|
Replies: 11
| visibility 1
|
Legend [15212]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 18245
Joined: 6/10/09
|
If TL had just laid there for 10 seconds after the targeting
Jan 8, 2019, 2:23 PM
|
|
I feel like the booth would've reviewed the hit.
I'm not suggesting he should have done that, but I do think that would've helped get a review.
It should've at least been reviewed. Now, I do think it's BS to throw someone out of the game for that, but that just means the rule needs revised.
|
|
|
|
 |
Legend [19879]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11176
Joined: 9/23/07
|
That you, Jake?
Jan 8, 2019, 2:24 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [93567]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 95370
Joined: 12/25/09
|
He was a running back.
Jan 8, 2019, 2:25 PM
|
|
We'v seen defenders drop their heads to try and knock the ball loose all year without being flagged. Hard as it is to take it wasn't targeting, imo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [15212]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 18245
Joined: 6/10/09
|
I've seen a lot less than that called.
Jan 8, 2019, 2:30 PM
|
|
They've gotta change the automatic ejection rule.
You need to have a warning for first offense that carries over for the entire season. Then the 2nd time is ejection for a half.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
I think that'd be a fair change.
Jan 8, 2019, 2:32 PM
|
|
I think it's be unprecedented in that you'd have to set up a system for tracking these "warnings". Not difficult, I'm sure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [15212]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 18245
Joined: 6/10/09
|
It would be really simple. You just put an asterisk
Jan 8, 2019, 2:36 PM
|
|
next to the guys who have had a warning.
It's only a few guys over the course of the season anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [386]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 598
Joined: 12/30/18
|
I wouldn't say it was intentional, but it was
Jan 8, 2019, 2:50 PM
[ in reply to He was a running back. ] |
|
definitely targeting when you look at the rule.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
All plays are reviewed...
Jan 8, 2019, 2:25 PM
|
|
what you mean, is that they would have stopped play to review for a more significant amount of time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [15212]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 18245
Joined: 6/10/09
|
Yes, they should've stopped play. Replay was poor by ESPN
Jan 8, 2019, 2:32 PM
|
|
last night.
Renfrow, for example, was killed during the 2nd series on the sideline. You couldn't see it on the live broadcast, but on the other broadcast they had great camera angles. Shoved out of bounds, clear PI.
I felt like the ESPN broadcast was trying to cover up a few controversial calls early.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
PI calls are not reviewable.***
Jan 8, 2019, 2:33 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [15212]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 18245
Joined: 6/10/09
|
I'm just speaking toward the ESPN broadcast.
Jan 8, 2019, 2:34 PM
|
|
Sorry, separate topic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [27366]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 26233
Joined: 9/19/11
|
They should have looked at the hit on Tee in the endzone
Jan 8, 2019, 2:47 PM
|
|
also.
He led with his helmet and was trying to take his head off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 11
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
