»
Topic: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"
Replies: 123   Last Post: Nov 8, 2016 4:26 PM by: jfman960
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.


[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 123  

FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"

[5]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:17 AM
 

 
CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"

Read Update »



Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"

[2]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:19 AM
 

Ha-ha. Good Lord.


Neuheisel is nothing but a west coast homer


Posted: Nov 1, 2016 5:18 PM
 

Rick tends to go with west coast teams since he coached at UCLA and was fired due to lack of wins. Nobody would hire him so he is an announcer on College Sports Channel 84. He does has some good insight into college football but he is way off on his analysis here. The object of the game is to win. Clemson knows how to finish this year.


Re: Neuheisel is nothing but a west coast homer


Posted: Nov 2, 2016 12:39 AM
 

Strength of schedule.

2019 orange level member


Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"

[4]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:19 AM
 

Moron


he has lost his dang mind***

[3]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:19 AM
 




Prepare yourself sir, because by your metric ...

[6]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:19 AM
 

... the committee will be biased.

Because Clemson will be no lower than #2.


Re: Prepare yourself sir, because by your metric ...

[2]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:26 AM
 

Please tell me again why we care what he says...


CLICKBAIT!!!

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 12:05 PM
 

tia

2019 white level member

Re: Prepare yourself sir, because by your metric ...

[2]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:38 AM
 

Agreed, I believe we edge out Michigan because of our strength of schedule and quality wins and come in at #2.

2019 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Yea we should not care what the goof says ...***


Posted: Nov 1, 2016 4:41 PM
 




Germans alert!: It's "Herr Nuehisel", is it not??

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 2:14 PM
 

..Washington is this years version of last year's MSU; even if they do make the playoffs they will be carved up....


That is some of the worst logic...


Posted: Nov 2, 2016 11:22 AM
 

that I have ever heard. Pts. allowed and pts scored rankings are only meaningful if you play decent teams, which Washington hasn't. I take nothing away from Washington though, they have an impressive team. I think he needs to focus more on the fact they are behind Texas A & M, which have something Clemson doesn't- A LOSS.


He sounds biased.*****

[2]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:21 AM
 



2019 white level member

Re: He sounds biased.*****

[4]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:41 AM
 

I have listened to Rick Neuheisel for years on Satellite Radio. I like him far more than most, maybe because he's not an SEC homer. Unfortunately, the flip side to that is that he is an unabashed PAC12 homer. He loves everything PAC 12, and he thinks the greatest venue in the world is the Rose Bowl. So don't put too much stock into what he says.

2019 purple level member

Re: He sounds biased.*****

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 2:01 PM
 

He might be right about the Rose Bowl...

2019 student level member

I completely agree.***

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 12:13 PM
 



military_donation.jpg

He sounds touched.


Posted: Nov 1, 2016 5:42 PM
 

In the head.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

Idiot. You play in a ###### conference. We beat

[5]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:21 AM
 

Louisville, fsu, auburn, etc. all ranked in the top 20. You have one in the top 20. Shut up and play someone. I would love it if things would shake up so that we could play them first.

military_donation.jpg

Re: Idiot. You play in a ###### conference. We beat

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 1:27 PM
 

He wouldn't enjoy that so much though.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

jo

Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:21 AM
 

Is Pacman still on that show with him? If so did he shut him down with facts?


Packer is on 4-7 PM typically with Matt Leinart now***

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 12:11 PM
 



2019 student level member

or Robert Smith - more variability than when Brady Hoke


Posted: Nov 2, 2016 12:09 PM
 

was there

2019 student level member

Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"

[3]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:21 AM
 

Biased towards teams that play a more difficult schedule yes


he's a washed up HC and degenerate gambler. that is all.

[5]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:22 AM
 

nm


Why would anyone care what he says or thinks?

[6]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:23 AM
 

There is a very good reason why he's been out of coaching for the last five years.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg

Sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together.


No surprise. What did u guys expect

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:24 AM
 

from the biggest PAC 12 homer out there

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

He was Washington's head coach from 1999-2002

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 12:31 PM
 

Entire playing & college coaching career has been in the Pac-12.


Committee IS biased--towards teams that play tough schedules***

[3]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:25 AM
 



badge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:25 AM
 

He just doesn't want udub playing Bama in atl first game. Hidden agenda folks. Maybe he has a career in politics


Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"


Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:26 AM
 

He just doesn't want udub playing Bama in atl first game. Hidden agenda folks. Maybe he has a career in politics


Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:43 AM
 

He IS a lawyer!

2019 purple level member

Can you say BEAT DOWN?***


Posted: Nov 1, 2016 3:39 PM
 



2019 orange level member

Hes a former PAC 12 coach. Nothing to see here.***

[2]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:26 AM
 



2019 purple level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

~this~***

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 3:05 PM
 



military_donation.jpg

Cocaines a helluva drug

[2]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:26 AM
 

.


LOLOLOL an ex washington coach claiming bias while

[2]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:35 AM
 

touting washington....

There's a word for that.....

Also, Troy is ranked higher than anyone washington has played outside of utah. And...a TERRIBLE arizona team to washington to OT

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

"Clemson has been historically better than Carolina. That's pretty obvious." - Classof09

"No one knew we were overhyped until the season started." - Classof09


Here's a lot of words about Neuheisel, from an article back

[3]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:44 AM
 

when he got fired from Washington for betting on NCAA games.

"After he left Colorado, the NCAA discovered 51 violations committed during his tenure, slapping the school with two years of probation. The American Football Coaches Association formally censured him for a lack of remorse. Neuheisel later described his approach to NCAA rules as "creative." Even when not breaking the letter of a rule, he often found ways to violate one in spirit. For instance, during periods when he was forbidden to visit recruits, he would drive in front of a prospective player's home, call him on his cell phone, and tell him to look out the window, where he would see Neuheisel waving. Washington high-school star Larry Stevens, who had spurned Neuheisel, described how the coach's pursuit bordered on stalking. Nonetheless Neuheisel, with a straight face, accused Pac-10 rival Bob Toledo of continuing to recruit players who had declared their intention to attend Washington.

While he maintained his golden-boy reputation with the national media and prospective employers, fellow coaches and fans referred to him as "Neuweasel" and "Slick Rick." The latter is a conscious reference to President Clinton, to whom Neuheisel was often likened by his critics. The comparison is deeply unfair. At least Clinton was a good president."

That, people, is who is claiming possible bias for Clemson. He really does remind me of Slimey Bill, now that I think about it.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

~this too~***

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 3:06 PM
 



military_donation.jpg

Re: Here's a lot of words about Neuheisel, from an article back


Posted: Nov 1, 2016 3:45 PM
 

Okay, you lost me on "clinton was a good president." In whose universe was Slick Willy a good president? LOL.

Go Tigers!

2019 orange level member

If Rick Neuheisel is ranked higher than Champ Kind,

[2]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:41 AM
 


...the committee is biased!

2019 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-revdodd.jpg


NEUHEISEL FOR PRESIDENT!!!!

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:41 AM
 

Hail, what's another dipstick, dumbbass running gonna hurt?!

How convenient to ignore every other stat EXCEPT the ONLY one that supports your (former) team.....

Bias, you say?

2019 white level membermilitary_donation.jpg

wwLBBd


Hate to say it, but with the choices we have


Posted: Nov 1, 2016 4:13 PM
 

he might be just as good.

military_donation.jpg

Yeah, I'm sure the committee is biased and not the guy

[2]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:42 AM
 

that spent his entire coaching career out work, largely coaching at Pac 12 schools including Washington, and is a current analyst for the Pac 12 Network. Yeah, I'm sure THAT guy isn't biased.

He's also using dumb stats with no regard for strength of schedule. Washington has played one of the weakest schedules of any FBS (not just P5, all of FBS) school.


out west****


Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:43 AM
 




uh yeah, we play a much tougher schedule than Washington...

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:43 AM
 

and we have a target on our back from winning so much since 2011 and making it to the national title game. Last time Washington was good was when Marcus Tuiasposa was their QB and that was back in the early 00's

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

they have to play...

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:43 AM
 

Cal, asu, USC and wash state

Two losses


Holy Crap!!!

[3]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:49 AM
 

I would LOVE to play Washington - we would obliterate them. Just like Oklahomo, they have not played a team with our speed and physicality.

Say hello to Wilkins and Lawrence...

2019 white level member

~• Other than THAT Jackie, how was the parade? •~


1% of teams would go undefeated with our schedule

[2]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:52 AM
 

That 1% is Clemson


UW has played NOBODY.***

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:54 AM
 



2019 student level member

Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:55 AM
 

sounds like to me that he may be the one who is biased!


Ricky must've lost a bet on Clemson

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:58 AM
 

He liked to play the ponies!

badge-donor-05yr.jpg


Re: Ricky must've lost a bet on Clemson

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:59 AM
 

or maybe he got shot down at the esso club when he and packer were here.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

Wait, and who's the biased one here?***

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:58 AM
 



military_donation.jpg

NCAA has followed Ole Rick at every coaching stop he has made

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 11:59 AM
 

His opinion means nothing. Basically a younger version of Lou Holtz.

2019 orange level member

Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 12:00 PM
 

I thought Washington was one of the top 4 teams in the nation, UNTIL THEY PLAYED UTAH. They struggled with UTAH. Geez, make them play somebody decent and let's see if they are really any good. Right now, I would rate UL, Auburn, TAM, and FSU over Michigan and Washington. He should be happy that Washington won't have to play anybody worth a crap until the playoff. Bama will destroy UW and CLEMSON will destroy Meeeshigun. Rematch.


He's going to be really angry when Clemson is #2.***

[2]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 12:01 PM
 




Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"

[2]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 12:03 PM
 

I have got find a job where I get paid to be stupid. So it's held against you when you have played the toughest schedule and scored less points versus playing pansies and running up the score.


Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 12:10 PM
 

Rick Neuheisel? Never heard of her.


EVEN UCLA KNEW THEY OVER PAID Neuheisel.

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 12:13 PM
 

FIRED HIM AND HE WAS MAKING 1.25 MILLION A YEAR. PAID HIS SUCCESSOR ABOUT 3 MIL A YEAR.
CLEMSON HAS PLAYED THE TOUGHEST SCHEDULE TO DATE IN COLLEGE FOOTBALL. WASHINGTON'S SOS IS LAST
IN PAC 12. LINK BELOW

http://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/ranking-2016-college-football-nonconference-schedule-strength/

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

PAC 10 and SEC bias for Coach Ric

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 12:14 PM
 

He is comparing Apples to Oranges! Idaho is the bottom dweller of the Sun Belt! Troy is the Best team in the Sun Belt! UW has played Nowhere near the schedule that Clemson has played! It took three no calls (block in the back) on UW's winning punt return to beat Utah! I Quess ole Ric didn't see that either!!

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg

Without idiots, the world is a far less entertaining place*****

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 12:15 PM
 



2019 orange level member

Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 12:18 PM
 

I'm not going to get too worked up about this, but I will say it's funny that Neuheisel is saying other people would be biased to put Clemson over Washington...yet he used to coach Washington.


Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 12:19 PM
 

I love when people like this come out with their insane opinions. Makes things SO much more interesting.


Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"

[2]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 12:20 PM
 

Never heard of this guy, and he decided to take a shot at one of the most rabid/reactive fan bases in the country. Go ahead sport, use Clemson to get your 15 minutes of fame. You're welcome for the recognition you wouldn't have gotten otherwise.

2019 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

well he's in for a rude awakening... that strength of schedu

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 12:31 PM
 

schedule will create some bias no doubt. I say we're at #2 tonight.


People seem to forget about Rick...

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 12:42 PM
 

That he used to be the coach at UW...so if he wants to talk about bias he should start with himself. And while he tries to point out where our O and D rank, etc., he's missing a key component of who we've played and our SOS - which is #1.

Suckit Rick, you're as good a commentator as you were a coach.


Last sentence says all you need to know.***

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 12:45 PM
 



military_donation.jpg

Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 12:48 PM
 

As a Clemson native, alumnus, and fan for 40+ years, I hope the Tigers are ranked fourth....


Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 12:49 PM
 

This is why I am glad the coaches and AP poll is a non existent factor in terms of how we pick the best 4 teams. When a former coach comes out and says it boils down to pts per game against pts given up you know something is wrong. The schedule is the measuring stick and who you beat and their win loss percentage. Its not even close for Clemson and Washington. 3 top 25 wins against one, and two of ours being on the road. Theirs being one on the road. Strength of record for me should be the determining factor, but I know they look at more than just that.


Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 12:52 PM
 

This is a good indication of why Ol' Rick is no longer coaching. Turnovers has been our #1 problem on offense this year. He is the one who is not watching games. He must be a west coast boy.

2019 orange level member

Lousy coach, lousy analyst.

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 12:59 PM
 

That is all.


Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 12:59 PM
 

Sounds like this guy's had a personal vendetta against Clemson.

military_donation.jpg

Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 1:04 PM
 

If anybody has his ( Neuheisel ) E-Mail, please post!!! TIA

2019 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 1:10 PM
 

I've got 1 question. Which one of you Clemson guys boned his wife? Obviously. he's still upset about that. Go Tigers.

military_donation.jpg

Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 1:16 PM
 

Why are idiots allowed to have microphones ?!?


Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 1:40 PM
 

As always, all of us can use any metric system we want in order to validate our opinion. New-not-so-wisel is looking at points per game, both offense and defense, but is not paying much attention to strength of schedule. This is why the committee is so much more reliable. They can take their time looking at many factors and not being pressured to come up with a quick, 20 second sound bite.


Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 1:43 PM
 

You cannot argue being bias, given the fact that rick was a coach for Washington.


Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"

[7]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 1:55 PM
 

I love my guy, Rick Neuheisel, but he's in for a shocking surprise tonight.

I told him if he keeps this up, he's no longer welcomed at the ESSO Club.

I'll set the record straight this afternoon on the show.


Great first post ! ! ! Welcome ! ! !***

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 2:21 PM
 



2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Great first post ! ! ! Welcome ! ! !***

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 2:40 PM
 

If Neuheisel knew anything about college football today, he would still be coaching. Who's biased here? I think the one running his mouth.

2019 purple level member


Re: Great first post ! ! ! Welcome ! ! !***

[6]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 3:01 PM
 

Rick knows football, but his reasoning is flawed.

Don't get me wrong, Washington has a terrific club. But their SOS is 39 (Clemson is #1)....it's easier to put up offensive and defensive stats vs. marginal competition.

Washington has a quality win on the road against Utah.....unfortunately the rest of their schedule is lukewarm at best. Only two of their first 8 opponents are over .500 (Utah & Stanford).

Clemson has two wins over Top 20 teams.....on the road. Not to mention a win over Louisville, too.

It's not even a close comparison....

Rick''s a great dude....but he's wrong about the committee and any bias.


But , just please , try to make him seem just a little


Posted: Nov 1, 2016 4:12 PM
 

foolish in showing how wrong he is. It's just wrong to point out how biased an opinion is before it is even given.

military_donation.jpg

OMG! Pack! We love you! Please set him straight!!!

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 3:30 PM
 

I will be listening


Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"


Posted: Nov 1, 2016 3:35 PM
 

Irresponsible even for Rick. I believe we will be #1 for the simple fact is they don't want TWO ACC teams in the National Championship. E$ECPN would go ballistic.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg

Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"


Posted: Nov 1, 2016 6:45 PM
 

Poor Rick. The numbers tonight do not mean anything. Winning is all that matters. Lets talk again after the championship games.


Listen every day! Love yesterday asking if the


Posted: Nov 2, 2016 12:07 PM
 

computer could determine Deshaun's record as a starter, lol!

You should try and get him on the show briefly

2019 student level member

can i punch him?***

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 2:41 PM
 




Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 2:43 PM
 

Neuheisel is an idiot! Washington hasn’t played as tough of a schedule as we have. Of their opponents - to date - they are a combined 25 and 40! That’s a 38.5% winning %.Meanwhile Clemson's opponents - to date - are 40 and 22! That’s a 64.5% winning %.We have played Auburn, Louisville and Fla. State. Washington has played Stanford and Utah. I believe its pretty clear who the better ream is at this point! Go Tigers!


Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 2:56 PM
 

So what does this complete idiot think our stats would look like if we had been playing Washington's, weak, weak schedule? We would easily be number 1 in points scored and points allowed! What a moron.

2019 white level member

I HAVE NO WORDS --- I'M SO MAD!!!! We'll see about that!***

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 3:03 PM
 




He talks about bias. He is biased towards Pac-12 teams.***

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 3:04 PM
 




Neushit...is the one biased!***

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 3:04 PM
 



military_donation.jpg

So the fact Clemson Beat the Heisman frontrunner and has #1 strongest schedule

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 3:13 PM
 

Does nothing for this guy. The fact that the ACC has gotten stronger across the board does nothing for this guy. What an idiot. I guess the ACC will whip the sec again for the 3rd straight year and he will crawl his little $$$ into a hole until next year


Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 3:16 PM
 

Better team beating better opponents. Of course they are biased. If your team is bad, you are not as highly rated. Troy is better than half of the PAC 12 teams.


This ought to fire the players up***

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 3:17 PM
 




Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 3:18 PM
 

This guy is stupid he failed to say the best and only ranked team Washington has beat is Utah who has struggled we have beaten still currently ranked 5 11 and 19 still ranked only team bama beat still ranked is Texas am! Anyone can have good defensive numbers when they have only played 2 top 50 offenses (Colorado and Hawaii) for Michigan they haven't played anyone so if this guy could actually look at those stats they will see we aren't overrated how do some of these ppl have jobs I could do far better


Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"


Posted: Nov 1, 2016 3:18 PM
 

This guy is stupid he failed to say the best and only ranked team Washington has beat is Utah who has struggled we have beaten still currently ranked 5 11 and 19 still ranked only team bama beat still ranked is Texas am! Anyone can have good defensive numbers when they have only played 2 top 50 offenses (Colorado and Hawaii) for Michigan they haven't played anyone so if this guy could actually look at those stats they will see we aren't overrated how do some of these ppl have jobs I could do far better


My high school football averages 42points a game

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 3:24 PM
 

Their opponent averages 14 points. Based on his logic, they should be in consideration for the playoffs.


so what do you think he'll say if we lose 1.....

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 3:30 PM
 

yeah, we've punched out ticket;

we beat Louisville H2H;

we've got the best schedule after 8 games;

we might win the ACC Championship which is what the Committee said they wanted;

et al, ad nauseum.

Politics people, politics....

the team better know that if they lose they've got a real fight on their hands

and they won't control the outcome in any way.


Hey, Rick...


Posted: Nov 1, 2016 3:33 PM
 

Have you ever heard of "strength of schedule"?

Have you checked out the teams Washington/Michigan has played?

Have you checked your #### bias lately?

How about when Clemson checks in at #2 you just bite my big white southern a$$?

Go, Tigers!

2019 orange level member

Neuheisel can suck it

[2]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 3:38 PM
 

There's a reason he's in broadcasting, and not coaching.


Most Entertaining Thread in quite some time.


Posted: Nov 1, 2016 3:48 PM
 

Rick Dickheysiel was a mediorcre coach and had less than mediocre views. If this was Columbia send him to Bull Street.


Guess he doesn't realize the pac12 is in the toilet this yr


Posted: Nov 1, 2016 3:46 PM
 

Washington will lose in the first round, they make it.


Washington will NOT lose in the first round...

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 3:49 PM
 

they will not be there! They have no business being there. That said, I would love to play them in the first round! Go Tigers.

2019 orange level member

+1***


Posted: Nov 1, 2016 4:48 PM
 




Wow what a complete @ss. Foot in mouth.


Posted: Nov 1, 2016 3:57 PM
 

Ultra ironic considering his obvious bias.

2019 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

I think he sounds biased - the committee should


Posted: Nov 1, 2016 4:06 PM
 

point that out and let him know directly that his opinion doesn't matter.

military_donation.jpg

Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"


Posted: Nov 1, 2016 4:14 PM
 

PAC-12 homer who couldn't get the job done at Washington when he was head coach.


Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"


Posted: Nov 1, 2016 4:30 PM
 

Says the former Washington head coach. Lol...he's not biased at all. Besides, when will Washington play someone other than HS teams?

2019 purple level member

lmao! Talk about bias,


Posted: Nov 1, 2016 4:37 PM
 

we know you coached at Washington and UCLA, so yes, we see your bias.

Clemson has the best résumé to date, THIS YEAR.

Points per game mean nothing when you are not playing but one defense with a pulse. Stanford's D was minus their starting CBs.

2019 white level member

let me get this straight...


Posted: Nov 1, 2016 4:53 PM
 

All of a sudden REFEREES LOVE US and POLLSTERS ARE BIAS IN OUR FAVOR. Do not resuscitate! I've died and gone to CLEMSON HEAVEN!


Strength of schedule, you moron


Posted: Nov 1, 2016 5:08 PM
 

Clemson #1 in the nation, Washington #38, having played only 1 top 25 team all year and Nobody inside the top 15.


Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"


Posted: Nov 1, 2016 5:08 PM
 

Talk about bias Rick . Who the #### has Washington played ? A lot of the teams they beat have LOSING RECORDS . They finally played a tough road game and #### near got beat if not for Utah giving up a punt return in which there were several clips. Washington should not even be #4 ,...Louisville is a much better team than Washington ...oh and we BEAT THEM.


Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"

[1]
Posted: Nov 1, 2016 5:11 PM
 

Guess he will really be pissedd if the Tigers are ranked number one tonight.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"


Posted: Nov 1, 2016 5:29 PM
 

If RN had an unbiased brain, he'd factor in SOS and RPI. Tigers are #1 and Top 10. WASH is absurd.

military_donation.jpg

Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"


Posted: Nov 1, 2016 5:30 PM
 

As Abraham from the waking dead said. "You can kiss my N U T Z".


Crack is a heckuva drug


Posted: Nov 1, 2016 6:01 PM
 

??


One mirror please.***


Posted: Nov 1, 2016 6:22 PM
 




Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"


Posted: Nov 1, 2016 6:51 PM
 

What an idiot. You would think that he would at least do some research! Three of Washington's wins came against Rutgers (2-6) (giving up over 37 points a game), Idaho (4-4) (giving up over 37 points a game); Portland St. (2-6) (giving up over 40 points a game). You can essentially put him on the Donald Trump "idiot" "stupid" list!


Neuheisel is wrong


Posted: Nov 1, 2016 7:15 PM
 

I see why he is a former head coach now.


Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"


Posted: Nov 1, 2016 7:19 PM
 

Somewhere this dude is crying now.


Re: FB Update: CBS Sports analyst: "If Clemson is higher than #4, the committee is biased"


Posted: Nov 2, 2016 12:32 AM
 

..."but I think their win over Auburn trumps anything Washington has done because Washington’s non-conference was so weak. I think the committee is going to look at that. Plus, the Pac 12 is a little weird – up is down and down is up."

This was said by Chris Childers in response to Neuheisel's rant. Neuheisel did not say this part.


I disagree with his comments, but...


Posted: Nov 8, 2016 4:26 PM
 

...you have inaccurately quoted Neuheisel; lumping his comments in the same quotation marks as the radio host's comments when there were actually TWO people making these comments and disagreeing with one another on top of that.


Replies: 123  
[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
11255 people have read this post