Replies: 16
| visibility 1
|
110%er [5373]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4038
Joined: 9/26/00
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [23693]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 36824
Joined: 8/19/03
|
Yes, but...
Apr 27, 2012, 2:44 PM
|
|
it's a SEVERE slap on the wrist.
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [2]
TigerPulse: 11%
Posts: 10
Joined: 2/14/12
|
Re: Yes, but...
Apr 27, 2012, 2:47 PM
|
|
Well yes, but most of the penalties were self-imposed. The 3 years of probation, while steep, wasn't much of a surprise and nothing that will severely hamper the football program.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1053]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 1741
Joined: 5/28/06
|
Re: Yes, but...
Apr 27, 2012, 2:52 PM
|
|
you missed the sarcasm.
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [2]
TigerPulse: 11%
Posts: 10
Joined: 2/14/12
|
Re: Yes, but...
Apr 27, 2012, 3:02 PM
|
|
Apparently the who all caps thing threw me off
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Just think about the PERMANENT RECORD
Apr 27, 2012, 2:48 PM
[ in reply to Yes, but... ] |
|
Once it goes on there it never comes off.
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [184]
TigerPulse: 33%
Posts: 67
Joined: 4/12/00
|
Spoken with authority…
Apr 27, 2012, 2:50 PM
|
|
Because of previous experience.
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [22965]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 25005
Joined: 6/24/99
|
absolutely no clue why you'd post that...
Apr 27, 2012, 2:54 PM
|
|
the cheatin' chickens were the first school in South Carolina placed on NCAA probation, the last school placed on NCAA probation and have the most NCAA probations of any school in the state!!
The cheatin' chickens are the ones with the "experience"
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [72]
TigerPulse: 27%
Posts: 163
Joined: 1/9/07
|
Re: absolutely no clue why you'd post that...
Apr 27, 2012, 3:00 PM
|
|
> the cheatin' chickens were the first school in South > Carolina placed on NCAA probation, the last school > placed on NCAA probation and have the most NCAA > probations of any school in the state!! > > The cheatin' chickens are the ones with the > "experience"
Before you go throwing those stones in a glass house.
On November 21, 1982, the football program was placed on probation for a 2-year period to include the 1983 and 1984 seasons. This sanction was enforced on the program by the NCAA Committee on Infractions due to a lengthy history of recruiting violations meant to gain an athletic advantage. These recruiting violations took place from 1977 through the Tigers' 1981 National Championship season and into 1982, under the administration of two head coaches, Charlie Pell and Danny Ford. The Atlantic Coast Conference imposed a third year of conference penalty.
Over 150 documented violations were found to have been committed under NCAA bylaws in the categories of improper recruiting inducements, extra benefits to student-athletes, unethical conduct, improper financial aid, improper campus visits, improper transportation and entertainment, improper use of funds, improper employment, improper recruiting contact, and distribution of cash to players by members of the coaching staff.[9]
As a result of these violations, Clemson was barred from participating in bowl games following the 1982 and 1983 seasons, and barred from appearing on live television in the 1983 and 1984 seasons. Also, the number of scholarships that the university could allocate to football players was restricted to 20 (from the normal limit of 30) for the 1983-84 and 1984-85 academic years. The Tigers, however, were allowed to keep their 1978 and 1981 ACC titles as well as the 1981 national title.
Charles Alan Wright, chairman of the NCAA Committee on Infractions said at the time, "Due to the large number and serious nature of the violations in this case, the committee believed that institutional sanctions related to appearances on television and in postseason football bowl games were appropriate. In addition, because the violations indicated a pattern of improper recruiting activities, the committee determined that a two-year limitation on financial aid to new recruits should be imposed to offset any recruiting advantage that was gained improperly by the university."[10][11]
Just five years after their probation ended, Clemson once again found their football program accused of multiple recruiting violations in January 1990.[12] The NCAA accused Clemson of giving cash to players and having illegal contact with recruits over a period from 1984 to 1988. In June 1990, the Tigers found themselves on probation once again, for the second time in less than a decade.[13] This chain of events contributed, in part, to the forced resignation of popular head coach Danny Ford.
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [22965]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 25005
Joined: 6/24/99
|
First off
Apr 27, 2012, 3:04 PM
|
|
stooge, I'm not the one who threw the first "stone"---it was your chickentroll brother above....secondly, nothing I posted is untrue. usuck was placed on NCAA probation in 1965, they've been on probation TWICE now in the last seven years for a total of 6 times on NCAA probation---to Clemson's 5.
You freakin' morons need to take a look at your own probation history.
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [23693]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 36824
Joined: 8/19/03
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [942]
TigerPulse: 59%
Posts: 2479
Joined: 6/2/11
|
Oh well. So much for justice.***
Apr 27, 2012, 2:45 PM
|
|
****
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
I don't know what y'all are talking about.
Apr 27, 2012, 2:47 PM
|
|
I went to a Christian school. In kindergarten, I got slapped on the wrist for running in the hall. That hurt like all get out.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [61827]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 39640
Joined: 12/16/01
|
What a laughable joke!
Apr 27, 2012, 2:48 PM
|
|
Is today April 1?
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [387]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 122
Joined: 7/13/01
|
Re: HERE ARE THE PENALTIES FOR THE COOTS
Apr 27, 2012, 2:52 PM
|
|
Heck, The 18,500 dollar fine was less than the hotel bill!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4774]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 7611
Joined: 12/17/11
|
Re: HERE ARE THE PENALTIES FOR THE COOTS
Apr 27, 2012, 3:04 PM
|
|
Probation from what?
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [27366]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 26233
Joined: 9/19/11
|
Don't overlook the "PUBLIC REPRIMAND." Their program may
Apr 27, 2012, 3:12 PM
|
|
never recover from that.
Especially since their reputation was above reproach.
|
|
|
|
Replies: 16
| visibility 1
|
|
|