|
Replies: 43
| visibility 1
|
All-In [46816]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 30720
Joined: 8/11/15
|
Best Clemson QB-WR combo?
Feb 6, 2017, 11:12 AM
|
|
1. DW-Renfrow
2. Tajh-Sammy
3. Clipboard Jesus-Youngblood
???
|
|
|
|
 |
Standout [323]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 390
Joined: 12/17/12
|
Re: Best Clemson QB-WR combo?
Feb 6, 2017, 11:14 AM
|
|
I say tajh to sammy
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [17786]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13387
Joined: 9/16/03
|
Tajh to Sammy was unstoppable if time to throw/get open w/2nd
Feb 6, 2017, 11:15 AM
|
|
place going to Tajh to Nuk
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18663]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14866
Joined: 12/11/04
|
Unless the opposing D got pressure on Boyd. DW4 was better.***
Feb 6, 2017, 11:28 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [15216]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 18247
Joined: 6/10/09
|
Re: Best Clemson QB-WR combo?
Feb 6, 2017, 11:16 AM
|
|
DW to MW
TB to SW
TB to NH
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [22711]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5884
Joined: 3/28/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3839]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5055
Joined: 9/10/01
|
Re: Steve Fuller to Jerry Butler AGREED!***
Feb 6, 2017, 11:39 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [28373]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14051
Joined: 6/27/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [46816]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 30720
Joined: 8/11/15
|
The only reason Tajh is on the list
Feb 6, 2017, 11:35 AM
|
|
is because of receivers like SW and NH who bailed him out of poorly thrown balls.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [605]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 471
Joined: 1/20/13
|
I think Woody to Gardner at least deserves an honorable mention***
Feb 6, 2017, 11:38 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [17283]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14228
Joined: 12/14/98
|
Woody to Rod .... For at least one play!***
Feb 6, 2017, 12:33 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7159]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10136
Joined: 6/27/07
|
I think Tajh and NUk had or even chemistry
Feb 6, 2017, 12:38 PM
|
|
Sammy used to show up Tajh when he did make a poor throw.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4854]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9113
Joined: 1/15/08
|
Re: I think Tajh and NUk had or even chemistry
Feb 7, 2017, 3:35 AM
|
|
Agreed.
Signed, 4th and 16
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7159]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10136
Joined: 6/27/07
|
Streeter to brian wofford***
Feb 6, 2017, 12:47 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2557]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3678
Joined: 2/18/09
|
DW4 to MW7 seemed to work pretty
Feb 6, 2017, 12:48 PM
|
|
well most of the time. Bama certainly couldn't stop it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4659]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6063
Joined: 10/20/15
|
Re: Best Clemson QB-WR combo?
Feb 6, 2017, 12:53 PM
|
|
Since Artavis Scott just surpassed the clemson reception record, one could argue DW4 - AS, no?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3976]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4990
Joined: 8/9/12
|
Re: Best Clemson QB-WR combo?
Feb 6, 2017, 2:48 PM
|
|
Well it could be a HM, but 80% of his receptions were screens or Jet sweeps that counts as a catch. Again taking nothing away from Scott, he was big time for us, but that's how it was for the most part.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4659]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6063
Joined: 10/20/15
|
Re: Best Clemson QB-WR combo?
Feb 6, 2017, 5:17 PM
|
|
I hear what you're saying but he still has 900+ years as both a freshman and sophmore. Mike only had 316 as a freshman. And when you look at totals, Scott finished with 2480 yards over 3 years, Williams finished with 2727 yards over 2 years. The only reason scott didn't get as many touches this year, truthfully, was because of Williams' return. If we are talking straight clutch - Artavis Scott has to be in the conversation. He averaged roughly 82 receptions per year over 3 years whereas Mike averaged 59 per year. I think I'd take clutch & consisten over a big playmaker myself. Both great but Artavis deserves to be mention, that's all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1322]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 2115
Joined: 12/25/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1627]
TigerPulse: 66%
Posts: 2079
Joined: 12/29/15
|
Re: Best Clemson QB-WR combo?
Feb 6, 2017, 1:11 PM
|
|
Replace Renfrow with Williams
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [46816]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 30720
Joined: 8/11/15
|
Stat wise MW
Feb 6, 2017, 1:12 PM
|
|
but when it was a "gotta have a catch" moment we all knew who it was going to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1627]
TigerPulse: 66%
Posts: 2079
Joined: 12/29/15
|
Re: Stat wise MW
Feb 6, 2017, 1:18 PM
|
|
It was going to Williams.
Go back and look at the final drive, we threw it up to MW twice, both were unsuccessful due to the double team. Play caller realizes Alabama is keying on MW so they call the "crush" play. Perfect execution led to a perfect ending.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [39020]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 51623
Joined: 11/20/04
|
Only two passes to MW on the final drive.
Feb 6, 2017, 2:12 PM
|
|
One was down the sideline early in the drive when he was one-on-one and was successful. The other drew a PI in double coverage.
The first and goal pass was to Leggett.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [50635]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43019
Joined: 12/3/98
|
yea but other than that
Feb 6, 2017, 11:28 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [745]
TigerPulse: 86%
Posts: 948
Joined: 10/31/13
|
Legget barely caught that on the 10!!!
Feb 7, 2017, 1:30 AM
[ in reply to Only two passes to MW on the final drive. ] |
|
Play of the game !!
Even In super slo-motion, it looks like that ball is about to rip is fingers off .....he had to whip his body 180 degrees and fully extend at the very last second !! It was only 2nd down though .... yea!? with :14 on the clock and the game on the line !!!
Gets me every time
!!!
Tigers on Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13038]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22359
Joined: 4/24/04
|
Mike Williams made two ridiculous catches late in the game
Feb 6, 2017, 2:58 PM
[ in reply to Stat wise MW ] |
|
as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [79195]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 24916
Joined: 8/29/12
|
Cole Stoudt - GT db's***
Feb 6, 2017, 2:45 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3976]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4990
Joined: 8/9/12
|
Re: Cole Stoudt - GT db's***
Feb 6, 2017, 2:49 PM
|
|
That could be a close top 5 for sure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3422]
TigerPulse: 91%
Posts: 6697
Joined: 10/3/09
|
Re: Best Clemson QB-WR combo?
Feb 6, 2017, 2:50 PM
|
|
I love Renfrow, but Watson-Williams is the better combo. Watson-Renfrow is the clutchest combo tho, in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3976]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4990
Joined: 8/9/12
|
Re: Best Clemson QB-WR combo?
Feb 6, 2017, 2:55 PM
|
|
1. DW to Williams
2. TB to Nuk
3. TB to Sammy
4. DW to Renfrow
5. Whitehurst to Hamilton
Best of the rest: Harper to Kelly, Woody to Gardner
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13038]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22359
Joined: 4/24/04
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13038]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22359
Joined: 4/24/04
|
DW4 and Mike Williams
Feb 6, 2017, 2:57 PM
|
|
Boyd and Watkins probably 2nd
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2772]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3736
Joined: 1/15/13
|
Re: Best Clemson QB-WR combo?
Feb 6, 2017, 5:26 PM
|
|
When all is said and done.....
Could quite possibly be:
T. Lawrence to T. Higgins!
Just sayin'
|
|
|
|
|
|
Team Captain [456]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 681
Joined: 7/2/16
|
Re: Best Clemson QB-WR combo?
Feb 6, 2017, 9:03 PM
|
|
Homer Jordan to Perry Tuttle
Deshaun Watson to Hunter Renfrow.
Tied for 1st obvious reasons
|
|
|
|
|
|
null [null]
TigerPulse: null%
Posts: 1
Joined: 11/21/14
|
Re: Best Clemson QB-WR combo?
Feb 6, 2017, 10:08 PM
|
|
Cole Stoudt and any defense
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1845]
TigerPulse: 83%
Posts: 2788
Joined: 12/14/15
|
Re: Best Clemson QB-WR combo?
Feb 6, 2017, 10:11 PM
|
|
Deshaun to Mike Williams beats DW4 to Renfrow IMO. Tajh to Nuk is a close 2nd
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16240]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12779
Joined: 11/14/09
|
I'm gonna say Tajh / Nuk in my fanspan, which goes back
Feb 6, 2017, 10:15 PM
|
|
to the '78 Gator Bowl when I found great joy in Clemson outscoring Ohio State and then the ensuing D horror, a child interloper amidst a Columbian neighbor and family of garnet and black revelers. Was it New Year's Eve? The sound running out of the room was nothing like I'd ever heard. And Danny Ford's first game. Something else.
Tajh and Nuk hooked up on game-winning plays in the biggest of moments, along with a season full of record setting TD catches and game changing moments that helped usher in the next level. We weren't quite #We2Deep just those few years ago in those areas, but that was legit playmaking in crunch time, things of beauty.
After them, I'd give 2nd to Watson and Renfrow. You can't ask for bigger moments than that combo delivered - when it counted, and when it was needed. Two losses over two years between them, with two league championships, two semi-final wins, and one Big One. Dang.
3rd? Maybe someone on the roster now, perhaps a new #1 even. In the interim though, I'll go Woody to Gardner. It was physical and productive, two playmakers going the distance, and racking up a lot of wins between them.
Boom.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4854]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9113
Joined: 1/15/08
|
Re: I'm gonna say Tajh / Nuk in my fanspan, which goes back
Feb 7, 2017, 3:39 AM
|
|
Gardner got the deep balls, but it was Travis Zachery that was Woody's bread and butter WR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [167]
TigerPulse: 86%
Posts: 99
Joined: 8/14/12
|
Re: Best Clemson QB-WR combo?
Feb 6, 2017, 10:49 PM
|
|
Hunter Johnson to Tee Higgins
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [44032]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 32946
Joined: 2/22/03
|
Rodney Williams to Gary Cooper***
Feb 6, 2017, 11:32 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3812]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3709
Joined: 10/12/08
|
DW4 / Renfrow is #1
Feb 6, 2017, 11:50 PM
|
|
But my number two combo is James Davis and Aaron Kelly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3812]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3709
Joined: 10/12/08
|
James Davis!
Feb 6, 2017, 11:53 PM
|
|
I crack myself up. It may have been Whitehurst or was it Kyle back then? I'm still not fully recovered from the Falcons choke of the century. Wow
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2557]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3678
Joined: 2/18/09
|
KP I believe that year. Just my gut memory...could be wrong***
Feb 6, 2017, 11:56 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1087]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1276
Joined: 7/9/02
|
Parker and Ford made some good plays too***
Feb 7, 2017, 12:07 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 43
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
