Replies: 16
| visibility 1
|
Orange Blooded [2432]
TigerPulse: 76%
Posts: 3108
Joined: 6/21/11
|
Why Not Dabo?
Oct 7, 2013, 6:27 PM
|
|
Dabo always said , why not Clemson?
Now, here is a quote for you Dabo: "Why Not Dabo?"
Why not Dabo to be the next Saban?
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [24763]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42484
Joined: 7/31/10
|
Dabo is Dabo. Don't compare him to Nicki Satan.***
Oct 7, 2013, 6:40 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [595]
TigerPulse: 41%
Posts: 939
Joined: 5/28/03
|
Re: Why Not Dabo?
Oct 7, 2013, 6:44 PM
|
|
cause he can't beat the chickens and he ain't won his division yet. Dabo can't carry Saban's briefcase.
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [24763]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42484
Joined: 7/31/10
|
Dumduck, you need to check you're history. As far as Satan's
Oct 7, 2013, 6:48 PM
|
|
briefcase, he doesn't want to be somebody's PED mule.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1188]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 1700
Joined: 1/14/12
|
Re: Why Not Dabo?
Oct 7, 2013, 6:59 PM
[ in reply to Re: Why Not Dabo? ] |
|
I don't know if you are a coot or a ######. Dabo has simply not had enough time to build a resume to match Saban's, but he is well on his way. I would not trade Dabo for THREE Sabans.
By the way, Dabo HAS won his division, and he will get the dirt ###### monkey off his back in game 12 this year.
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [245]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 291
Joined: 1/30/10
|
Re: Why Not Dabo?
Oct 7, 2013, 7:27 PM
|
|
"I don't know if you are a coot or a ######." You realize that these two words are NOT mutually exclusive. Correct? Ie. coot = ######.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2432]
TigerPulse: 76%
Posts: 3108
Joined: 6/21/11
|
what the heck are you talking about
Oct 7, 2013, 7:01 PM
[ in reply to Re: Why Not Dabo? ] |
|
He actually one it once and last year he was tied with FSU by the way. We had a loss and they did too against NCST and hence we both won the division but they moved ahead to the ACC championship in virtue of the win against us.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6320]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5112
Joined: 7/19/13
|
Riddle me this
Oct 7, 2013, 7:04 PM
[ in reply to Re: Why Not Dabo? ] |
|
How does one win a Conference without winning the division?
You ain't a smart feller are ya?
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [57077]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 39680
Joined: 11/12/04
|
but Bama can win a NC without winning their conference. Go figure.***
Oct 7, 2013, 7:38 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [130]
TigerPulse: 93%
Posts: 545
Joined: 7/13/10
|
Re: Riddle me this
Oct 7, 2013, 7:39 PM
[ in reply to Riddle me this ] |
|
Dagnabbit!
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [58411]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 46322
Joined: 4/23/00
|
Look here doofus . . . Dabo vs. Saban
Oct 7, 2013, 7:32 PM
[ in reply to Re: Why Not Dabo? ] |
|
thru their first 66 games:
Saban: 40-25-1 Conference titles: 1 (at Toledo) Bowl record: 0-3 Top ten finishes: 0 Record vs. top 15 teams: 5-7
Dabo: 45-21 Conference titles: 1 Bowl record: 2-3 Top ten finishes: 1 Record vs. top 15 teams: 7-7
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6321]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5728
Joined: 11/2/08
|
please don't use facts in here***
Oct 7, 2013, 7:41 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1660]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 3659
Joined: 9/16/07
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2432]
TigerPulse: 76%
Posts: 3108
Joined: 6/21/11
|
Somebody (no link) posted the first 6 years of Saban
Oct 7, 2013, 6:53 PM
|
|
vs Dabo..
Actually DABO is ahead of Saban so far as achievements.
If someone has that post, I do appreciate it if you repost it.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [58411]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 46322
Joined: 4/23/00
|
See above***
Oct 7, 2013, 7:34 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2432]
TigerPulse: 76%
Posts: 3108
Joined: 6/21/11
|
thank you -- thumb up back at you***
Oct 7, 2013, 7:37 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [649]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 1031
Joined: 9/30/08
|
Hasn't won his division yet!?
Oct 7, 2013, 7:08 PM
|
|
Actually he has won it 3 times if you count last year and has won the conference. How full was Sabans briefcase prior to Lsu? How many national championships did he win at Michigan State, because that would be the point of his career that Dabo is currently experiencing.
|
|
|
|
Replies: 16
| visibility 1
|
|
|