|
Replies: 9
| visibility 1,116
|
Legend [16112]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26423
Joined: 11/18/03
|
Alright Basketball fans, what's your take on the Flagrant
Mar 17, 2017, 4:07 PM
|
|
Foul at the end of the Seton Hall/Arky game?
|
|
|
|
 |
All-In [28193]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14030
Joined: 6/27/14
|
Re: Alright Basketball fans, what's your take on the Flagrant
Mar 17, 2017, 4:10 PM
|
|
it hosed seton hall - and my opening round game in that region. so yeah, not happy about it
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1270]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 923
Joined: 12/5/09
|
Bad Call IMO!!!******
Mar 17, 2017, 4:14 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16112]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26423
Joined: 11/18/03
|
yeah, I had the Hall too...That's why I was asking...I
Mar 17, 2017, 4:26 PM
[ in reply to Re: Alright Basketball fans, what's your take on the Flagrant ] |
|
wanted to know if it was my bracket bias or did they just make a horrible call that ended up deciding the game...The Talking Heads just had an Official on who defended the call(shocker right?) and it just made me mad because it appeared to be a really horrible call, the kind that usually go against us but is a good no call when it happens to us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [21722]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13534
Joined: 11/8/13
|
Weak.
Mar 17, 2017, 4:15 PM
|
|
There was no malicious intent with the foul.
Guess the refs want to protect that basketball conference.
~JKB
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4995]
TigerPulse: 59%
Posts: 8298
Joined: 10/8/08
|
Re: Alright Basketball fans, what's your take on the Flagrant
Mar 17, 2017, 4:16 PM
|
|
Dirty play. Seton Hall player should have been kicked out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12942]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6228
Joined: 1/26/16
|
this is a tough one for me...
Mar 17, 2017, 4:20 PM
|
|
everyone in the building knew they were going to foul, and I don't think there was any malicious intent-- however, that being said, the explanation given by the refs was that there was no play on the ball--- which is also true if you watch it....
Players are taught to foul by going for the ball, even though many times they don't.
If you buy into the fact that games should be officiated the same throughout, and shouldn't change b/c of situations, then it was likely the right call...
The bigger issue here for me is consistency. One game an official knows he's going to foul, and it's not a flagrant. The next, a different official knows he's going to foul, and calls a flagrant b/c he didn't make a play on the ball.
There almost needs to be a provision to the rule to change the definition of flagrant with under a minute to go--- although I'm not sure how you do that.
Hate to see a game decided like that though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16112]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26423
Joined: 11/18/03
|
yeah, I know the rule, but as you pointed out, they NEVER
Mar 17, 2017, 4:33 PM
|
|
call it that way(with the exception of JB a couple of years ago) consistently, so it really pissed me off when the Official On Set deferred the the definition...Their interpretation shouldn't decide the game...I know, I know...I heard it as i wrote it, but I posted it anyway 
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1455]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1155
Joined: 1/10/14
|
Re: Alright Basketball fans, what's your take on the Flagrant
Mar 17, 2017, 4:26 PM
|
|
Bad call. Accidental trip. Nothing intentional or malicious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [9]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12
Joined: 11/27/16
|
Re: Alright Basketball fans, what's your take on the Flagrant
Mar 17, 2017, 4:33 PM
|
|
Terrible Call. The refs were suspect the whole game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 9
| visibility 1,116
|
|
|
50
