I am getting tired of the “debate” about resume.
There is no such thing as a “good” loss. That is a SEC created piece of BS.
You pick the best 4 teams. If there is a tie. - fine - then resume matters.
I don’t care if Clemson plays poorly ranked teams. It does not matter. The goal is to win the games.
Then, compare the teams. Would Clemson be dogs to anyone? I like my chances against the top several.
Nobody has an offense, defense combination that we have. And, getting better on offense.
I respect Ohio state. Probably have them as best I have watched. LSU - respect - but some of that is built on the theory that Texas was good. Bama - respect offense - defense lacking. Penn state - not ready to put them into the best 4.
Then, again, BS on the “good loss” theory. So, nobody that has lost should be in - unless there are only 3 undefeated teams. (Which is what will happen). Then, and only then, should resume matter.
I would currently take Oregon or OK over a one loss Bama or LSU.
JMO anyway.
Why is it that wins count less than losses? Having top 10 wins on your resume and a loss to a top 10 is not worse than being undefeated against unranked teams IMHO.
|