»
Topic: New Story: Instant Analysis: Clemson 33, Wake Forest 13
Replies: 7   Last Post: Nov 22, 2015 12:16 AM by: mattthemurse
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.


[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 7  

New Story: Instant Analysis: Clemson 33, Wake Forest 13


Posted: Nov 21, 2015 6:51 PM
 

 
Instant Analysis: Clemson 33, Wake Forest 13

The Clemson Tigers continue to roll, picking up their 11th win this season and 14th consecutive win dating back to 2014. Clemson (11-0 overall, 8-0 ACC) defeated Wake Forest (3-8, 1-6) 33-13 Saturday afternoon in Death Valley.Photo by Dawson Powers / USATODAY Full Story »



Re: New Story: Instant Analysis: Clemson 33, Wake Forest 13


Posted: Nov 21, 2015 6:55 PM
 

I always knew the articles were pretty much prewritten but it's even more obvious when he didn't replace "xx" yards with an actual number ??


Re: New Story: Instant Analysis: Clemson 33, Wake Forest 13

[2]
Posted: Nov 21, 2015 6:57 PM
 

Very sloppy game again. We will lose a game soon if we don't start taking care of the ball. Why keep DW in the game at wide out and why not punt the ball on 4th down late in the game. This team better wake up.


I see what you did there at the end... Nice!***


Posted: Nov 21, 2015 6:59 PM
 




Re: New Story: Instant Analysis: Clemson 33, Wake Forest 13


Posted: Nov 21, 2015 7:10 PM
 

FCS not FCU... Hope you did that on purpose.

What about Big Ben...did he end up with a concussion?

2019 purple level member

Awesome that the defense held Wake to xx yards on xx plays.***


Posted: Nov 21, 2015 7:18 PM
 



2019 purple level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: New Story: Instant Analysis: Clemson 33, Wake Forest 13

[1]
Posted: Nov 21, 2015 11:19 PM
 

I like the 63 wins and 17 losses stat. Hopefully that number is repeated next weekend! GO TIGERS!!


Re: New Story: Instant Analysis: Clemson 33, Wake Forest 13


Posted: Nov 22, 2015 12:16 AM
 

I picked up on that too.


Replies: 7  
[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
1737 people have read this post