Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Do we have too many Weapons on Offense?
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 1
| visibility 677

Do we have too many Weapons on Offense?


Oct 30, 2016, 11:43 AM

With so many weapons on the outside and with Gallman, do we have too many options to keep everyone in rhythm? I just wonder if we are trying to design too many plays to get everyone involved which hurts everyones timing with Watson. I think this may be why Watson has struggled at times this year is because he has six different receivers he is just to throw to so often. None of them are the same size and speed and no one runs the same exact routes.

My opinion but I believe we are so much better in the clutch then when we are running the regular O is because we condense the playbook and who we are looking to get involved. We focus on two or three key players and feed them and Watson gets in rhythm and he looks like he did last year.

With that said I think they will realize this come playoff time and we will see a much improved offense over the course of the game. We will limit who plays and we will limit the playbook since we will not have to worry about tendencies and developing player anymore.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

No


Oct 30, 2016, 12:12 PM

We didn't go to them enough in the first half.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 1
| visibility 677
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic