»
Topic: Bama is fortunate that they played MSU and not Stanford or Ohio St
Replies: 23   Last Post: Jan 1, 2016 7:55 PM by: JohnFBell®
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.


[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 23  

Bama is fortunate that they played MSU and not Stanford or Ohio St

[2]
Posted: Jan 1, 2016 6:00 PM
 

Bama is a fraud that will be exposed by Superman and the Wayne Train


Re: Bama is fortunate that they played MSU and not Stanford or Ohio St

[1]
Posted: Jan 1, 2016 6:02 PM
 

I don't think Bama is a fraud but they did get "lucky" by getting MSU.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

um that wasn't luck, that was arranged...***

[1]
Posted: Jan 1, 2016 6:03 PM
 



2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: um that wasn't luck, that was arranged...***


Posted: Jan 1, 2016 6:04 PM
 

That is why lucky is "lucky." LOL

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

I thought the process for the final four was right on...

[1]
Posted: Jan 1, 2016 6:06 PM
 

Stanford lost 2 games and Ohio State didn't win their conference. I thought the purpose of the process was to eliminate the guess work. Now we're changing who ought to be there on games being played a month after the season ended.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-franc1968.jpg


Re: I thought the process for the final four was right on...

[1]
Posted: Jan 1, 2016 6:09 PM
 

I'm not basing it on a month after, I didn't think Iowa nor MSU was top 4 all along.


I understand the process, but still believe OSU/Stanford would have been better game than Bama/MSU

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: I thought the process for the final four was right on...


Posted: Jan 1, 2016 6:11 PM
 

Not only that, the committee moved MSU ahead of Oklahoma. Some people feel they did that in order to give Bama the more favorable matchup.

I believe that is what the above poster was implying.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: I thought the process for the final four was right on...


Posted: Jan 1, 2016 6:33 PM
 

YOU ARE DEAD ON!!!!!!!!!!!!STATS PROVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

military_donation.jpg

again, not saying they are not better....


Posted: Jan 1, 2016 6:11 PM
 

But based on how the seaso finished how do you put OSU or Stanford in and leave MSU out?

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-franc1968.jpg


Re: again, not saying they are not better....


Posted: Jan 1, 2016 6:14 PM
 

I don't think we could leave them out but still don't believe either were legit top 4 teams.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: again, not saying they are not better....


Posted: Jan 1, 2016 6:46 PM
 

Didn't OSU lose to Sparty? You guys wont admit that Bama just beat the #3 team 38-0. But yall get fired up if I downplay one of Clemson's wins. Looks like Clemson got lucky as well drawing OU. I think at this point Bama and Clemson are #2 and#1, respectably and we'll have to wait to see what happens on the field.


Re: again, not saying they are not better....

[1]
Posted: Jan 1, 2016 6:52 PM
 

I do believe Bama is the true #2 but still believe they got the better draw with MSU.

Anyone and I mean ANYONE could see OK was more competitive than MSU was. MSU looked completely lost, just as IOWA is looking today. And I don't believe it was all Bama that made MSU look lost. They didn't belong there.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: again, not saying they are not better....


Posted: Jan 1, 2016 6:54 PM
 

Why did MSU move to #3? I believe I recall it was because they beat Iowa. I also believe it's clear Iowa wasn't a true #4 team.

Facts.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: again, not saying they are not better....


Posted: Jan 1, 2016 7:14 PM
 

MSU moved to 3 because they won their conf. Championship game while OU sat at home. Similar to last year when teams from........wait for it.... The same conference dropped from not playing.


Re: again, not saying they are not better....


Posted: Jan 1, 2016 7:17 PM
 

I know why but fact is they won't worthy of #3.

They won their conference, no doubt but they won't a true #3 team. Sorry you don't get it.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: again, not saying they are not better....


Posted: Jan 1, 2016 7:20 PM
 

Or you do get it, but just can't admit it because admitting MSU wasn't a true #3 team means Bama really didn't beat #3.

I understand.

Or either you really are nieve enough to believe MSU was a true #3 team.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: again, not saying they are not better....


Posted: Jan 1, 2016 7:21 PM
 

Let me guess, Iowa #5 is getting demolished but your logic says Iowa is a true top 5 team.


Just using your logic.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

wake vandy would be a good game too***


Posted: Jan 1, 2016 7:05 PM
 



2019 purple level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg


Re: Bama is fortunate that they played MSU and not Stanford or Ohio St


Posted: Jan 1, 2016 6:10 PM
 

I'm glad we didn't get either one of those after seeing them play today. Both have definitely looked better than MSU and OU

military_donation.jpg

Re: Bama is fortunate that they played MSU and not Stanford or Ohio St


Posted: Jan 1, 2016 6:12 PM
 

I thought OU looked ok, we just whipped that '+#


But MSU and now Iowa look completely lost.

2019 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Any team that has the same style of offense as Bama


Posted: Jan 1, 2016 6:12 PM
 

will get crushed by Bama. Look at LSU, UF, UGA, and Michigan State, you can't just line up and run right at them an expect to win they're way to deep and talented and will wear you down. You have to spread them out and keep them off balance with the QB run and the pass.


That has been the key to their NC wins


Posted: Jan 1, 2016 6:54 PM
 

throughout the Saban years. They get lesser versions of themselves to beat up on. Texas was going to be a bit different and then Colt McCoy went down and it was game over for all intensive purposes. This will truly be Bama's first go at a title against a team that isn't a crappier version of themselves. I hope we uptempo it and leave them gasping for air and faking injuries like LSU and Saban whining afterwards about it.


Re: Bama is fortunate that they played MSU and not Stanford or Ohio St


Posted: Jan 1, 2016 6:19 PM
 

If you think Bama is a fraud, you'll be in for a rude awakening. I'm pretty sure our coaches don't feel that way. This will be the best defense we have faced in a long time.


the way it played out the winner of the MSU Iowa game...


Posted: Jan 1, 2016 7:55 PM
 

Was going to be in and the committee had no other option. Stanford would have been selected if they had only one loss. But they didn't.

It was obvious that Oklahoma was a much better team than MSU but the reality is it wouldn't have mattered who was 3 or 4. Clemson would have beaten MSU and Bama would have beaten OK. So the title game would be the same.

2019 white level member

Replies: 23  

TIGER TICKETS

FB GAME: South Carolina
FOR SALE: For Sale: 2 tickets for the South Carolina game. Section 501 - $95 per ticket. Please text me if ...

Buy or Sell CU Tickets and More in Tiger Tickets!

[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
1460 people have read this post