Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Football Update: ESPN: Clemson Still Looking For No. 2 WR
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 24
| visibility 1

Football Update: ESPN: Clemson Still Looking For No. 2 WR


Oct 17, 2013, 11:33 AM

ESPN: Clemson Still Looking For No. 2 WR

Read Update »


flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Football Update: ESPN: Clemson Still Looking For No. 2 WR


Oct 17, 2013, 11:33 AM

Ehh.. I dont know. I think AH, MB and MW are doing a good job here.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Man to have Peake and Hopkins this year WOW!!!!!!!***


Oct 17, 2013, 6:15 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Found #2 receiver


Oct 17, 2013, 11:35 AM
sw.jpg(8.5 K)



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

My real #2 receiver


Oct 17, 2013, 12:38 PM

1. Sammy Watkins
2. M. Bryant
2. Humphries
2. Mike Williams

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

All these guys to catch the ball...


Oct 17, 2013, 10:41 PM

# RECEIVING G-S Rec Yards Y/Rec Rec/G Y/G TD 20+

2 Watkins 6-6 36 582 16.2 6.0 97.0 4 7
13 Humphries 6-4 24 319 13.3 4.0 53.2 2 5
1 Bryant 6-5 17 316 18.6 2.8 52.7 3 8
5 GHopper 5-0 16 117 7.3 3.2 23.4 2 2
81 Seckinger 6-5 12 147 12.3 2.0 24.5 2 0
19 Peake 2-2 8 84 10.5 4.0 42.0 1 1
7 Williams 6-2 8 118 14.8 1.3 19.7 1 2
25 McDowell 6-5 8 48 6.0 1.3 8.0 0 0
16 Leggett 4-0 4 44 11.0 1.0 11.0 1 0
86 Cooper 5-0 4 40 10.0 0.8 8.0 1 0
22 Howard 6-0 4 97 24.3 0.7 16.2 1 1
24 Brooks 6-0 4 75 18.8 0.7 12.5 1 2

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


All I can think about when I see her


Oct 17, 2013, 11:36 AM

Is man, a Roast Beef sandwich on rye bread sure would be nice right now. Light on the mayo please.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

^^^NSFW^^^***


Oct 17, 2013, 11:42 AM



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

HD is a #2 Receiver***


Oct 17, 2013, 11:42 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You Got It Close, She Receives in the #2 Hole***


Oct 17, 2013, 11:55 AM



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Our supposed depth at wide receiver was a myth.***


Oct 17, 2013, 11:43 AM



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Yea, they're just plain pathetic aren't they? Watch.***


Oct 17, 2013, 11:48 AM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


They're good.


Oct 17, 2013, 11:52 AM

Just not deep.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I'm not sure we ever thought we were that deep...


Oct 17, 2013, 12:13 PM [ in reply to Our supposed depth at wide receiver was a myth.*** ]

it was just that the front line talent was about as good as anybody's anywhere. We're suffering a little bit without Peake, but if you actually look at the numbers, Bryant isn't far behind FSU's #2 WR even though he barely played against Wake.

A lot of the FSU people keep talking about Kelvin Benjamin, but he has less yards than Bryant does right now. The only real advantage over us that they have right now is that both Greene and Shaw are reliable go- to guys. Clemson's only really reliable receiver thus far has been Watkins, with both Humphries and Bryant making big plays at times.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Maybe - but how many teams are deeper?


Oct 17, 2013, 12:23 PM [ in reply to Our supposed depth at wide receiver was a myth.*** ]

Watkins, Bryant, Peake, Humphries, Williams, Hopper, Green, Porter, Rodriguiez, and Forbush.

I don't think you'll find anybody whose top 6 is better than ours (and yes I realize Peake is out). As far as the last 4 on the list, I know they are not superstars (at this point, at least), but who has WRs that deep on the depth chart who are better?

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard."
- H. L. Mencken


Coaches made a major mistake not taking Q. Davis


Oct 17, 2013, 5:33 PM [ in reply to Our supposed depth at wide receiver was a myth.*** ]

He wanted to come to Clemson and the coaches just simply missed on him. He would clearly be a GREAT #2 on our team.

I also think some of our WR issues are related to the one VERY strong class we signed in big numbers. I think HS WR's and perhaps our coaches felt like we were set for 3-4 years, when in fact we need to keep bringing in 2 WR's regardless of the current situation.

Dabo is overall doing a fantastic job but his roster management can clearly be improved upon. I'm hopeful we will see him progress in this area as he has in others.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgtbn_110.gif flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Further Clueless Reporting From The Sammich


Oct 17, 2013, 11:54 AM

# 2 Grisham
# 2a Bryant

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Further clueless reporting from morbidtiger


Oct 17, 2013, 12:03 PM

Grisham is not on this Clemson team..

But Adam Humphries is.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsonrulez08.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Please forgive me, @IneligibleUser


Re: Further clueless reporting from morbidtiger


Oct 17, 2013, 12:19 PM

I guess white boys all look alike

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I wouldn't really say either of them are reliable #2s


Oct 17, 2013, 12:14 PM [ in reply to Further Clueless Reporting From The Sammich ]

At least not like Shaw is a #2 for FSU. They can make themselves into that #2 guy in this game, though.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

adam is by far


Oct 17, 2013, 12:30 PM

the most sure handed receiver we have. Sammy has his drops Bryant has his drops but if boyd throws a catchable ball to adam it is caught. now when it comes to yards after the catch Sammy is the man. when it comes to the deep threat Sammy and Bryant are the guys. but when it comes to needing 10-15 yards adam is the man. he wont get the most yards after catch but he will catch the ball. he reminds me of the role brown did for us the past few seasons.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

TOTALLY RACIST I BET YOU THINK ALL WHITE PEOPLE LOOK ALIKE***


Oct 17, 2013, 10:49 PM [ in reply to Further Clueless Reporting From The Sammich ]



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

and here I thought Kiper Jr was the only one hitting acid.


Oct 17, 2013, 6:20 PM

Reallly? I know they have to stretch things to fill the dead air but seriously. They'd be better off reading from the phone book.

OR...

ESPN has taken it upon themselves to literally call you out, Montavis...oh yes they did

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

A No. 2 WR is overrated when you've got so many targets


Oct 17, 2013, 6:27 PM

It could be Bryant. Or it could be Hopper. Or it could be....

I just can't find a reason to be at all concerned when you can have ends and even backs go out and have some big games catching balls tossed by Boyd. Humphries is a prime example. And then Seckinger. But even MacDowell and Brooks have 'received' a few.

When you can send Watkins and Bryant out as decoys for heavy coverage and STILL have throwing options, then I suspect we are okay.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I would agree with you IF


Oct 17, 2013, 6:45 PM

we had a better running game. We certainly are not in the poor house at WR as it is a very good group overall. Just need somebody to be THE GUY that Boyd can look to when we need a big play and Sammy is double/triple covered.

Let's hope we find that GUY Saturday nite.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgtbn_110.gif flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 24
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic