Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
search
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!
W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000
YOUR BALANCE
FB Update: WATCH: ESPN - ACC wide receivers analysis
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 6
| visibility 1,893

FB Update: WATCH: ESPN - ACC wide receivers analysis


Jun 6, 2014, 11:46 AM

 
WATCH: ESPN - ACC wide receivers analysis

Read Update »
flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Enjoy TigerNet? Upgrade and get your ® today, thanks!


Re: FB Update: WATCH: ESPN - ACC wide receivers analysis


Jun 6, 2014, 12:41 PM

Wow. I really feel sorry for poor, old Clemson. Apparently we have no player who can catch the ball. Alas!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

She didn't even mention our top returning WR... Humphries.***


Jun 6, 2014, 1:08 PM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


That isn't what Adelson said... like at all


Jun 6, 2014, 5:00 PM [ in reply to Re: FB Update: WATCH: ESPN - ACC wide receivers analysis ]

Any objective analyst of this team is going to look at our receivers and say that they're "unproven," because they are. Nobody's been relied upon to be the guy whose name is called to pick up a big first down, and nobody's been a go- to receiver.

Charone Peake started the year out as our number 2 guy last year, but he was only around for 2 games last year and has less than 400 yards receiving in his three years on the team. We all know that his lack of production is more due to the guys who were ahead of him and injury than it is due to lack of talent. But that also means Peake is "unproven."

Humphries is a good receive, but nobody thinks he's the guy that will carry this unit.

Williams showed some signs of being a very good receiver, but he's only played one year in which he had only 20 receptions.

Beyond that, Clemson fans know we have a lot of talent, but none of it has played much, and is thus "unproven."


I'm not sure why anybody would object to people saying that our WR corps, as "unproven" as it is, is a question mark.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: That isn't what Adelson said... like at all


Jun 6, 2014, 5:11 PM

I agree. They are unproven. But by years end we will have several names being talked about. Peake, Williams, Humphries, maybe even Scott or Priester.

We really don't know yet who but a few will be the go to guys.

If Peake is 100% he will be big time.

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: That isn't what Adelson said... like at all


Jun 6, 2014, 6:32 PM

The UGAy LEGHUMPERS won't know who to cover! Everyone is so bad and unproven! Don't forget Trevion Thompson, Germone Hopper, Kyrin Preister, and then there's the tight ends and backs from the backfield to cover

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"... nobody more so than Clemson" is a bit dramatic....


Jun 6, 2014, 6:51 PM [ in reply to That isn't what Adelson said... like at all ]

I'd love to see the WR casts of the other 13 by comparison...

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Replies: 6
| visibility 1,893
📰 E-Mail News Alerts

TigerBoard POTD

Meeting my mother for the first time

by Clemsonohiotiger®

Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic