|
Replies: 17
| visibility 1,858
|
Walk-On [108]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 220
Joined: 2/24/13
|
Worst officiated game...
Nov 6, 2014, 10:50 PM
|
|
I've seen in a while!
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1224]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 982
Joined: 9/30/06
|
At least since last year's Orange Bowl!***
Nov 6, 2014, 10:51 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7015]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 12738
Joined: 11/21/99
|
Re: Worst officiated game...
Nov 6, 2014, 10:52 PM
|
|
Agree...bad
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4787]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9986
Joined: 6/12/10
|
when the acc head of officials disagrees with a targeting
Nov 6, 2014, 10:57 PM
|
|
call, and it is UPHELD by the replay official, you know we have problems. that was a bs call on r.s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5496]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5412
Joined: 3/9/11
|
Re: when the acc head of officials disagrees with a targeting
Nov 6, 2014, 10:59 PM
|
|
Hopefully they will appeal. But I don't think it will help.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4787]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9986
Joined: 6/12/10
|
i am thinking they will appeal, and i do think he will be
Nov 6, 2014, 11:02 PM
|
|
able to start vs. ga. tech. i sure hope i am right, this time, anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [139]
TigerPulse: 71%
Posts: 515
Joined: 10/7/07
|
Re: i am thinking they will appeal, and i do think he will be
Nov 6, 2014, 11:08 PM
|
|
Did you think they would overturn the call during the game. I did not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4787]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9986
Joined: 6/12/10
|
yes i did. i thought they would uphold the penalty (???)
Nov 6, 2014, 11:11 PM
|
|
but conclude that robert led with the shoulder into the chest of the receiver, which is not targeting as the rule is written.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [53779]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43562
Joined: 11/17/03
|
And again. If it is not targeting, how is it a penalty?***
Nov 6, 2014, 11:43 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4787]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9986
Joined: 6/12/10
|
correct me if i am wrong, but i don't think they can change
Nov 6, 2014, 11:45 PM
|
|
the penalty call, just the targeting call. that was what i was trying to say.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [171]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 87
Joined: 6/17/12
|
Re: when the acc head of officials disagrees with a targeting
Nov 6, 2014, 11:01 PM
[ in reply to when the acc head of officials disagrees with a targeting ] |
|
Hmmmm... kinda odd how all BS the penalties have ceased since that call too.... weird huh?
Message was edited by: Big ol Tiger toes®
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [927]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1379
Joined: 11/13/05
|
Was Wake called for any offensive holding calls????
Nov 6, 2014, 11:02 PM
|
|
ANY?????
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1555]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 2454
Joined: 2/10/06
|
ONCE....and it was declined...***
Nov 6, 2014, 11:07 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [991]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1491
Joined: 3/6/01
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [211]
TigerPulse: 73%
Posts: 416
Joined: 3/1/02
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [240]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 382
Joined: 6/13/13
|
Re: Worst officiated game...
Nov 6, 2014, 11:06 PM
|
|
I don't think there was another flag after that BS call....think they knew they had gone way too far
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [970]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2416
Joined: 4/2/10
|
Where's Ron Cherry when you need him?***
Nov 6, 2014, 11:13 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1898]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3418
Joined: 11/7/01
|
Clemson MUST appeal that
Nov 6, 2014, 11:58 PM
|
|
dumb, wrong "targeting" call.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 17
| visibility 1,858
|
|
|
50
