Replies: 11
| visibility 1
|
Orange Blooded [3740]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 4195
Joined: 10/11/12
|
McShay thinks Beasley's 220 lbs. This is why I hate this guy
Jan 9, 2015, 5:23 PM
|
|
“Beasley is much smaller, 6-2 220ish." http://www.independentmail.com/orange-and-white/vic-beasley-a-hometown-falcons-fit
This is the kind of crap these draft analyst idiots spread in the pre-draft process in the media to knowingly or unknowingly create a negative vibe about a player. Vic played at 235 lbs. He's one of the more highly known prospects in the draft. How could he not accurately know a guy of Vic's accomplishments actual playing weight for the year.
|
|
|
|
Standout [311]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 667
Joined: 11/23/14
|
Cut him some slack ESecPN on let's him watch our games VS the SEC***
Jan 9, 2015, 5:26 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2702]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1452
Joined: 1/20/12
|
What incentive does he have to say inaccurate stuff?
Jan 9, 2015, 5:28 PM
|
|
Unlike commentators who give opinion and can spin their SEC stuff this way to Sunday, McShay is paid to be very knowledgeable about these guys. Reporting bad stats just makes him look bad. Don't see why he would do that on purpose.
|
|
|
|
|
Aficionado [151]
TigerPulse: 40%
Posts: 615
Joined: 3/7/11
|
Re: McShay thinks Beasley's 220 lbs. This is why I hate this guy
Jan 9, 2015, 5:30 PM
|
|
Yeah I've seen the same thing on other mock drafts . I read scouts put him on the scale and was 220 but that was last December or January . Now that he is out of batson reach he will put some weight on. Just look at his lower body he will have no problem putting weight on . Think he will show up at the combine at 248-253 pounds
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [28211]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14038
Joined: 6/27/14
|
Cocklover***
Jan 9, 2015, 5:33 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aficionado [151]
TigerPulse: 40%
Posts: 615
Joined: 3/7/11
|
Re: Cocklover***
Jan 9, 2015, 5:37 PM
|
|
Somebody named The Clash calling somebody cocklover haha . Point out what I said that makes me a gamecock fan
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4974]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 8239
Joined: 12/9/12
|
Re: McShay thinks Beasley's 220 lbs. This is why I hate this guy
Jan 9, 2015, 5:39 PM
|
|
McShay can be a doucher at times...and is ALWAYS wrong...Thats why I never read or pay attention to those ridiculous opinionated MOCK Drafts..they are ALWAYS wrong...
But on the flip side of that...Sadly enough, Vic is going to have to put on some more pounds if he is going to be playing DE in the NFL...There are Tackles in the league like Jake Matthews from the Falcons or Bryan Bulaga from Green Bay who stand at 6'5 340 pounds, easily....No doubt though that Vic will get it done
Message was edited by: jsebe10®
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [58]
TigerPulse: 55%
Posts: 128
Joined: 5/20/09
|
Re: McShay thinks Beasley's 220 lbs. This is why I hate this guy
Jan 9, 2015, 5:41 PM
|
|
Or maybe, just maybe--our coaches inflate the stats. McShay and others have said he weighed 220 in the spring. He weighed in before fall camp much higher but I think todd is saying that he lost weight during the season, couldnt keep it on.
At the combine the numbers will come out. He will probably be 6'2 and a half or something and hopefully close to 240 with his same speed. Dont assume an ESPN conspiracy or that McShay is flat out wrong unless you know for a fact (and don't trust coaches, its like a high school coach and every player they coach running a 4.4).
|
|
|
|
|
Aficionado [151]
TigerPulse: 40%
Posts: 615
Joined: 3/7/11
|
Re: McShay thinks Beasley's 220 lbs. This is why I hate this guy
Jan 9, 2015, 5:43 PM
|
|
Sorry it was in the spring as said above . Here is a tweet also stating that
Daniel Jeremiah ? @MoveTheSticks Follow Yes…scouts weighed him at 220 in the spring RT @sgray1989: you think Beasley will have to move to olb?
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3740]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 4195
Joined: 10/11/12
|
Vic didn't look 220 in this picture a year and a half ago
Jan 9, 2015, 5:56 PM
|
|
At the big weigh-in, unless the scales Clemson uses are inaccurate he weighed 235. I saw the video with my own eyes. Vic generally seemed pretty honest when it came to his weight. When reporters would ask him what it was during the season he would always say 235.
Here's Vic at the big weigh-in on July 2013 http://www.tigernet.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=1251187
I saw the video of that one too. This image has not been altered. His upper body was literally thicker than G. Jarrett's.
|
|
|
|
|
Aficionado [151]
TigerPulse: 40%
Posts: 615
Joined: 3/7/11
|
Re: Vic didn't look 220 in this picture a year and a half ago
Jan 9, 2015, 6:01 PM
|
|
"His upper body was literally thicker than G. Jarrett's." Look at his lower body
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4974]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 8239
Joined: 12/9/12
|
|
|
|
Replies: 11
| visibility 1
|
|
|