Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
As much as I can tell, this is how I would role with the D
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 1
| visibility 718

As much as I can tell, this is how I would role with the D


Sep 23, 2012, 8:35 PM

Our DE's are more 3-4 type than 4-3 so I would just go with it. I would also think about moving J.Watson to DE for 3-4 purposes. He seems Like the type that traditional 3-4 teams use in the DE spot (see Steelers). You can tell the other moves here:

DE: Goodman
Crawford
N: Reader (fits to a T)
Williams
Watkins
Jarrett (just to small)
DE:Watson

OLB:V.Beasley (stand him up and let him use his speed)
LB:Steward
LB:Anthony
OLB:Meeks (makes our defense faster)He is bigger and slower than Blanks

Boundary Corner:not sureCDavis,Robinson,Or Peters hot hand plays.
Field Corner: Breeland

Free S: Blanks
Strong S: Townsend (faster and tougher )

It all starts with the DL and since we do not really have any true athletic DE's just line them up over the tackles, move V.Beasley back, move Meeks down and move blanks back to safety to start making plays now

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Understand where youre comming from


Sep 23, 2012, 8:55 PM

but it wont happen. One of the biggest reasons Dabo wanted Venables was because of his 4-3 base defensive philosophy. Thats the defense Dabo wants so, for better or worse, thats what were stuck with.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 1
| visibility 718
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic