|
Replies: 13
| visibility 1,799
|
All-TigerNet [13190]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 19419
Joined: 9/27/04
|
I would be interested in seeing the recruiting rankings
Feb 7, 2014, 7:49 PM
|
|
In August, when all of the phantom 4* players with no chance to actually enroll are removed from the rankings. I think we might lose 1 or 2 to prep school, but I'm betting some schools will be losing some to JuCo or just losing them in general. What happened on Wednesday does not matter until the players actually get accepted into school.
Message was edited by: drewtigeralum03®
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2836]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3053
Joined: 2/2/11
|
Re: I would be interested in seeing the recruiting rankings
Feb 7, 2014, 8:09 PM
|
|
7 of the top 10 are schools from the SECheat. Everyone of those will qualify. What's going to be interesting is the players they cut.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [22965]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 25005
Joined: 6/24/99
|
You don't actually think something as minor as
Feb 7, 2014, 8:30 PM
|
|
academic qualification is going to prevent an SEC school (or unc) from admitting a talented athlete, do ya??...:~)
Message was edited by: tigrjm76®
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4098]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 10336
Joined: 7/1/97
|
Re: You don't actually think something as minor as
Feb 7, 2014, 8:39 PM
|
|
this is THE POST!!!!!!!!!! foolish to expect there to be any changes to the "listed" rankings or that academics will even be a consideration!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11934]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16363
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Even better ... re-rank them in 5 years ...
Feb 8, 2014, 2:19 PM
|
|
What players look like as HS seniors means very little compared to what they look like as college seniors. Or early NFL draftees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [919]
TigerPulse: 43%
Posts: 2275
Joined: 3/19/09
|
Re: Even better ... re-rank them in 5 years ...
Feb 8, 2014, 2:43 PM
|
|
You guys do realize that it is not the schools but the NCAA clearing house that clears players.
You also realize the requirements are exactly the same for every school in the ACC and the SEC. There is no difference is NCAA admission requirements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virtuoso [656]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 811
Joined: 8/9/13
|
How is that relevant to what he said at all?***
Feb 8, 2014, 2:45 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [919]
TigerPulse: 43%
Posts: 2275
Joined: 3/19/09
|
Re: How is that relevant to what he said at all?***
Feb 8, 2014, 2:49 PM
|
|
Because Jim said clearly that SEC schools do not allow academics to keep athletes out of school.
That is factually wrong.
The School has ZERO impact on an athlete being cleared to play sports in ANY school.
Simple really what Jim posted wring and yet another example of posting that are 100% wrong that because the TRUTH when posted enough here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virtuoso [656]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 811
Joined: 8/9/13
|
But you replied to apextiger...***
Feb 8, 2014, 3:02 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [919]
TigerPulse: 43%
Posts: 2275
Joined: 3/19/09
|
Re: But you replied to apextiger...***
Feb 8, 2014, 3:03 PM
|
|
My apologies.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virtuoso [656]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 811
Joined: 8/9/13
|
I didn't read Jim's post so I had the confuses***
Feb 8, 2014, 3:04 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member [23]
TigerPulse: 26%
Posts: 90
Joined: 1/17/07
|
Re: I would be interested in seeing the recruiting rankings
Feb 8, 2014, 3:13 PM
|
|
Why worry about it? Recruiting rankings are like preseason polls. They mean very little.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13190]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 19419
Joined: 9/27/04
|
Generally speaking, recruiting = winning
Feb 8, 2014, 4:30 PM
|
|
Also, some teams like to attempt to appease the fan base by signing 4* players they know they can't get into school.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4098]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 10336
Joined: 7/1/97
|
Re: Generally speaking, recruiting = winning
Feb 8, 2014, 5:03 PM
|
|
very good post.. recruiting is WAY ahead of whatever might be in 2nd place!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 13
| visibility 1,799
|
|
|
50
