»
Topic: FB Update: Alabama DB: "Refs were against us"
Replies: 72   Last Post: Jan 26, 2017 9:04 PM by: Dr. Nikola Tesla
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.


[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 72  

FB Update: Alabama DB: "Refs were against us"

[2]
Posted: Jan 11, 2017 11:43 AM
 

Alabama DB: "Refs were against us"

Read Update »



What happened to good sportsmanship?

[3]
Posted: Jan 11, 2017 11:44 AM
 

Just tip your hat and congratulate the other team.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: What happened to good sportsmanship?

[2]
Posted: Jan 11, 2017 11:50 AM
 

Did they not see the refs review almost every catch by a Clemson receiver? Talk about trying to take some momentum out of some of the drives!

Herbstreet talking about his arms was hilarious during the game.


Re: What happened to good sportsmanship?


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 2:31 PM
 

Good grief! You would expect at least a little bit of class from Alabama. What a whiner!

2020 white level member

Nothing wrong with his comments


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 2:38 PM
 

During the course of a game, I seldom agreed with a call that went against me, particularly when it was something like a charge/block call. (basketball and golf were my main sports) I don't see the need to call him out on those comments. He had a half dozen microphones in his face after losing the NCG and he's 21 at most. He didn't make an issue of it. He just said how the calls impacted their attitude. Personally, I think it was the CU players' amazing catches and unwillingness to go away, but I get how thinking it was referee calls feels better.

He deserves some slack.


Re: What happened to good sportsmanship?


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 5:03 PM
 

He is from the SEC which explains alot. If they win, it is because they are better, if they lose it is someone else's fault. Typical SEC arrogance


No time for LOSERS cause we are the CHAMPIONS . . .


Posted: Jan 12, 2017 9:25 AM
 

of the WORLD. Roll Tears Roll!


Funny.....I felt the same way.***

[5]
Posted: Jan 11, 2017 11:44 AM
 



2020 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

What calls??

[2]
Posted: Jan 11, 2017 11:47 AM
 

We got one PI call and MW was literally tackled. They missed like 5 brutal PIs.


Seriously!***


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 1:12 PM
 



2020 student level member

THEY ALSO MISSED . . .

[1]
Posted: Jan 11, 2017 1:27 PM
 

a BUNCH of holds by Bama's Oline, and a few blocks in the back, and two or three targeting calls. So I don't wanna hear it.


I was worried about what that ref could take from me!!

[4]
Posted: Jan 11, 2017 11:47 AM
 

Did you see that dude's pythons???
Wearing a size smedium, lol.

military_donation.jpg

was he asked why an Alabama player

[4]
Posted: Jan 11, 2017 11:49 AM
 

was allowed to throw a punch and not be ejected as the rule states? The officials saw it because they called a personal foul but didn't eject the player.
I thought that was worse than the obvious, text book, targeting plays that Alabama had and they didn't call.


Was at the game and missed this.

[1]
Posted: Jan 11, 2017 12:13 PM
 

someone threw a punch? that must've been the personal foul that we couldn't figure out...

2020 student level member

Second half of Washington game I believe...***


Posted: Jan 12, 2017 8:54 AM
 




Ok Bama, don't go Louisville on us.

[3]
Posted: Jan 11, 2017 11:51 AM
 

Foster should have been ejected from the game in the first quarter.


Re: Ok Bama, don't go Louisville on us.

[4]
Posted: Jan 11, 2017 11:52 AM
 

He needs to look at the game. Their offensive line holds every play.

2020 purple level member


Re: Ok Bama, don't go Louisville on us.


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 12:29 PM
 

Every play, they were allowed to tackle our DE's behind the LOS to save a sack with the ref standing there and watching it. Their O lineman was on our players back when they went down and the ref done nothing and he watched it!!!!

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg


Re: FB Update: Alabama DB: "Refs were against us"

[4]
Posted: Jan 11, 2017 11:53 AM
 

I love the taste of their tears


roll tears roll***

[10]
Posted: Jan 11, 2017 12:00 PM
 



badge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: FB Update: Alabama DB: "Refs were against us"


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 12:31 PM
 

Delicious and very salty!!!

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg


Didn't watch this but it went both ways.

[3]
Posted: Jan 11, 2017 11:55 AM
 

Bo's 1st TD was aided by a huge hold and block in the back that was not called.


I saw that holding, some other holding, and some BLATANT

[1]
Posted: Jan 11, 2017 12:00 PM
 

targeting calls committed by Alabama that didn't get called. Heck, on our winning TD they missed Scott getting tackled by a Bama DB.

Which non-calls did you see Clemson commit?


This^^^^***


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 2:40 PM
 




2 words:

[2]
Posted: Jan 11, 2017 11:55 AM
 
IMG_1659.PNG(100.9 K)

Horse shirt

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: FB Update: Alabama DB: "Refs were against us"

[1]
Posted: Jan 11, 2017 11:58 AM
 

Not to mention the perfect form tackle OJ Howard had on O Daniel that allowed Bo to score.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg

Sure they were....


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 11:58 AM
 

as evidenced by the two targeting fouls and numerous holding penalties committed by Alabama the officials never saw or called.

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg

Sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together.


Is this at all surprising?

[2]
Posted: Jan 11, 2017 11:59 AM
 

This is the typical (not everyone, I'll admit) Bama delusion. We cannot be beaten, so it must be another's fault when we lose. Take your pick:

Refs made us lose.
We didn't want to be there.
Other team must have cheated.
We assumed we were ahead on the scoreboard, but don't get a proper education at our school, so couldn't do the math.
Not fair that the ball isn't perfectly round, so there were some anti-Bama bounces.


What happened to playing your hardest, then admitting the other team was better (even if it's just for 60 minutes)?
This is the result of the everyone gets a trophy culture, where you're not taught at a young age that there's always someone better so you learn to win and lose with class.


I guess when everyone is telling you that you're the


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 12:36 PM
 

greatest defense of all time it kinda goes to your head. We can't be beat because everyone told us we were the best so it must be the refs. Just like their defense didn't get scorched last year, they just didn't play real Alabama football.


Hootie

[1]
Posted: Jan 11, 2017 12:01 PM
 

I guess you didn't see the same game I saw monday night.If anything the refs were against the tigers,at the end of the day big ten refs allowed both sides to bang heads.


The Refs did miss a couple calls...

[2]
Posted: Jan 11, 2017 12:06 PM
 

...but is was not the rub calls they missed....it was the head shots Williams and Watson took.

Bama players should learn the rules of football....

Good article that explains it: http://www.sbnation.com/2017/1/9/14221614/clemson-alabama-pick-play-pass-interference-rub

2020 orange level member2017_nascar_champ.gif2018_nascar_champ.gif2019_nascar_champ.gif

Just to clarify "rubs" happen often at the goalline and are

[1]
Posted: Jan 11, 2017 12:13 PM
 

not illegal. And to further clarify, there was a rub intended on Renfrow's winning TD, but the defender ended up tackling Scott who had full right to make a move to the inside. The tackling action is what ultimately took Renfrow's defender out of the play. They should blame their own DBs for that one, but regardless a rub isn't against the rules.


Re: Just to clarify "rubs" happen often at the goalline and are


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 12:46 PM
 

One of the guest refs said the reason there was no flag, was bc the Bama player initiated the penalty before the ghost excessive rub that was thought to be a penalty by the bama people.

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg


Re: The Refs did miss a couple calls...


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 12:38 PM
 

I love how little ole Hunter sprung back up on his feet when whats his name #2 tried to punish and hurt him!!!

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg


Even Finebaum commented on some Bamians

[3]
Posted: Jan 11, 2017 12:08 PM
 

whining about officiating---he criticized any attempt to place any blame for the loss on the refs and he did state outright that the tiders had gotten away with some plays that could easily have resulted in targeting ejections

The only people even clinging to the hope that referee errors were what cost them the game are stupid Bamà players and fans.....and, of course, the green chickens in columbia


Message was edited by: tigrjm76®


2020 purple level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg


WOW. Classy. Of course Bama can't be beat straight up????***

[1]
Posted: Jan 11, 2017 12:10 PM
 



military_donation.jpg

yes, and we called you names, and moved the 1st down marker, etc

[1]
Posted: Jan 11, 2017 12:11 PM
 

Smh


Re: FB Update: Alabama DB: "Refs were against us"

[1]
Posted: Jan 11, 2017 12:16 PM
 

How about the pass interference call the ref missed where the Bama FB had his arm draped around our receiver and the missed targeting call.


Re: FB Update: Alabama DB: "Refs were against us"


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 12:23 PM
 

Targeting? Missed? How many penalties against both teams total? Weak weak weak, just like the "all world, all killer" defense....


Re: FB Update: Alabama DB: "Refs were against us"

[1]
Posted: Jan 11, 2017 12:23 PM
 

That sounds strange to me bc, I felt like the refs were trying to help Saban and the Bama team keep the NCT at their place!!!

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg


Re: FB Update: Alabama DB: "Refs were against us"


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 4:02 PM
 

Generally I am not a conspiracy theorist, but even I was concerned about "The Fix" being in against Clemson. Vegas stood to lose MILLIONS of dollars if Clemson won. The no calls on the targeting early just confirmed that we would have to beat 'Bama and the officials.

2020 purple level member

Re: FB Update: Alabama DB: "Refs were against us"


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 7:52 PM
 

The refs are always against the losing team right?
His comments are probably being blown out of proportion. He was frustrated.
The 2 no calls on the targeting evens out the complaints as far as i am concerned.


I love it

[1]
Posted: Jan 11, 2017 12:26 PM
 

What other team has beaten Alabama to the point where they're having to make excuses? We took their best shot and still beat them and they can't stand that.


Re: FB Update: Alabama DB: "Refs were against us"


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 12:28 PM
 

I know of no one with the Hootie nickname who is worth a carp

badge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: FB Update: Alabama DB: "Refs were against us"


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 12:29 PM
 

I would like him to explain what calls or no calls he is talking about.


Re: FB Update: Alabama DB: "Refs were against us"


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 12:34 PM
 

d--n; wonder what game he played in? I felt totally the opposite; that the ref's were on Alabama's side and against Clemson!


I told everyone in the stands that

[3]
Posted: Jan 11, 2017 12:38 PM
 
HR.JPG(16.8 K)

The refs missed 3 calls (at least) in the first quarter alone and I told everyone around me in the stands, long before some calls started going our way - 1) the targeting penalty on the Deshaun hit to the head with the arm; 2) the targeting penalty on the Mike W. hit that was unquestionably helmet-to-helmet targeting; and (3) the obvious holding on their first TD (holding on our defender - can't remember who, but occurred on about the 3 yard line. Those were obvious and I was on row N in the upper deck and could see it. In addition, the refs were horrible all night long. For a ref that was 25 yards away from the play to have to call obvious PI when there was ref 2 yards away is awful.

Finally, for all the Alabama people who claim that Tay committed PI on the game-winning "rub", watch it again. That should have been defensive PI. Tay goes straight to the defender, the defender gets his hands completely around Tay and pulls him to the ground!! Look at this picture that I have attached. That is first contact on the play. Clearly defensive PI.

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Technically, this is defensive holding...


Posted: Jan 12, 2017 9:07 AM
 

until the ball is in the air.

It was clear to me that bama was intentionally doing PI just to get the game to overtime. The time still comes off the clock on a PI or holding call, so we would have been forced to kick a field goal.

Not a bad strategy, but the call by Scott was even better! Bama's interference took their other DB out of the play! Easy 6!


Re: FB Update: Alabama DB: "Refs were against us"


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 12:40 PM
 

I called more penalties than the refs did! DW4 took a blow to the head more than once, MW7 as well ... I thought maybe since Watson had hung with Cam Newton some that he was getting the Cam Newton treatment.


Two Obvious Targeting Calls Missed! Ya...They Were Against Y'all ----


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 12:40 PM
 

I thought weed killed the brain cells. Apparently smoking that elephant dung is doing something a little more severe.


The most controversial calls in the game were the 2 hits


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 12:44 PM
 

by Bama early in the game that couldve/shouldve been targeting.

2020 white level member

Re: The most controversial calls in the game were the 2 hits


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 1:03 PM
 

With ACC or SEC refs, two Bama players NCG would have been over in the 1st Quarter!!!

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg


Re: FB Update: Alabama DB: "Refs were against us"


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 12:59 PM
 

Excuses are for losers.


Re: FB Update: Alabama DB: "Refs were against us"


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 1:06 PM
 

And just like the coots, Bama, the best the SEC had to offer were also the losers by the hands of Clemson. But Bama did put up a better fight!!!!

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg


Re: FB Update: Alabama DB: "Refs were against us"

[1]
Posted: Jan 11, 2017 1:15 PM
 

At least we scored more points then Ohio St. :-/


If he's talking about the 'picks,' ...

[2]
Posted: Jan 11, 2017 1:15 PM
 

it's like the old folks say, 'Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice shame on me.' Why in the world did they play our WR's so close after getting fooled once? Morons. Oh, and the second pick was a definite flag on them for tackling Scott on the other side of the LOS. Smooth move, Exlax. SOS said that play was legal and he knows more about football than any of those who are openly complaining.

I also thought Dabo vindicate himself for not understand that onside kick from the previous year was a legal play and not teaching the formation to stop it. Nothing says screw you like doing the same thing to them to end the game at the next meeting. Payback is a bich.

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

Alabama's fans have been ripping this guy a new arsehole for


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 1:38 PM
 

this. A lot of them didn't even know who he was. I'm sure you won't see Reuben Foster complaining. That dirty [email protected] should have been thrown out on several plays and I'm sure he knows it.

2020 student level member

Who the HeII is Hootie? Did he EVEN play? How the HeII would


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 2:23 PM
 

he even know?


Poor babies. The refs didn't give them any medals


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 2:34 PM
 

for trying to take our three best offensive players out of the game in the first quarter with illegal spearing.


RTR.....


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 2:37 PM
 

Now stands for ROLL TEARS ROLL!!!!!

??????


Sadan should keep them buttoned up....


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 2:43 PM
 

Stupid might fall out.


Re: FB Update: Alabama DB: "Refs were against us"


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 4:06 PM
 

I all can say to that is wow. We really got very breaks in that game. Just admit the better team beat you and move on.


Re: FB Update: Alabama DB: "Refs were against us"


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 4:38 PM
 

My overall impression of AL defensive play was to wonder if they had been trained and told to hit with the top of their helmets, while launching?!

2020 orange level membermilitary_donation.jpg

Send that whiner a case of Prep H...***


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 4:50 PM
 

null


Message was edited by: SOLOS®


2020 purple level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

the db is a little bit of a bad sport but I watched


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 9:28 PM
 

The other lockeroom interviews and they come off as pretty classy. There is also RESPECT for the team that just won the game, and that was earned by Clemson and is impressive


Re: the db is a little bit of a bad sport but I watched


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 9:31 PM
 

Yes that's true, but I've says it once I'll say it again. Hey Hootie, ####!

2020 white level member

If the refs had not been so bad Bama would have had 2 defend


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 9:59 PM
 

defenders ejected in the first quarter and Clemson would have won by 21.

Bama was clearly trying to hurt our stars Watson and Williams to start the game. Bama didn't have many big plays but most of them were due to uncalled penalties. Bama was lucky these refs sucked as bad as they did. The Fiesta bowl refs were great but these guys sucked.


Shouldn't he be playing a free concert in Cootsville


Posted: Jan 11, 2017 11:15 PM
 

Pull yourself together, man. Show some dignity.
One last thing, Hootie - read this:
http://www.al.com/alabamafootball/index.ssf/2017/01/pick_plays_rules_experts_weigh.html

Cricket Chirp Temperature Formula:
Number of Chirps per 14 seconds + 40 = Approximate Temperature


THE BITTER BITTER TASTE OF SOUR GRAPES


Posted: Jan 12, 2017 10:05 AM
 

N/M

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

"Refs were against us!!!!!!"


Posted: Jan 12, 2017 10:14 AM
 

Suppose that statement comes from the influence of the Cooties riding their coattails????


Dude needs a drug test. Was he the guy pulling on Williams'


Posted: Jan 12, 2017 6:27 PM
 

jersey as he went up for the great catch? With no PI call.

military_donation.jpg

yaaaawn***


Posted: Jan 12, 2017 6:30 PM
 




How freak you gotta get to scam white


Posted: Jan 26, 2017 9:04 PM
 

pussiboi...

Looks like thousands of tats and dreads on u from the Tide Funding association....

-Doc

2005_ncaa_champ.jpg

I've been wrong two times, but this isn't one of them.


Replies: 72  

TIGER TICKETS

FB GAME: Season Tickets
FOR SALE: 4 tickets in lower deck Sec UO asking 1400 each, email if interested.

Buy or Sell CU Tickets and More in Tiger Tickets!

[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
9007 people have read this post