Replies: 12
| visibility 1
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11171
Joined: 11/30/95
|
Front Page Story: Clemson ranked 7th in initial BCS Standings
Oct 16, 2011, 8:38 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [57]
TigerPulse: 75%
Posts: 141
Joined: 8/8/07
|
Re: Front Page Story: Clemson ranked 7th in initial BCS Standings
Oct 16, 2011, 8:47 PM
|
|
BCS is CRAP....Its not that i disagree where Clemson is in the poll...I just think that any team in the top 10 at the end of the year should be able to play for the National Championship...PLAYOFF is the only way to be fair...what does the computer know about football anyways..the players should control the game, not voters, not the computer..all Clemson needs to focus on is winning...let everything else fall into place ...MESSAGE TO PLAYERS!!! IGNORE THE POLLS!! GO TIGERS!!!
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7191]
TigerPulse: 70%
Posts: 20374
Joined: 8/18/06
|
Re: Front Page Story: Clemson ranked 7th in initial BCS Standings
Oct 16, 2011, 9:10 PM
|
|
Playoff.You want a playoff.Why do you think there is all of this talk,and movement of teams from one conferece to another?The only way to seperate football from the BCS is for the major conferences to expand to 16 teams, divided into two divisions(some want 4 pods),have the winners play for the conference and the 4 conference winners advance to a playoff system not associated with the current BCS bowl affiliations.
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [32]
TigerPulse: 44%
Posts: 95
Joined: 9/29/11
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1724]
TigerPulse: 66%
Posts: 3421
Joined: 2/7/07
|
Sagarin #3. Computers (#5) like us more than the voters (#8)
Oct 16, 2011, 10:15 PM
|
|
Clemson is #7, just as the mock BCS simulations predicted.
I guess we might be sitting at #3 or #4 if FSU & UGA had beaten Oklahoma & Boise St.
It'll all work out as long as Clemson keeps winning. Undefeated Orange Bowl champs would be fine with me.
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14532]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18193
Joined: 12/16/98
|
computers don't have lingering doubts or conference bias
Oct 16, 2011, 10:16 PM
|
|
methinks.
Just keep winnin' baby.
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2/8/11
|
Just remember, #7 doesn't mean anything if we lose to UNC***
Oct 16, 2011, 10:35 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [156]
TigerPulse: 83%
Posts: 558
Joined: 10/18/10
|
SCREWED
Oct 16, 2011, 11:03 PM
|
|
Im worried this cinderella year for us will be over shadowed by Technical (Computer screwing). Took 30 yrs to get back to the promnise land dont let the computer take away our dreams. JUST WIN OUT CLEMSON and let the higher ranking teams eliminate themselves.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3788]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 9880
Joined: 11/2/08
|
you realize
Oct 16, 2011, 11:09 PM
|
|
we're ranked higher by the computers than by the human polls right?
|
|
|
|
|
Team Captain [482]
TigerPulse: 82%
Posts: 923
Joined: 2/24/07
|
The computer is a good thing for Clemson.
Oct 16, 2011, 11:16 PM
[ in reply to SCREWED ] |
|
It doesn't care if you're name is Wisconsin or Boise State. Two teams that Clemson should be ahead of in the BCS rankings.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5330]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10336
Joined: 10/13/02
|
"Just win" is right
Oct 16, 2011, 11:34 PM
[ in reply to SCREWED ] |
|
if we were to go 13-0 (and that's still a biiiig IF) and didn't make the title game...then we'll go prove why we belonged and still have our special season. GO TIGERS!
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [85]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 189
Joined: 9/5/09
|
Re: Front Page Story: Clemson ranked 7th in initial BCS Standings
Oct 17, 2011, 2:12 AM
|
|
Just win 'em all Tigers. Let the chips fall where they may.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4712]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7703
Joined: 9/23/03
|
I'm shocked we're still behind Boise in the Colley system
Oct 17, 2011, 8:38 AM
|
|
1. Oklahoma St 0.949688 6-0 0.599584: 8 2 3 W: #20 Texas 2. Oklahoma 0.934412 6-0 0.579216: 20 1 1 W: #20 Texas 3. Alabama 0.924919 7-0 0.546325: 36 2 3 W: #11 Penn St 4. LSU 0.908568 7-0 0.525302: 56 2 3 W: #16 Oregon 5. Boise St 0.901582 6-0 0.535443: 42 0 2 W: #31 Georgia 6. Clemson 0.878291 7-0 0.486374: 77 1 2 W: #9 Virginia Tech 7. Kansas St 0.876006 6-0 0.501342: 67 0 2 W: #34 Baylor 8. Stanford 0.823144 6-0 0.430859: 112 0 1 W: #50 UCLA 9. Virginia Tech 0.811614 6-1 0.543504: 37 0 1 W: #46 Wake Forest 10. Michigan 0.800094 6-1 0.528693: 52 0 2 W: #32 Notre Dame 11. Penn St 0.798069 6-1 0.526089: 54 0 2 W: #39 Temple 12. Houston 0.793861 6-0 0.391815: 125 0 1 W: #50 UCLA 13. South Carolina 0.792107 6-1 0.518424: 59 0 1 W: #31 Georgia 14. Wisconsin 0.783654 6-0 0.378205: 129 1 1 W: #15 Nebraska 15. Nebraska 0.780209 5-1 0.540278: 40 0 2 W: #27 Washington 16. Oregon 0.776627 5-1 0.535502: 41 0 1 W: #30 Arizona St 17. Arkansas 0.761759 5-1 0.515679: 61 1 2 W: #23 Texas A&M 18. Illinois 0.758045 6-1 0.474630: 86 0 1 W: #30 Arizona St 19. USC 0.754290 5-1 0.505720: 65 0 1 W: #36 Syracuse 20. Texas 0.754245 4-2 0.672327: 1 0 2 W: #37 BYU 21. West Virginia 0.738143 5-1 0.484191: 78 0 0 W: #67 Marshall 22. Rutgers 0.734982 5-1 0.479975: 81 0 1 W: #36 Syracuse 23. Texas A&M 0.734196 4-2 0.645594: 2 0 3 W: #29 SMU 24. Michigan St 0.729789 5-1 0.473052: 88 1 2 W: #10 Michigan 25. Georgia Tech 0.725528 6-1 0.432822: 110 0 1 W: #33 North Carolina
|
|
|
|
Replies: 12
| visibility 1
|
|
|