Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Football Player Update: Clemson named No. 2 WR Corp for 2012
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 17
| visibility 1

Football Player Update: Clemson named No. 2 WR Corp for 2012


Aug 8, 2012, 1:42 PM

 
Clemson named No. 2 WR Corp for 2012

Read Update »


flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Expecting great things out of Nuk this season.***


Aug 8, 2012, 1:43 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I'd say that's a safe expectation***


Aug 8, 2012, 1:52 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Football Player Update: Clemson named No. 2 WR Corp for 2012


Aug 8, 2012, 1:45 PM

ESPNU ranked the Tigers as #1

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

It's clear a lot of these sportswriters haven't been paying


Aug 8, 2012, 1:47 PM

much attention because Nuk has the best hands on the team and would be All Conference at any other school--every article just seems to mention him as an also-ran backup.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

agreed.***


Aug 8, 2012, 1:48 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

It's tough these days knowing which sportswriters actually


Aug 8, 2012, 1:51 PM [ in reply to It's clear a lot of these sportswriters haven't been paying ]

watch college football and those who just look at numbers. This is a case of someone just looking at numbers. Not too mention the fact that Clemson is much deeper than just 2 WRs and isn't that what position rankings are all about?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

What about in the ALL MIGHTY SEC


Aug 8, 2012, 2:10 PM [ in reply to It's clear a lot of these sportswriters haven't been paying ]

*gasp* oh my

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Brad Brownell: more losses than any other coach in school history.


this #### cray***


Aug 8, 2012, 1:49 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I'll take our WR's Corp over anyone's. Most of these


Aug 8, 2012, 1:51 PM

"experts" don't research what they're writing, they take little bits of press and write an article. Anyone that really follows high school football knows how talented Peake and Bryant are. They're definitely on par w/ Watkins from a talent and ability standpoint, and Nuk is a special player himself. And don't ever underestimate how clutch Brown is.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

USC's gus are really, really good too. I'm not really gonna


Aug 8, 2012, 2:34 PM

complain much about us being rated 2nd. Pretty big gap b/t us and everyone else though.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Do you know what you're writing? Have you researched


Aug 8, 2012, 4:00 PM [ in reply to I'll take our WR's Corp over anyone's. Most of these ]

USC's?

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-jospehg.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Have YOU even looked at USC's?


Aug 8, 2012, 4:28 PM

Robert Woods is easily the best with only Sammy or Tavon Austin to rival him. He had a similar year to Sammy. Then you got Marqise Lee who as a freshman put up over 1,000 yards as well. Clemson's WR's are I think the only ones to be able to rival USC's. I think if you graded the WR corps on a 10 point scale USC would be 9.8 and Clemson would be 9.6 with WVU at like 9.0.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I'll take our WR's Corp over anyone's. Most of these


Aug 8, 2012, 4:31 PM [ in reply to I'll take our WR's Corp over anyone's. Most of these ]

No one is saying Bryant and Peake have no skill. They have all the ability in the world to just as good or better than Sammy. They just have not produced on a consistent level as USC's or even Nuk, Brown, and Sammy. Don't get me wrong I'd still take Clemson's over any other group anytime. The upside they have is tremendous.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

after the Auburn game


Aug 8, 2012, 2:11 PM

we will be #1 from all the interviews it seems like the wr corps is on a mission.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Brad Brownell: more losses than any other coach in school history.


a reported 4.24 for Charone Peake


Aug 8, 2012, 5:47 PM

veryyyyyyyyyyy highly unlikey.

That would be a top 3 time in the whole NFL,if not
the fastest time.

#21

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I know one thing. I wouldn't trade with USC or anyone else.***


Aug 8, 2012, 5:54 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Football Player Update: Clemson named No. 2 WR Corp for 2012


Aug 8, 2012, 6:34 PM

They should be number one cause people said Clemson is going to struggle without Sammy. We have other threats such as Nuk Hopkins and Martavis Bryant

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 17
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic