|
Replies: 49
| visibility 1
|
Legend [17786]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13387
Joined: 9/16/03
|
|
|
|
 |
Legend [15216]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 18247
Joined: 6/10/09
|
Sounds like 2 gays pillow fighting.
Jun 1, 2016, 9:32 AM
|
|
weirdos
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10572]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7143
Joined: 11/11/02
|
Stick to lacrosse pal--
Jun 1, 2016, 9:43 AM
|
|
And hope Teflon John doesn't toss those teams under the bus to save his basketball program
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3573]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6516
Joined: 6/1/99
|
UNC had the highest RPI ever that didn't make the NCAA
Jun 1, 2016, 9:47 AM
|
|
But that also proves that RPI isn't the end all be all measurement. They were 4-6 in ACC series with series wins over Pitt, Duke, VT and ND. Their "top 50 wins" almost all came in series where they lost 1-2.
SC has a resume of a B student that took all average classes. UNC has the resume of a B student that got Ds in all of their honors courses and As in their underwater basket weaving classes. (I figured I'd use an analogy about classes and honors level courses to confuse both Carolinas.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [38425]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33200
Joined: 7/28/11
|
Re: UNC had the highest RPI ever that didn't make the NCAA
Jun 1, 2016, 5:38 PM
|
|
In my eye it's an indicator of how very strong southern college baseball is . The ACC/SeC stranglehold on the rest of the country is growing and is now excluding some pretty solid teams , like UNCheat .
Any other year and UNC is a 3 seed at a regional in Baton Rouge or Columbus .
It's tough , and he's right but what're ya gonna do?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [60215]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42553
Joined: 11/30/98
|
the only issue I have with the tourney non-qualify
Jun 1, 2016, 9:54 AM
|
|
being basically the deciding factor is that the ACC only lets 10 teams make it. The SEC takes 12 teams in its tourney (they have 4 play-in games, where we have 2). UNC makes it in without question if the ACC used the SEC format.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: the only issue I have with the tourney non-qualify
Jun 1, 2016, 10:10 AM
|
|
The ACC got 10 teams in the tournament. They wouldn't have gotten another in with two more teams in the conference tournament.
I don't think any conference has ever gotten 11 teams in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4947]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6981
Joined: 10/12/06
|
Re: the only issue I have with the tourney non-qualify
Jun 1, 2016, 10:46 AM
|
|
I think that depends on the outcome of the Tournament. If UNC wins a couple games and takes out a GT or a Duke I think 11 make it. If they beat BC then maybe it is still 10 teams, but either way unless UNC lost to a bad team in game 1 I think they are in the field.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [60215]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42553
Joined: 11/30/98
|
probably not - but UNC would have gotten in over WF
Jun 1, 2016, 10:49 AM
[ in reply to Re: the only issue I have with the tourney non-qualify ] |
|
or BC or somebody, because they had a #18 RPI. That's borderline #1 seed territory. It seems that UNC not making the ACC Tourney was THE reason they didn't get a bid. My point was that if ACC had a 12-team tourney they would probably have made it in.
and for the record - I am HAPPY UNC didn't get in. The hell with a TarHole.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3820]
TigerPulse: 82%
Posts: 4395
Joined: 12/24/09
|
SCAR didn't have diddly...
Jun 1, 2016, 9:58 AM
|
|
stop giving a pass to a team that had 26 of 42 wins against 100+ rated teams.
Myrtle Beach High would have had 40+ wins against the schedule.
THE SEC has done in baseball exactly what it does in football -
play a decent in-conference schedule plus a crap OOC schedule,
and then let it's political clout take over.
If you're scared to play it on the field,
then even crappy Power 5 teams should step in front of you to the head of the line.
If UNCheat didn't deserve to make the tournament then neither did USuCk!
15-0... suck it Coots!
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6280]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 12979
Joined: 4/21/15
|
Re: SCAR didn't have diddly...
Jun 1, 2016, 10:03 AM
|
|
One game in a baseball season doesn't mean too much. That is the dumbest comment I have ever read.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3820]
TigerPulse: 82%
Posts: 4395
Joined: 12/24/09
|
UNCheat beat USuCk every time they played them....
Jun 1, 2016, 10:37 AM
|
|
on the field, and that's what counts.
What you think and what you perceive don't mean diddly.
People like you put too much stock in their own opinions -
you think, and therefore you are. Whatever.
You think crap, and therefore you are crap.
If USuCk had played in the ACC, they'd likely have missed the tournament too,
because unlike the SEC, the ACC didn't have patsies like
100+ RPI Arkansas and Missouri to pad their win total.
That's right: USuCk was only 14-9 in the SEC against Top 100 teams.
And only went 5-4 in series, and unlike Clemson, lost series to teams outside the Top 25. Not so good, huh?
In the end, even the SEC homers at D1 Baseball recognized
that USuCk's schedule was the only reason they won 40+ games. Eff you...
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6280]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 12979
Joined: 4/21/15
|
Re: UNCheat beat USuCk every time they played them....
Jun 1, 2016, 10:42 AM
|
|
Lmao. You are crazy dude! I'm just saying you can't say just because they lost to UNC and UNc didn't make the tourny that they shouldn't be in it as well. That is dumb. Now your starting to come up with some decent reasons. That being said a 40+ win team that is hosting a regional should deff be in the tourny. You saying they should not is idiotic. Idc how much you hate Usuck they are a solid baseball team and have been for years and years. You trying to say they shouldn't have made the tourny??? Are you out of your mind?
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: UNCheat beat USuCk every time they played them....
Jun 1, 2016, 10:48 AM
|
|
His meltdown will be amazing if Clemson loses to USC in the supers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3820]
TigerPulse: 82%
Posts: 4395
Joined: 12/24/09
|
I have no idea if Clemson will win the Supers...
Jun 1, 2016, 10:57 AM
|
|
jus string the facts that UNCheat's and Clemson's schedule
were both far superior to USuCk's.
And Head-to-Head,
UNCheat and Clemson kicked USuCk's ###.
Them's the facts.
If you want to debate your opinions, go ahead and be my guest.
Just know, we can smell it when your opinions start to stink of BS.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: I have no idea if Clemson will win the Supers...
Jun 1, 2016, 11:09 AM
|
|
The facts are we went 42-15 with the 19th hardest schedule. UNC went 34-21 with the 8th hardest schedule. 11 spots doesn't make that difference.
Congrats unc beat us on a midweek game. We once lost to Francis Marion in a midweek game and played for a national championship in the same year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6280]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 12979
Joined: 4/21/15
|
Re: I have no idea if Clemson will win the Supers...
Jun 1, 2016, 11:33 AM
|
|
Unc should be in as a 2 or 3 seed atleast but chit happens and you move on. They should have won more games.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6280]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 12979
Joined: 4/21/15
|
Re: UNCheat beat USuCk every time they played them....
Jun 1, 2016, 11:00 AM
[ in reply to Re: UNCheat beat USuCk every time they played them.... ] |
|
I hope y'all don't make it out of your regional! I believe we can win a series against the ##### again but id rather not have to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [24538]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 15111
Joined: 2/13/15
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1845]
TigerPulse: 83%
Posts: 2788
Joined: 12/14/15
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [238]
TigerPulse: 40%
Posts: 704
Joined: 9/7/14
|
He doesn't realize how baseball works.
Jun 1, 2016, 12:47 PM
[ in reply to Re: UNCheat beat USuCk every time they played them.... ] |
|
There are plenty of valid stats and reasons why SCar shouldn't have and didn't get a national seed. But 1 game against a UNC team has no bearing on that whatsoever. In MLB, even the best teams lose 60 games a season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6280]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 12979
Joined: 4/21/15
|
Re: He doesn't realize how baseball works.
Jun 1, 2016, 2:25 PM
|
|
Yes I would be willing to bet if they played again it would not be 15-0.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6280]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 12979
Joined: 4/21/15
|
Re: UNCheat beat USuCk every time they played them....
Jun 1, 2016, 10:44 AM
[ in reply to UNCheat beat USuCk every time they played them.... ] |
|
It's not my opinion. It is college baseballs opinion! They are hosting a regional. Your the only DA who thinks they shouldn't have made the tournament.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3820]
TigerPulse: 82%
Posts: 4395
Joined: 12/24/09
|
didn't say USuCk shouldn't have been in the tourney...
Jun 1, 2016, 10:59 AM
|
|
just said, UNCheat had better schedule than USuCk did,
and if the Committee wanted to exclude someone
then USuCk should have been behind UNCheat on that list -
like a lot of SEC teams.
Also said UNCheat would have had 40+ was with USuCk's schedule too...
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6280]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 12979
Joined: 4/21/15
|
Re: didn't say USuCk shouldn't have been in the tourney...
Jun 1, 2016, 11:03 AM
|
|
You said if UnC isn't in then USuck shouldn't be in. Which UnC isn't in so your saying Usuck shouldn't be in. Either way the sec is a very good conference and Usuck did very well in it. They have 42 wins. They did flop in the tourny and I wouldn't have a problem if UNc was in and Usuck was a 2 seed. Tradition helps them too I believe to get the host. They are a good team tho don't act like they are not good. It doesn't matter the scheduale over 40 wins is impressive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [17626]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11052
Joined: 10/13/08
|
Are there rings for winning SEC East?
Jun 1, 2016, 10:02 AM
|
|
Asking for USC-1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6280]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 12979
Joined: 4/21/15
|
Re: UNC Coach takes shot at SCAR Baseball
Jun 1, 2016, 10:03 AM
|
|
So the SEC has divisions in baseball?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2783]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3409
Joined: 4/14/11
|
Another tallest midget contest...
Jun 1, 2016, 10:06 AM
|
|
|
|
nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4947]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6981
Joined: 10/12/06
|
Re: Another tallest midget contest...
Jun 1, 2016, 10:48 AM
|
|
Can someone put CFB shirts on these guys?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11024]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9048
Joined: 2/22/00
|
If only UNC
Jun 1, 2016, 11:05 AM
|
|
played in a weakass conference......
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2679]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2127
Joined: 10/29/99
|
Re: "An H2H Win"
Jun 1, 2016, 11:09 AM
|
|
Did one of their tutors write that?
I mean - I appreciate the dig at SCar, but basic grammar would be nice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [49613]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 30357
Joined: 12/10/98
|
The Heels have a legitimate gripe...
Jun 1, 2016, 11:52 AM
|
|
...but it's not with the Capons.
If I had to guess, the selection crew was trying to figure out how to put the Heels in a region that didn't already have an ACC presence.
In the end, they just threw up their hands and picked Nebraska instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3820]
TigerPulse: 82%
Posts: 4395
Joined: 12/24/09
|
I personally agree with the thought that if you can't finish
Jun 1, 2016, 2:14 PM
|
|
in the Top 10 of your own conference,
then you don't deserve a chance at the National Title either.
The regular season has to have some meaning at least.
I just don't get why people give the SEC such a pass on its scheduling.
In the end, the Holes' coach is right:
UNC's schedule was better than USuCk's, and by a mile....
and there's nothing to say that USuCk wouldn't have been in the same shape record-wise
if they had actually played a meaningful schedule.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: I personally agree with the thought that if you can't finish
Jun 1, 2016, 2:51 PM
|
|
You're arguing the 19th toughest schedule in the country was unacceptable.
You don't find that absurd?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [49613]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 30357
Joined: 12/10/98
|
Like I said, the gripe isn't with y'all ...
Jun 1, 2016, 2:56 PM
|
|
...It's with whoever decided Nebraska was a better choice then UNC.
It will be up to us to show folks what a silly choice this was. Unless WCU finishes them first.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: Like I said, the gripe isn't with y'all ...
Jun 1, 2016, 3:18 PM
|
|
Not sure how losing to Clemson in a super would show we were undeserving.
But yes if we lost to western Carolina in the super that would be disheartening.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2516]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 3358
Joined: 4/11/02
|
I believe he was talking about Nebraska
Jun 1, 2016, 4:32 PM
|
|
OSU beats Nebraska, Clemson beats WCU, WCU beats nebraska. see?
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6280]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 12979
Joined: 4/21/15
|
Re: I believe he was talking about Nebraska
Jun 1, 2016, 4:37 PM
|
|
Hey hey be easy. Simple math isn't that simple for those living in Coot land.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16132]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26434
Joined: 11/18/03
|
So eager to flame that you don't even understand what you're
Jun 1, 2016, 4:58 PM
|
|
arguing against? Truly a loser
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [49613]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 30357
Joined: 12/10/98
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3820]
TigerPulse: 82%
Posts: 4395
Joined: 12/24/09
|
pardon me Rev, but I beg to differ...
Jun 1, 2016, 6:39 PM
[ in reply to Like I said, the gripe isn't with y'all ... ] |
|
USuCk's OOC SOS was 140+
not the #19 the Coots want to suggest.
then they played 2 full series against SEC comp that was rated 100+ RPI.
Coots don't want facts,
they just want us to kiss their 2010/2011 Natl Champ rings regardless
what they're actually doing today.
I don't generally mind Coots - just Coots who lie....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3820]
TigerPulse: 82%
Posts: 4395
Joined: 12/24/09
|
how in the hail is 26 out of 42 wins in the 100+ RPI
Jun 1, 2016, 6:36 PM
[ in reply to Re: I personally agree with the thought that if you can't finish ] |
|
also the 19th toughest SOS??!!
bull effin' sheatt !!
all you've done is point out specifically how over-valued
the in-conference schedule for the SEC is! nothing more!
In fact your out-of-conference SOS was like 145, not effin' 19.
take your arrogance bull-sheatt on down the road Coot....
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: how in the hail is 26 out of 42 wins in the 100+ RPI
Jun 1, 2016, 6:48 PM
|
|
Lol you say we don't want the fact but when you're presente with facts you respond that the facts are biased toward the SEC.
Jeez.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16132]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26434
Joined: 11/18/03
|
you could always just LEAVE chickensh!t...so you're not
Jun 1, 2016, 6:50 PM
|
|
without options if you don't like what he has to say on a TIGER board
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: you could always just LEAVE chickensh!t...so you're not
Jun 1, 2016, 6:53 PM
|
|
You've made your opinion known. You can stop flooding the board with your trolling CM Shack.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16132]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26434
Joined: 11/18/03
|
ooooooooooh the irony...Chickensh!t troll tells me that I
Jun 1, 2016, 7:02 PM
|
|
am flooding the board? #### me that's rich....Are you under the assumption that anybody here doesn't know YOUR opinion?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1845]
TigerPulse: 83%
Posts: 2788
Joined: 12/14/15
|
Re: UNC Coach takes shot at SCAR Baseball
Jun 1, 2016, 2:05 PM
|
|
And I don't think this is really Mike Fox. Think someone just made an account with his picture. I hope yall have already figured that out
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4999]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 8253
Joined: 12/9/12
|
Re: UNC Coach takes shot at SCAR Baseball
Jun 1, 2016, 5:51 PM
|
|
What is with this whole "we won the SEC East" sh*t? It literally only counts towards conference tournament seeding and nothing else!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [38425]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33200
Joined: 7/28/11
|
L7
Jun 1, 2016, 6:07 PM
|
|
Looks like the tournament commitee considers the 5th place ACC team better than the SEC East Champs ...judging by the tournament seedings and all .
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 49
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
