PM
 

09' I try to give you the benefit of the doubt, but that was one of the dumbest statements I've ever heard anyone make. Enjoy that Belk Bowl in Charlotte. We'll enjoy 4 straight playoff berths and another National Championship

For relaxing times, make it Suntory time


Re: Putting an end to the SEC strength of schedule crap for the coots....

[1]
Posted: Dec 23, 2018 10:26 PM
 

“I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul...”

2019 white level member

Which ACC team has Clemson lost to that y’all have beat


Posted: Dec 24, 2018 12:32 AM
 

Since 2012?


Re: Putting an end to the SEC strength of schedule crap for the coots....


Posted: Dec 24, 2018 2:44 AM
 

You have never heard a Clemson fan saying that the ACC was a super conference. Just as there isn't a coat tail that Clemson can hold onto in the ACC, bc we are the coat tail of the ACC the same as Bama is the coat tail of the SEC. And the coots hold onto Bama's coat tail for dear life. Your fan base even spends their cash on Bama gear to wear just to feel part of something other than the losers that your team actually really are, coat tail clingers, your fan base are cling on's. Coot fans remind me of that lint screen in a cloths dryer, except y'all suck up to Bama the same way!!! The loser mentality is very becoming of the coot fan base to an extreme!!!

Message was edited by: allorangeallthetime52®


2019 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

Re: Putting an end to the SEC strength of schedule crap for the coots....


Posted: Dec 24, 2018 6:08 AM
 

We also have 100% record against all 1-AA teams we've played. What's South Carolina's record against 1-AA Competition?


Dang we should swap conferences.***

[1]
Posted: Dec 24, 2018 8:31 AM
 



2019 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Putting an end to the SEC strength of schedule crap for the coots....


Posted: Dec 24, 2018 11:40 AM
 

Just accept the fact that you suck and will always suck.Nobody gives a crap about who you beat since 2012. Just look at all the ACC teams you have a losing record against.There should be a law against being this stupid.Oh well,coots peck on...

badge-donor-10yr.jpg

Re: Putting an end to the SEC strength of schedule crap for the coots....


Posted: Dec 24, 2018 11:41 AM
 

09,
First have a blessed Christmas! Beyond NCST and UNC, If my memory serves me, your GCs haven’t even played ND, BC, Miami, FSU or Va. Tech. If you weigh SOS with Clemson having played and beaten all these teams and a UNC division champ, your stats have ZERO bearing period!!

If it makes you feel better we have both lost to USF in the virtual same period, but your teams have FIVE game losing streaks to Clemson, UK and TAMU!! Come back in 2019 to discuss records, especially since you are barely favored against UVA in your Belk Bowl contest.

Your beloved OBC is long gone and Tanner gives Muscrap and staff raises after a 7-5 season? We on the other hand would demand Dabo fire staff after such a season unless there unforeseen circumstances!

Enjoy the memories from Spurrier’s tenure because you likely won’t win anything close while Muscrap is your coach.

Go Tigers ??!!


What is our record against the SEC during that time?

[2]
Posted: Dec 23, 2018 8:45 PM
 

About 12-4?

2019 white level member

CSO rockin da stats.***

[1]
Posted: Dec 23, 2018 10:09 PM
 



2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Technically, SCU hasn’t benefited from playing KY either.***

[14]
Posted: Dec 23, 2018 10:10 PM
 



2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

"I've played multiple sports and would bet any amount that I'm still more athletic than you at this present time...."


Re: Technically, SCU hasn’t benefited from playing KY either.***

[4]
Posted: Dec 24, 2018 9:08 AM
 

POTT Post of The Thread!

Subtract SC and we are 6-4 or 60% vs Bama, LSU, Auburn, UGA. SC is 2-13 or 13% vs the same competition. 2 of Clemson's losses came in CFP games. You, know the games Coots can only participate in by watching on TV and pulling for Bama!


Haha good point.***

[1]
Posted: Dec 24, 2018 12:41 PM
 



2019 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Replies: 52  
[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
9349 people have read this post