|
Replies: 11
| visibility 1
|
All-TigerNet [11469]
TigerPulse: 85%
Posts: 13624
Joined: 10/27/04
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [11469]
TigerPulse: 85%
Posts: 13624
Joined: 10/27/04
|
Re: Check out this bracket % indicator
Mar 17, 2019, 1:52 PM
|
|
In other words, we have about a 75% of making it...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4095]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 5216
Joined: 10/23/10
|
And based on how long I’ve been playing Powerball ...
Mar 17, 2019, 1:53 PM
|
|
I should have won it 10 years ago.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4423]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3407
Joined: 10/15/03
|
looks great to me! Let’s play ball!***
Mar 17, 2019, 1:55 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12942]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6228
Joined: 1/26/16
|
there are a few out there that seem to take into account
Mar 17, 2019, 2:06 PM
|
|
our metrics, and have us at a 10 or 11... even avoiding the play--in
To be honest, I am still shocked that we are not on more people's list. That simply does not make sense. We may not make it, but we have a better resume than 90% of the "bubble" teams... and may have the best one if you break down the Q1 games.
Again, we may not get in... but I don't understand why we are not getting more "talk" about being there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12942]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6228
Joined: 1/26/16
|
If I'm looking at that right, they only missed on 2 last
Mar 17, 2019, 2:09 PM
|
|
year... and i can't determine 2017, but they may not have missed any.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11469]
TigerPulse: 85%
Posts: 13624
Joined: 10/27/04
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12942]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6228
Joined: 1/26/16
|
haha... it shouldn't take much common sense to figure out
Mar 17, 2019, 2:18 PM
|
|
that losses to #1, 4, 6, and 9 should not be seen as worse than a team that won @ #68, 71, and 75.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [44027]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 32945
Joined: 2/22/03
|
Exactly. Brownell made this point yesterday in the interview
Mar 17, 2019, 2:26 PM
|
|
with Katz. It's a very valid point, and is hopefully the kind of analysis the committee uses rather than the generalizations used by Lunardi et al.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12942]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6228
Joined: 1/26/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [44027]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 32945
Joined: 2/22/03
|
I would much prefer to be a 10 or 11 seed.
Mar 17, 2019, 3:08 PM
|
|
As opposed to a 9. I don't want to play a #1 seed in the second round.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [17772]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16661
Joined: 9/1/12
|
That scattergram reminds me I need to learn Tableau for my job
Mar 17, 2019, 4:02 PM
|
|
Why does this matter to any of you?
It doesn't. Just like most of the fire Brownell posts don't matter to me.
But I do hope we make the big dance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 11
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
