|
Replies: 15
| visibility 1,566
|
110%er [6320]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5112
Joined: 7/19/13
|
Can't fix st00pid
Aug 25, 2013, 12:03 PM
|
|
You can just neuter it before it reproduces...
|
|
|
|
 |
Rookie [17]
TigerPulse: 20%
Posts: 46
Joined: 8/12/13
|
Geesh....
Aug 25, 2013, 12:10 PM
|
|
Isn't that roughly 75-80% of the 41-points per game against ACC teams. There is a differnce and more impressive on Georgia's part playing tougher teams.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6320]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5112
Joined: 7/19/13
|
By tougher, do you mean LSU
Aug 25, 2013, 12:13 PM
|
|
I think we did win that one, right? Keep in mind we GAVE away 14 points to them, which would had put us right where our average is.
Like I said, you cannot fix stupid. You can argue the facts of the game, but it does not change it from being fact.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [17298]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7064
Joined: 12/14/98
|
^^^ Proves subject of this thread is highly accurate! ^^^
Aug 25, 2013, 12:13 PM
[ in reply to Geesh.... ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6320]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5112
Joined: 7/19/13
|
Re: Geesh....
Aug 25, 2013, 12:21 PM
[ in reply to Geesh.... ] |
|
By the way, I am sure there is a cheeseburger somewhere just waiting to be eaten. Get your greasy fingers away from the keyboard and go find it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4896]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5278
Joined: 8/24/11
|
You mean waiting to be served.
Aug 25, 2013, 12:28 PM
|
|
nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [9174]
TigerPulse: 69%
Posts: 14648
Joined: 2/5/02
|
Smart move, Tee
Aug 25, 2013, 12:41 PM
[ in reply to Geesh.... ] |
|
Walk away from this one. LKN lit yoassup.
-Doc
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [60207]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42551
Joined: 11/30/98
|
please list the tough teams UGA played last year
Aug 25, 2013, 12:56 PM
[ in reply to Geesh.... ] |
|
I see:
SCAR (lost)...... Clemson played them (L)
Bama (lost)...... Clemson played LSU (W)
Florida (won).... Clemson played FSU (L)
Auburn?.....Clemson played them too
GT? played them also
Nebraska (maybe) - they didn't have a defense; Wisc scored 70 on them
that's pretty much it. Unless you play the Vandy or Ole Miss card (LOL)
We played very comparable schedules.
Date Opponent W-L Score Attendance
Sept. 1 BUFFALO (SECN) W 45-23
Sept. 8 *at Missouri (ESPN2) W 41-20
Sept. 15 FLA. ATLANTIC (CSS) W 56-20
Sept. 22 *VANDERBILT (ESPN2) W 48-3
Sept. 28 *TENNESSEE (CBS) W 51-44
Oct. 6 *at South Carolina (ESPN) L 7-35
Oct. 20 *at Kentucky (FSN) W 29-24
Oct. 27 *Florida (CBS) W 17-9
Nov. 3 *OLE MISS W 37-10
Nov. 10 *at Auburn W 38-0
Nov. 17 GA SOUTHERN (WSB TV) W 45-14
Nov. 24 GEORGIA TECH (ESPN) W 42-10
Dec. 1 #Alabama L 28-32
Jan. 1, ’13 ##Nebraska W 45-31
*SEC Game # SEC Championship Game ##Capital One Bowl
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [40925]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42941
Joined: 11/30/98
|
st00pid would be thinking that a few points a game
Aug 25, 2013, 12:57 PM
|
|
difference from last year has anything at all to do with this year
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6320]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5112
Joined: 7/19/13
|
In the preseason
Aug 25, 2013, 1:04 PM
|
|
pretty much ALL predictions are based on what happened last year. Every magazine, every website, every bookie and better bases first game predictions on last year results barring major program change.
So, I do believe, you are barking up the wrong tree.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [67792]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 115448
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: In the preseason- you are right but even teams loaded w
Aug 25, 2013, 1:14 PM
|
|
returning talent have chemistry and motivation hurdles to overcome. sometimes the loaded team comes back better or sometimes the fall flat. opening games are noticeably unpredictable. two supposedly evenly matched teams based on last year have new guys in certain areas that make the outcome hard to call. should be an interesting and hard fought game but w openers who can say till we get there
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6320]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5112
Joined: 7/19/13
|
Re: In the preseason- you are right but even teams loaded w
Aug 25, 2013, 1:24 PM
|
|
I agree, you cannot. But if we are making argument based on one set of data like the nut sniffers in a previous thread were, I can only point out that the argument is flawed with data that actually does impact the outcome of games.
This thread was not a, "we will win because of these numbers" thread, it was to point out the fact that they were using a stat that has less impact on the outcome of a game as a determination of a superior offense. I merely illustrated to them that the one stat that determines outcome, points, secondary to plays, they fell behind us.
If there is any logical way to argue a point before the season, then data from last year is the most reliable; otherwise, it is just mere opinion. If not for those types of discussions on a sports board, preseason discussions would only be composed of uniform choice and what everyone is wearing to the first game. And really, do we want that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [67792]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 115448
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: In the preseason- you are right but even teams loaded w
Aug 25, 2013, 1:42 PM
|
|
simply pointing out each team is new and openers are an adventure even among teams with many returners.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6320]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5112
Joined: 7/19/13
|
Re: In the preseason- you are right but even teams loaded w
Aug 25, 2013, 1:45 PM
|
|
Acknowledged. I am simply pointing out that if not using some sort of logic, then you are simply talking out of your ###...
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [67792]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 115448
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: In the preseason- you are right but even teams loaded w
Aug 25, 2013, 1:55 PM
|
|
and I'm only saying this time of year even the best logic doesn't necessarily take you very far.
I'll bet Dabo and Richt each think they know how their team will play. I bet neither in spite of their best efforts will be right. Maybe better or worse.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6320]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5112
Joined: 7/19/13
|
Re: In the preseason- you are right but even teams loaded w
Aug 25, 2013, 2:03 PM
|
|
Dude, I agree 100%. All I am saying is, IF you are going to making a rationale argument one way or the other, you have to base it on something. The only objectionable way to do so, is relying on past production from pretty much the same group of guys. I have never seen a team ranked #1 preseason that did not do well the year before. Why is a certain team ranked #1 preseason? Because of the production of said team the previous year. It is a rationale thought process, one that is flawed, but it is still the most rationale one that exists.
However, I concede to you that you never really know until you do it on the field. But, having said that, what else is there to really talk about less than a week out of the first game?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 15
| visibility 1,566
|
|
|
50
