|
Replies: 8
| visibility 3,196
|
Editor [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43432
Joined: 12/12/12
|
TNET: ESPN analysts split on Clemson ranking
Nov 12, 2017, 11:42 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2006]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2736
Joined: 9/23/12
|
Re: TNET: ESPN analysts split on Clemson ranking
Nov 12, 2017, 12:42 PM
|
|
i guess these guys don't look at the 5 starters missing from clemson defense on Saturday do they? wow..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2883]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2224
Joined: 3/7/06
|
Not sure what they were looking for in our win...
Nov 12, 2017, 6:25 PM
|
|
We did what we needed to get a 17 point win and it should be noted the last score we had was not to drive up the margin of victory but we need to keep our foot on their throats. Even Jimbo noted they " With five minutes to go, we were right there to have a chance, but we let it slip away from of us. Give them credit...they made the plays they needed to to win the game."
The fact we won by 17 should equal a good if not great victory in my opinion. We are everyone's superbowl this year.
Guys not impressed with our win don't understand the situation we were in with a lot of missing pieces against a very determined (and bitter and dirty?) team.
I'll take the big win any day!
Go Tigers!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1016]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 513
Joined: 7/26/17
|
QB play, Explosive play, Coaching Prowess
Nov 12, 2017, 7:37 PM
|
|
That’s what they’re looking for. We all know where we’re lacking. If we had average QB play we would dominate all of college football all the way to a repeat, No Doubt
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [21815]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 15701
Joined: 10/23/12
|
Speaking of qb play, your qb jackie bentlee didn't look
Nov 13, 2017, 6:51 AM
|
|
so hot saturday....
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [9656]
TigerPulse: 69%
Posts: 9370
Joined: 1/18/17
|
None of these guys are on the committee, correct?
1
Nov 12, 2017, 7:40 PM
|
|
So.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [55241]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 58317
Joined: 7/18/07
|
Re: TNET: ESPN analysts split on Clemson ranking
Nov 12, 2017, 9:34 PM
|
|
I don't have a problem with them not liking KB's deep ball bc I don't like it either with big hopes that the coaches don't call anymore deep ball plays for him bc, he sure as h&ll isn't a deep ball threat!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2750]
TigerPulse: 91%
Posts: 5039
Joined: 10/18/06
|
Heather Dinich gets it . . .
Nov 13, 2017, 10:00 AM
|
|
I don't know why Dinich catches so much grief, she gets the idea of the "whole body of work," as opposed to just over-reacting and over-weighting the last outing, and she mentions that a lot. She ranked Clemson #2 right now and that's the right call. Herbie usually is pretty level-headed in similar fashion, but he's got us down at #4 now, seemingly being a captive to the moment regarding Miami. I'm not saying he's biased, b/c I don't think he is, but I think he's over-emphasizing the last game for Miami and over-emphasizing OU's offensive prowess in order to justify those results.
Now, I don't deny that Miami and OU are playing better, in general right now, than Clemson. But I also know that the body of work is broader than the last couple of weeks, and Clemson has beaten 6 teams with winning records, and the Auburn win is looking better than OU's Ohio State win. Of course, their loss is not as bad as ours, so that point is in their favor, but that's just one aspect of the analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64867]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33141
Joined: 12/3/03
|
If they are actually looking for the 4 beat TEAMS, we should
Nov 13, 2017, 2:25 PM
|
|
get some extra credit for playing a bad game, and STILL winning by 17 points in the end. They gave BAMA extra credit for barely beating the Cowbells.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 8
| visibility 3,196
|
|
|
50
