»
Topic: Bama shouldn't have got in over
Replies: 3   Last Post: Dec 3, 2017 7:29 PM by: HillBillyTiger
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.


[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 3  

Bama shouldn't have got in over

[1]
Posted: Dec 3, 2017 6:04 PM
 

UCF.

Ranked wins
Bama - #17 LSU, #23 Miss St
UCF - #20 Memphis, #20 Memphis, (#23 USF in AP poll)
advantage - even (or UCF including AP)

losses
Bama - #7 Auburn
UCF - none
advantage - UCF

wins vs >.500 FBS teams
Bama - 5
UCF - 6* (Navy would drop to 6-6 with loss to Army)
advantage - UCF

margin of victory
Bama - 27.6
UCF - 24.2
advantage - Bama

This should be the real argument going on.
(p.s. Bama should be ahead of Ohio St)


Re: Bama shouldn't have got in over


Posted: Dec 3, 2017 6:19 PM
 

if mama and ucf played rn who do you really think would win


Re: Bama shouldn't have got in over


Posted: Dec 3, 2017 6:44 PM
 

UCF would easily beat your mama or my mama or a team full of the best mamas in the nation


Re: Bama shouldn't have got in over


Posted: Dec 3, 2017 7:29 PM
 

I get your point. If they were not bammer would a team with the same resume get in the CFP. I think not. The blue bloods still get too much credit for past success.

The CFP committee keeps getting the 4th slot wrong. The TCU debacle, ohio st last year, bammer this year.


Replies: 3  
[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
1224 people have read this post