|
Replies: 25
| visibility 1
|
CU Guru [1335]
TigerPulse: 82%
Posts: 2572
Joined: 1/16/02
|
Do we have an AD with guts enough to fire Jack and
May 31, 2013, 3:35 PM
|
|
gets us a coach who can coach
|
|
|
|
 |
Legend [19352]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 22266
Joined: 4/25/04
|
Re: Do we have an AD with guts enough to fire Jack and
May 31, 2013, 3:36 PM
|
|
such a goober
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1335]
TigerPulse: 82%
Posts: 2572
Joined: 1/16/02
|
and a sunshine pumper shows up
May 31, 2013, 3:38 PM
|
|
no wonder this program has only won 1 ACC title in 20 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [61827]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 39640
Joined: 12/16/01
|
I don't believe 117 is a pumper ...
May 31, 2013, 3:40 PM
|
|
Unless he is channeling deroberts with the "goober" term.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19352]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 22266
Joined: 4/25/04
|
Re: I don't believe 117 is a pumper ...
May 31, 2013, 3:42 PM
|
|
Thanks 1989 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19352]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 22266
Joined: 4/25/04
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1335]
TigerPulse: 82%
Posts: 2572
Joined: 1/16/02
|
sorry my mistake***
May 31, 2013, 3:43 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [73569]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 78044
Joined: 11/30/98
|
JRad is known for having a heavy trigger finger***
May 31, 2013, 3:36 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6883]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 9173
Joined: 7/11/03
|
Who is JRad?***
May 31, 2013, 3:37 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19352]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 22266
Joined: 4/25/04
|
Re: Who is JRad?***
May 31, 2013, 3:37 PM
|
|
AD
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6883]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 9173
Joined: 7/11/03
|
You mean DRad?***
May 31, 2013, 3:39 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19352]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 22266
Joined: 4/25/04
|
Re: You mean DRad?***
May 31, 2013, 3:39 PM
|
|
yea but I figured he was talking about the AD. I am sure you figured the same.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2826]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4497
Joined: 9/14/03
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1400]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 1393
Joined: 11/30/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2826]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4497
Joined: 9/14/03
|
Yep. D Hall is also losing to a lower seed today.
May 31, 2013, 4:16 PM
|
|
"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." A. Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1203]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 1960
Joined: 10/27/06
|
He has the guts to fire him, but a lot of pumpers are donors
May 31, 2013, 3:37 PM
|
|
too. They must be considered.
I'm a bit disappointed that the sport can't offer every player a scholarship. That's something we can affect--better talent covers up poor coaching.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [61827]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 39640
Joined: 12/16/01
|
Don't fire him ... Discuss retirement options***
May 31, 2013, 3:37 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64589]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88994
Joined: 3/27/01
|
Contrary to what some people on this forum will tell you....
May 31, 2013, 3:41 PM
|
|
I guarantee you that DRad doesn't think Jack Leggett is on such solid footing that he will be at Clemson as long as he wants.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6937]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 22594
Joined: 5/4/03
|
Re:I would make it so hot for him that he would gladly move
May 31, 2013, 3:44 PM
|
|
om.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [281]
TigerPulse: 83%
Posts: 849
Joined: 10/29/08
|
Re: Do we have an AD with guts enough to fire Jack and
May 31, 2013, 3:42 PM
|
|
If you knew anything about the AD you wouldn't even ask this question. He was the AD at Georgia Tech before Clemson. Do you know who the head coach at Tech is and how he has done lately? Suffice it to say, Danny Hall has been the biggest underachiever in college baseball for the last 10 years, even worse than Perno. Jack's track record is much better. He has nothing to worry about.
> gets us a coach who can coach
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6937]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 22594
Joined: 5/4/03
|
Re: He has plenty to worry about.***
May 31, 2013, 3:45 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [816]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 1089
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Ask Itoro Coleman.***
May 31, 2013, 5:25 PM
|
|
nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8681]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8888
Joined: 10/19/11
|
Re: Do we have an AD with guts enough to fire Jack and
May 31, 2013, 5:38 PM
|
|
Yeah let's just fire a hall of fame coach that has taken us to several CWS and Super Regionals and has won over 1200 games because had a few "down years" lately (all of which have made the tourney). I'm sure that would be very appealing to other coaching canidates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1038]
TigerPulse: 36%
Posts: 2527
Joined: 8/10/11
|
Not saying Jack should be fired but he definitely should be
May 31, 2013, 6:04 PM
|
|
evaluated each and every year at the end of the season. Hopefully Radz will objectively evaluate him and not be in awe of him like TDP was.
It may be time to get some new blood injected in to the program. I think things are just "stale" with Jack now. We need to get someone younger, more energetic, and with a more positive attitude than Jack. The program has been in a steady decline last few years. This whole "we're young" is not a legitimate excuse. We're only "young" because of epic failures by Jack and the staff on the recruiting trail and in managing the roster. If we are indeed "young" its because of Jack that we are. So, it all falls on his shoulders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7114]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7324
Joined: 11/30/98
|
He shouldn't be fired this season...
May 31, 2013, 6:22 PM
|
|
But given the collapse in the post season, the clock is ticking for Jack. He and his staff need to get this team and this program performing better in important games. The performance in the ACC tournament and ESPECIALLY the showing today were disgraceful. Today was just unacceptable. We were punked by a mediocre team AT BEST. There is NO excuse for that... even the most kool-aid sodden pumper should be concerned.
Message was edited by: Flying Tiger®
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1464]
TigerPulse: 79%
Posts: 3530
Joined: 9/25/03
|
It's been this way the last 20 years for him. Don't think
Jun 1, 2013, 8:39 AM
|
|
that its going to change now. When I think of JL I think of being double dipped by SCU twice to get too the CWS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 25
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
