|
Replies: 24
| visibility 3,391
|
Oculus Spirit [96791]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 29201
Joined: 9/14/05
|
Looking at the 2016 men's varsity football schedule...which
Mar 2, 2016, 1:05 PM
|
|
losses would rank as "Quality Losses" to help us compete with the Bamas of the world?
My vote is FSU.
Sirius replies only.
|
|
|
|
 |
Heisman Winner [139852]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33839
Joined: 12/5/10
|
Does our loss to Bama in the natty help us this season?***
Mar 2, 2016, 1:07 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13359]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9885
Joined: 1/23/06
|
Only if TJ is out for the 1st half of the AU game***
Mar 2, 2016, 2:33 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3427]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2728
Joined: 7/19/13
|
@Auburn Week 1 when nobody knows what to expect
Mar 2, 2016, 1:07 PM
|
|
Plus, we can Fire Batson after the excuses come out that it was too hot in the Bama summer heat for our defense with that tempo they use.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64517]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88956
Joined: 3/27/01
|
Especially the Auburn defense ...
Mar 2, 2016, 1:38 PM
|
|
They'll have to score at least 35 to have any chance to beat us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26326]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 15324
Joined: 1/12/00
|
Maybe we could get Tavon Austin to come stand on our
Mar 2, 2016, 1:43 PM
|
|
sideline and stare at Kevin Steele. That would rattle me if I were Steele.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3427]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2728
Joined: 7/19/13
|
First play HAS to be a jet sweep to Artavis...
Mar 2, 2016, 1:50 PM
|
|
Karma/Hilarious
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [17577]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11050
Joined: 10/13/08
|
Re: First play HAS to be a jet sweep to Artavis...
Mar 2, 2016, 4:07 PM
|
|
Followed by zone reads the rest of the game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1548]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 496
Joined: 1/13/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [9298]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6391
Joined: 11/17/03
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4098]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 10336
Joined: 7/1/97
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [108390]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 64974
Joined: 2/25/06
|
your vote?
Mar 2, 2016, 1:09 PM
|
|
dsp knew the 19th was a mistake.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14451]
TigerPulse: 80%
Posts: 22869
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Looking at the 2016 men's varsity football schedule...which
Mar 2, 2016, 1:10 PM
|
|
WE ARE NOW IN A POSITION THAT NO LOSS IS A QUALITY LOSS. I PUT US IN THE BAMA CATEGORY RECOGNITION WISE BUT NOT TROPHY WISE. OF COURSE WHO CAN SAY THEY ARE IN THAT CATEGORY.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [139852]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33839
Joined: 12/5/10
|
Are you saying we are just as elite as Bama, minus the trophies?
Mar 2, 2016, 1:26 PM
|
|
Did I just black out and wake up on fgf?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2525]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2279
Joined: 9/21/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10402]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 17413
Joined: 8/9/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [90]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 186
Joined: 1/26/16
|
Re: Looking at the 2016 men's varsity football schedule...which
Mar 2, 2016, 1:54 PM
|
|
We can probably take one "quality loss" as long as we win the ACC Championship. We have yet to see a non-conference champion make the playoffs. So not FSU.
So Auburn or Louisville
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [24042]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9772
Joined: 10/7/15
|
Re: Looking at the 2016 men's varsity football schedule...which
Mar 2, 2016, 2:44 PM
|
|
Agreed Hoss55, but only on the (possible) loss to Auburn - UNLESS Auburn 'pulls a USUC' and beats us the first game of the season, then inhales the rest of the year, going 3-9, etc. ....
I don't believe a loss to Louisville would be a 'quality loss' UNLESS they go 11-1. In which case they would probably win the ACC Atlantic, not us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [116]
TigerPulse: 25%
Posts: 305
Joined: 8/27/15
|
Did you see the junior varsity schedule?!? Wow
Mar 2, 2016, 3:20 PM
|
|
it's a killer.??
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1925]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1983
Joined: 8/25/99
|
Yeah
Mar 2, 2016, 3:45 PM
|
|
USuC's varsity team is going to give them a tough game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [116]
TigerPulse: 25%
Posts: 305
Joined: 8/27/15
|
Usuck sux. They always on ur mind? Uga? Unc? Some
Mar 2, 2016, 5:57 PM
|
|
of you got it bad....It was a joke dood. JV... Kind of funny. Unless ur uptight
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3573]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6516
Joined: 6/1/99
|
Problem with losing to FSU is no ACCCG
Mar 2, 2016, 3:34 PM
|
|
and if we make the ACCCG with a loss to FSU, then its likely that FSU loss wasn't "quality." The playoff committee seems to put a lot of emphasis on winning your conference.
I don't know how the 3 way tiebreakers would work if Clemson, UofL and FSU all ended with 1 loss and it was to each other.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2557]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3678
Joined: 2/18/09
|
Re: Problem with losing to FSU is no ACCCG
Mar 3, 2016, 2:57 AM
|
|
|
|
They may lose one to someone they shouldn't, but not 2. We're far more athletic than any other teams in the conference....IMO, I hate it, but NC and NCSt are closing the gap to a degree. If it's less than 8 of the next 10, if not 9, as ACC champs I'd be surprised. JMO. It's about Fla St Women's University and CU right now, but we're slowly taking a chokehold on the conference!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [15492]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18413
Joined: 12/10/14
|
Re: Looking at the 2016 men's varsity football schedule...which
Mar 2, 2016, 5:07 PM
|
|
Do we have a men's junior varsity football team?
If so, how they doin?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26467]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 20616
Joined: 9/2/02
|
Silly topic ... only SEC schools have quality losses. Duh.***
Mar 2, 2016, 8:27 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 24
| visibility 3,391
|
|
|
50
