»
Topic: If Patent Office can stop Redskin usage, can they PAWerize us?
Replies: 15   Last Post: Jun 19, 2014 2:18 PM by: etangeman
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.


[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 15  

If Patent Office can stop Redskin usage, can they PAWerize us?

[8]
Posted: Jun 19, 2014 12:10 AM
 

Saying...our GOV has gotten so out of control and Communist-like, anything is possible with this crowd we have now running our government..

like telling Clemson it can't use the PAW logo anymore since other Tigers don't like it being used out of context..as well as other Animals/Indians/People/Feet/Insects/Weather Patterns are scared of the PAW..like Chickens, Deacons, Noles, Tar Heels, Bees, Cardinals, Hurricanes, etc.

What do you say?! GoTiGERs1


Message was edited by: lightbulbbill®


2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

To All CLEMSON TiGERS..Sending you Bright Light from the Carolina Coast and hoping you get to witness a huge Orange sunset tonight. Go Tigers!


Without LbB in the ROH, I think the gov sux.

[1]
Posted: Jun 19, 2014 12:13 AM
 

It's a disservice...wait..why did four blacked out SUV's pull up in my driveway.......did I say something... hang on, let me answer the door...

2020 orange level member

Proof that LbB belongs in the ROH link

[1]
Posted: Jun 19, 2014 12:28 AM
 

http://www.tigernet.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=1349548

And Hartins. Seriously, it's sirius Thursday and you guys deserve a curtain call. From one righter to annuder, thanx.
;)

2020 orange level member

Heyyy, let's change Tar Heels to TURD-HOLES...

[1]
Posted: Jun 19, 2014 12:57 AM
 

...and FIRE SWOFFORD!!! ;)


Re: If Patent Office can stop Redskin usage, can they PAWerize us?


Posted: Jun 19, 2014 12:59 AM
 

Bill it will be over in 11/2 years and it will correct itself. Then the other party will get over confident and over reach and they will lose. It's called democracy and it will work over the long term but will have ups and downs.


They didn't stop the usage of "Redskins"


Posted: Jun 19, 2014 7:40 AM
 

They said it was no longer protected by copyright law. Thus anyone can use the term (not the team logo) for marketing or revenue purposes.


no intent there at all.***

[3]
Posted: Jun 19, 2014 7:46 AM
 



2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg


No one is that ignorant.


Posted: Jun 19, 2014 8:44 AM
 

It has to be obstinance.

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

it's not a matter of ignorance, it's a matter of people

[1]
Posted: Jun 19, 2014 8:57 AM
 

believing the fed agency is in the right and has just left the decision up to snyder.

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg


Not claiming what the intent was


Posted: Jun 19, 2014 10:14 AM
 

There is certainly an agenda, I just prefer to see facts discussed, not hyperbole.


The fact is this is an overt act by the federal government

[2]
Posted: Jun 19, 2014 10:17 AM
 

to coerce a private owner to change a "name" they find offensive.

discuss.

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg


Much as the emancipation proclaimation


Posted: Jun 19, 2014 11:21 AM
 

was a presidential decree (not a law) freeing slaves in rebelling states. Let's not act like the executive branch has never before or never will again influence laws without the support or approval of congress.

You may or may not support the issue, but to make this out to be an issue of an overbearing government is a bit of a reach in my opinion. These tactics are used all the time by both parties to advance their agendas.


Saying the travesty existed prior doesn't warm me where

[1]
Posted: Jun 19, 2014 11:29 AM
 

i need it most. We're because of people that said it was OK then, so it's OK now.

It's a travesty of justice or due process or unbridled, ungranted power none the less.

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg


I agree

[1]
Posted: Jun 19, 2014 1:39 PM
 

but things like this were rarely mentioned on tigernet under prior administrations. I feel most people don't really care about the core issue of bypassing the legislative process as long as it suits their politics. However when it doesn't, suddenly it becomes a travesty of government.


i don't go to the p&r/lunge/general boards for that reason.


Posted: Jun 19, 2014 2:06 PM
 

i don't know if we have the same remedy, but i certainly agree with you on the far too often, political nature of things.

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg


Re: I'm Offended


Posted: Jun 19, 2014 2:18 PM
 

by the word "Gamecocks" I believe Obama's patent office should ban the Gamecocks.


Replies: 15  

TIGER TICKETS

FB GAME: Season Tickets
FOR SALE: Two for sale lower south sec:H row:II seats 13,15(about 18 yard line) about 10 steps below the porta...

Buy or Sell CU Tickets and More in Tiger Tickets!

[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
1145 people have read this post