Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Right Wing Site Attacks Obama On Terrorists And Police State
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 6
| visibility 317

Right Wing Site Attacks Obama On Terrorists And Police State


May 2, 2013, 2:06 PM

It is difficult to capture in words the scale of Obama’s hypocrisy and cynicism. In one breath he hailed an unprecedented police-state operation involving thousands of troops and heavily armed police, as well as armored vehicles and military helicopters, carried out to enforce a “shelter in place” order and conduct warrantless house-to-house searches of entire neighborhoods—all in search of one 19-year-old youth—and in the next he claimed to be upholding “due process.”

Not only did this de facto state of siege violate virtually every civil liberty inscribed in the Bill of Rights, but Obama’s Justice Department decided not to read Dzhokhar Tsarnaev his Miranda rights to remain silent and have a lawyer present at any interrogation. The Los Angeles Times reported that the interagency High Value Detainee Interrogation Group ignored repeated requests for legal counsel from the severely wounded suspect during 16 hours of questioning.

Obama’s attempt to portray the alleged Boston bombers as lone-wolf terrorists who operated without any external help or foreign ties is consistent with the official line given out by the White House since the killing of Tamerlan and capture of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev. It appears that this claim is motivated by a desire to divert attention from the connections of the suspects with US intelligence agencies.

In addition to the multiple warnings cited above and evidence of direct contact between Tamerlan Tsarnaev and reputed terrorists in Dagestan, other facts belie the official story that the elder brother dropped below the radar of the FBI, CIA and Homeland Security Department due to a “failure to communicate” on the part of the agencies.

After his return to Boston from Russia last year, Tsarnaev, according to the Washington Post, “assembled an extensive playlist of jihadist videos online.” And he was ejected from his mosque in the Boston area after making inflammatory anti-American statements. As one media source recently noted, since 9/11 the FBI has maintained a program of surveillance and the use of informants in mosques across the US.

In every major terror event in the US for more than a decade, it has emerged that the alleged perpetrators were well known to US police and intelligence agencies, which had been given multiple advance warnings of their activities. The explanation given in each case was that the authorities simply “failed to connect the dots” or “failed to communicate.”

Such was the case in the attacks of September 11, 2001. Such also was the case in the failed attempt by Nigerian Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab on Christmas Day 2009 to ignite a plastic explosive device as a Northwest flight made its final descent toward Detroit. In that case, the father of the perpetrator had visited the US embassy in Nigeria one month earlier to warn authorities about the terrorist connections of his son in Yemen, and American authorities had received warnings of plans by Yemen-based Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula to attack the United States.

So too in the Boston Marathon bombings. If this were merely yet another staggering security failure on the part of US police and intelligence agencies, why have those officials responsible not been named and removed from their posts? Why is Robert Mueller, the head of the FBI at the time of the 9/11 attacks, still running the agency?

Claims of mere incompetence or “lapses” are not credible. The most elementary precautions, according to the official story, were somehow not taken. It is claimed, for example, that the FBI never informed the Boston police of its dossier on Tamerlan Tsarnaev. Given the fact that the city was holding a mass public event—the marathon—there is no innocent explanation for such a “mistake.” One would assume that in the run-up to such an event, the authorities would be tracking every move of such an individual.

Well, maybe it is not a Right Wing Site after all. Sorry about that. I know libbies will be disappointed that their friends have critized Obama.

The Boston tragedy is but the latest example of US imperialism’s intrigues and crimes around the world becoming the breeding grounds for attacks on innocent people at home.

http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/05/02/bomb-m02.html

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg2013_nascar_champ.gif2014_nascar_champ.gif flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Without even reading, I'm just shocked by the headline...


May 2, 2013, 2:08 PM

:/

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Does this mean you no longer believe Obama is a socialist?***


May 2, 2013, 2:10 PM



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Does this mean you no longer believe Obama is a socialist?***


May 2, 2013, 3:15 PM

Short answer, no.

I knew that was coming. So, since Sen. Bernie Sanders, calls himself and identifies himself as a socialist, and supports Obama and caucuses with and votes the democratic party line, the long answer is NO! And, there can always be a little squabling among spouses who love each other. But, eventually, they kiss and make up.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg2013_nascar_champ.gif2014_nascar_champ.gif flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


If Socialists support you, you are a Socialist. If nazis


May 2, 2013, 4:22 PM

support you, you are a nazi. If dumb rednecks support you, you are a dumb redneck. If gheys support you, you are ghey. If terrorists support you, you are a terrorist.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-jospehg.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: If Socialists support me, I are a Socialist. If nazis


May 2, 2013, 5:44 PM

Glad you as a so called "moderate" finally identified your core beliefs. But, since you fail to see the irony that I point out with much of what goes on with liberals, I suspect that you are a hard core closet liberal. Maybe you need a coming out party. And your phobia with "redneck" shows that you are either an effete elitist who was bullied by the kids in Edgefield and were never accepted as you were growing up and have never gotten over it, or you are just trying to fit in with your liberal peer group.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg2013_nascar_champ.gif2014_nascar_champ.gif flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Hey, get off BHO's back.....the Marathon Bombing


May 2, 2013, 2:23 PM

happened a log time ago......

;)

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 6
| visibility 317
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic