|
Replies: 24
| visibility 1
|
Orange Blooded [2634]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3383
Joined: 8/1/02
|
CLEMSON FB_2015 Prediction as of 1-8-15_Greene
Jan 8, 2015, 4:52 PM
|
|
Gm Tm % Chc. Pred.
1 WOF 100.0% W
2 APST 100.0% W
3 FSU 50.0% L
4 @ MIA 65.0% L
5 ND 60.0% W
6 BC 65.0% W
7 @NCST 75.0% W
8 @SYR 80.0% W
9 WAKE 90.0% W
10 GT 50.0% W
11 @LOU 60.0% L
12 @SCAR 65.0% W
Avg. 71.7% 9-3
Average winning % chance: 71.7% (8.6 wins)
Prediction 9-3 (losses to FSU at home and MIA, LOU on road)
Chance of going undefeated: 1.3%
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [14460]
TigerPulse: 80%
Posts: 22887
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: CLEMSON FB_2015 Prediction as of 1-8-15_Greene
Jan 8, 2015, 4:53 PM
|
|
wow, just wow
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4947]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6981
Joined: 10/12/06
|
Re: CLEMSON FB_2015 Prediction as of 1-8-15_Greene
Jan 8, 2015, 4:53 PM
|
|
And to think I was the only one that ranked @Miami as one of our most difficult games.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
Here are mine
Jan 8, 2015, 4:56 PM
|
|
Gm Tm % Chc. Pred.
1 WOF 100.0% W
2 APST 100.0% W
3 FSU 100.0% W
4 @ MIA 100.0% W
5 ND 100.0% W
6 BC 100.0% W
7 @NCST 100.0% W
8 @SYR 100.0% W
9 WAKE 100.0% W
10 GT 100.0% W
11 @LOU 100.0% W
12 @SCAR 100.0% W
Avg. 100.0% 12-0
Average winning % chance: 100.0% (12.0 wins)
Prediction 12-0 (losses to nobody)
Chance of going undefeated: 100.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [36450]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18324
Joined: 12/6/13
|
I like how this girl thinks.***
Jan 8, 2015, 5:40 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2557]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3678
Joined: 2/18/09
|
LOL! +1 HAWT!***
Jan 8, 2015, 5:45 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4646]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2243
Joined: 11/19/12
|
I don't see much of a drop off next year, with the exception
Jan 9, 2015, 12:30 AM
[ in reply to Here are mine ] |
|
D-Line. However, I think the DL will be really good by the second half of the season. DeShawn Williams said all of the pieces are there for a potential playoff run next season and I'll take his word for it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8681]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8888
Joined: 10/19/11
|
We'll be fine with our starters at Dline
Jan 9, 2015, 12:33 AM
|
|
but what made our DL so good this year was the fact we could rotate 1s and 2s and see virtually no drop off. I'm more concerned about depth as far as Dline goes, but our secondary should be improved and Linebackers will be just as good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [93650]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 95409
Joined: 12/25/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1512]
TigerPulse: 69%
Posts: 3475
Joined: 7/4/13
|
Re: CLEMSON FB_2015 Prediction as of 1-8-15_Greene
Jan 8, 2015, 5:00 PM
|
|
greene: All I can say is your parents wasted a lot of money on your education at Clemson! I've never read anything that was farther off than your predictions. honestly, tell us you're kidding? If you are not, please consider a trip to the doctor to get a brain wave check or if not that try drinking some bourbon before writing your next set of predictions. They'll probably make more sense.
I see where you're in engineering. I hope to he....you're better at it than at knowing anything about football
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [40925]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42941
Joined: 11/30/98
|
his predictions looked good to me
Jan 8, 2015, 6:29 PM
|
|
We obviously lose a bit on defense. Hopefully gain a bit on offense. We went 9-3 this year, so 9-3 is a good prediction for next year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13605]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12896
Joined: 8/10/13
|
Re: his predictions looked good to me
Jan 8, 2015, 6:31 PM
|
|
I believe 9-3 sounds about right as well.
But, have to wonder why he has 50% for both GT and FSU games but has one listed as Loss and the other as a win.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1127]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 2041
Joined: 1/13/14
|
Re: his predictions looked good to me
Jan 9, 2015, 7:31 AM
[ in reply to his predictions looked good to me ] |
|
You think 9-3 is a good prediction when we have the nation's best QB? BV subs more than most DC's and it gave this year's D experience. How do we lose to FSU at home when they replace almost everyone on offense with the exception of a couple of freshmen. 1 of those did really well until he vomited all over himself in the playoff. The others are just pretty good. We are also bringing in our best recruiting class. I think that 11-1 is a good prediction unless DW gets hurt or we field a worse OL than last year. Then you are looking at 8-4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64573]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88987
Joined: 3/27/01
|
Clemson is more likely to....
Jan 8, 2015, 5:02 PM
|
|
lose to Notre Dame or Georgia Tech at home than Miami on the road.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5912]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8567
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Is this based on what
Jan 8, 2015, 5:21 PM
|
|
Clemson lost and no understanding of what other teams lost?
Please go look at what the other teams lost - like Miami, FSU and BC to start with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13605]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12896
Joined: 8/10/13
|
Re: CLEMSON FB_2015 Prediction as of 1-8-15_Greene
Jan 8, 2015, 6:15 PM
|
|
> Gm Tm % Chc. Pred.
> 1 WOF 100.0% W
> 2 APST 100.0% W
> 3 FSU 50.0% L
> 4 @ MIA 65.0% L
> 5 ND 60.0% W
> 6 BC 65.0% W
> 7 @NCST 75.0% W
> 8 @SYR 80.0% W
> 9 WAKE 90.0% W
> 10 GT 50.0% W
> 11 @LOU 60.0% L
> 12 @SCAR 65.0% W
> Avg. 71.7% 9-3
>
> Average winning % chance: 71.7% (8.6 wins)
> Prediction 9-3 (losses to FSU at home and MIA, LOU on
> road)
> Chance of going undefeated: 1.3%
Help me understand. You have both FSU and GT at 50% but fsu as an L and GT as a W. How?
Miami and Bc at 65% but L Miami and W for Bc. Again, how?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [40925]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42941
Joined: 11/30/98
|
If you play 3 teams with an 80% chance each of winning
Jan 8, 2015, 6:35 PM
|
|
you have about a 50/50 chance of losing one of the 3 games. So which one do you pick to lose? You just guess, but chances are almost dead even that you will lose a game that you are favored by 80%
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13605]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12896
Joined: 8/10/13
|
Re: If you play 3 teams with an 80% chance each of winning
Jan 8, 2015, 6:42 PM
|
|
I'm talking about each individual game. Not all the games as a whole.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1127]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 2041
Joined: 1/13/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7169]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4003
Joined: 9/17/14
|
That's just a mess.
Jan 8, 2015, 6:23 PM
|
|
Maybe you could do some early spring cleaning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5082]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5133
Joined: 11/9/09
|
what da hail u tinking boy
Jan 8, 2015, 7:01 PM
|
|
jeez...pound 4 dude - we ain't loosing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [167]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 210
Joined: 12/7/09
|
Re: CLEMSON FB_2015 Prediction as of 1-8-15_Greene
Jan 8, 2015, 7:09 PM
|
|
Uhh...FSU loses 9 on offense, Louisville loses 8 on offense. Miami loses 6 on a bad defense. You better retake statistics and probabilities because you're way off. I'm more concerned with ND and Ga Tech more than them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11435]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 14500
Joined: 1/2/11
|
Miami a loss? lol you're out your mind
Jan 8, 2015, 7:12 PM
|
|
also FSU is losing everyone and you pick them to come in here and beat us? I smell something
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11435]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 14500
Joined: 1/2/11
|
Notice he posted and then disappeared, proof of a troll***
Jan 8, 2015, 7:16 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1127]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 2041
Joined: 1/13/14
|
Re: CLEMSON FB_2015 Prediction as of 1-8-15_Greene
Jan 9, 2015, 7:27 AM
|
|
Miami is 1-2 in their last three home games and has lost their last two games and we are 2-1 in our last three games there. 2 OB and 1 @ Miami. We roll them dude.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 24
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
