»
Topic: OK, I'm confused again, which carolina is accused paying
Replies: 16   Last Post: Mar 21, 2013 1:58 PM by: tigtag1
[ Other Sports Boards - Rivalries ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 16  

OK, I'm confused again, which carolina is accused paying

[2]
Posted: Mar 11, 2013 9:02 PM
    Reply

football players???

2020 white level member

Yes***

[1]
Posted: Mar 11, 2013 9:13 PM
    Reply



2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

"IDIOT POSTER OF THE MONTH SO FAR...GWP-- You have won IPM Award for your failure to completely comprehend a clear post & then choose to attack someone who points out your ignorance. While you are not yet in the same No Class Catagory as deRoberts, ClemTiger117 & Tigerdug23, you are getting closer to the Sewer Dwellers." - coachmac


Re: OK, I'm confused again, which carolina is accused paying


Posted: Mar 12, 2013 12:25 AM
    Reply

SCU had four ineligible football players active in 2009-2010, but did not forfeit any games. Georgia Tech had basically the same deal at the same time and ended up forfeiting a bunch of games. What was the difference?


conference affiliation !


Posted: Mar 12, 2013 1:54 AM
    Reply

that one is easy.

military_donation.jpg

S-E-C!***


Posted: Mar 12, 2013 7:50 AM
    Reply



badge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: OK, I'm confused again, which carolina is accused paying


Posted: Mar 12, 2013 2:05 AM
    Reply

If i recall correctly, GTech intentionally misled the NCAA, while the NCAA said we did an awesome job with the investigation(See below). Obviously someone in compliance made some mistakes regarding the Whitney. We never played anyone until the NCAA cleared the individual players.

Here's the quote from the NCAA regarding the investigation.

The Committee agreed the penalties self-imposed by the University in its response to the Notice of Allegations were appropriate. The Committee's decision states:
"The committee decided not to impose more stringent sanctions in this case, including a postseason ban because: i) the cooperation exhibited by the institution went beyond its obligations under [NCAA Bylaws]; ii) the violations were limited in scope; iii) the institution self-imposed significant penalties and; iv) there was no unethical conduct in this case."

Georgia Tech
The Institute was cited for a lack of cooperation during the investigation, a failure to meet the conditions and obligations of membership and preferential treatment violations. There were additional violations in the men’s basketball program related to rules stemming from a nonscholastic basketball tournament conducted on the Institute’s campus, which the public report further details.
TIFWIW


yep, all schools should put their best players up in 5-star


Posted: Mar 12, 2013 2:10 AM
    Reply

hotels. nothing wrong with that. limo service and laundry/housekeeping included,of course.

military_donation.jpg

slap on your own wrist hardly equates to sanctions..pathetic


Posted: Mar 12, 2013 8:47 AM
    Reply

spurrier had ppl in places protecting him not SCar

2020 student level member

blah, blah, blah***


Posted: Mar 12, 2013 9:56 AM
    Reply



2020 purple level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg


"something in these hills..." -joe sherman


Re: OK, I'm confused again, which carolina is accused paying


Posted: Mar 12, 2013 11:56 PM
    Reply

Just a minor correction to your post:

South Carolina played ineligible player during the 2009 season:

"South Carolina also said it would pay a fine of $18,500 for four football players who played while ineligible in 2009 due to these violations and reduce its number of official visits for its football and track and field teams."

http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/7353605/south-carolina-gamecocks-not-disputing-rules-violations-cut-scholarships

Playing ineligible players means they should have forfeited some games. It's odd why that didn't happen, regardless of their cooperation after being caught.


Both on NCAA Probation***

[1]
Posted: Mar 12, 2013 5:50 AM
    Reply




So the moral is play along when you get caught***


Posted: Mar 12, 2013 6:17 AM
    Reply



2020 white level member

Risk vs Reward***

[1]
Posted: Mar 12, 2013 6:21 AM
    Reply



2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

Exactly.***


Posted: Mar 12, 2013 7:51 AM
    Reply



badge-donor-05yr.jpg

Historically when we see Carolina along with


Posted: Mar 12, 2013 6:39 AM
    Reply

arrest, violation and/or cheating we assume it is usuc, but no more...

2020 white level member

Re: Historically when we see Carolina along with


Posted: Mar 12, 2013 8:38 AM
    Reply

Nah, now it means both are guilty!


Re: Historically when we see Carolina along with


Posted: Mar 21, 2013 1:58 PM
    Reply

Have no love for usc but they are rookies compared to unc..UNC with over 500 fake classes going back to 1997 in order to keep players eligible and brag about APR..

UNC lured a usc player to Marvin's party...cheater's retreat event.


Replies: 16  

TIGER TICKETS

FB GAME: Season Tickets
FOR SALE: Two for sale lower south sec:H row:II seats 13,15(about 18 yard line) about 10 steps below the porta...

Buy or Sell CU Tickets and More in Tiger Tickets!

[ Other Sports Boards - Rivalries ]
Start New Topic
3105 people have read this post