Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
IMO CW42 is a better DE than a healthy A. Bryant
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 2
| visibility 1

IMO CW42 is a better DE than a healthy A. Bryant


Sep 16, 2016, 9:24 AM

BV's gonna have to make some tough decisions when Bryant comes back healthy. Christian has basically been a full time DE so far this season. I would think that BV will try and find a way to have his best D-Linemen on the field as much as possible (which have been Watkins, Big Dex, and Wilkins).

You'll likely see Christian go from being a 100% DE to 50% DE/ 50% DT when Austin returns. Ferrell and Yeargin's snaps likely take the hit (it won't be Big Dex's) and Bryant probably flip flops throughout the game at SDE and WDE to ensure Big Dex, Watkins, and Christian are in the game together as much as possible.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Disagree


Sep 16, 2016, 9:46 AM

Wilkens does not do a real good job of setting that edge on a run play. He's a serviceable DE but he's a phenomenal DT. He has a better power rush than speed rush. He's also athletic enough to hide coverage that allows him to either mush-rush or drop into that LB zone in pass coverage.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: IMO CW42 is a better DE than a healthy A. Bryant


Sep 16, 2016, 9:50 AM

All I know is that a healthy Bryant and Wilkins is good for Clemson. Figure we have a chance to keep the DL fresh.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 2
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic