Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Interesting Analysis from BC Website
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 8
| visibility 3,964

Interesting Analysis from BC Website


Oct 6, 2016, 10:41 PM

Here is an interesting breakdown and analysis of the game on Friday night from a BC website.

http://www.bcinterruption.com/2016/10/6/13146830/coachs-corner-evaluating-bc-clemson

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

A straightforward analysis


Oct 6, 2016, 10:57 PM

The only advantage they think they might have is our running game versus their rushing defense. It's not a surprise considering it's their most strongest unit, while Clemson appeared to struggle at running at times.

The score prediction is fair and is somewhat I expected. If we happen to go up by 4 TDs or more, Dabo will send the backups in and that will likely narrow the score difference down to about 3 scores.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Only #38 versus the rush because of three teams we


Oct 6, 2016, 11:06 PM

have faced (AU, GT, and U of L).

I look for that stat to change; starting tomorrow night, with Cook and Conner being the final proving points in our schedule.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Only #38 versus the rush because of three teams we


Oct 7, 2016, 4:53 AM

Louisville skewed our YPG rushing stat .
We completely shut down the bees , and Auburn wasn't much more effective than SCST .

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

DB23


Yep, we shut down two perineal rushing offenses


Oct 7, 2016, 5:06 AM

this year and U of L did get yards on us once the D got winded after some turnovers and quick scores from our offense. Another factor in how our D became tired during the 3rd/4th quarters was missing Bryant, Johnson, Baker and Williams. That and U of L was allowed to hold our D-Line the entire game without one single holding call being called by the officials.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Interesting Analysis from BC Website


Oct 7, 2016, 12:59 AM

That is spot on objective analysis. The only way I see it closer is the (sorry) ray ray type slip of the hand or deflection type turnovers. If I were Dabo , I'd go for the juggler fast and put this game away early.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Why you bringing jugglers into this? They didn't hurt


Oct 7, 2016, 7:40 AM

anybody, and provide good, mindless entertainment, much like Tnet! :)

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


I think he was trying to make a funny mentioning rayray and


Oct 7, 2016, 9:47 AM

juggler in the same sentence. lol

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I like the fact that he says BC cannot run on the edges.


Oct 7, 2016, 9:50 AM

Clemson is strongest in the middle with all of our DTs.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Replies: 8
| visibility 3,964
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic