Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
search
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!
W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000
YOUR BALANCE
Need some clarification
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 2
| visibility 745

Need some clarification


Sep 10, 2018, 9:48 AM

So on the offsetting penalty call early in the game, they had an ineligibly receiver down field, and we had a pass interference call. I am not seeing how those offset if the initial pass was "illegal" wouldn't that trump the pass interference seeing as how it happened before the pass?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Need some clarification


Sep 10, 2018, 9:54 AM

Your point makes sense, but this is how the rules work. I guess it's to prevent the defense from realizing there's going to be a penalty on the offense, so they commit PI or something which results in an interception. The rule works the same the other way around though. Say the defense is offsides, the offense can still be called for holding or offensive PI which would cause the penalties to offset.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Great question! Would it be the same if the illegal receive


Sep 10, 2018, 10:04 AM

So would it be the same if the illegal receiver were the one the pass interference was called on? Just curious.

2024 student level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 2
| visibility 745
Popular Board Posts
📰 E-Mail News Alerts

TigerBoard POTD

Hill Watch...129 days!!!

by O.J.

Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic