|
Replies: 13
| visibility 1,376
|
110%er [5513]
TigerPulse: 73%
Posts: 6991
Joined: 4/6/10
|
#1 Bama #2 Clemson #3 Washington #4 OSU
Nov 30, 2016, 9:09 AM
|
|
Thats how I see the polls Sunday. Big Ten Champ Wisconsin gets left out. But I could also see the committee try to protect Bama by flipping OSU and Washington, which would be complete BS! If it does end up like I predict, I REALLY like our chances.
|
|
|
|
 |
Legend [17907]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8935
Joined: 12/24/96
|
I like our chances no matter who we play
Nov 30, 2016, 9:11 AM
|
|
Ohio State or Washington. And then Bama for the title.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [9656]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9000
Joined: 11/16/01
|
Re: #1 Bama #2 Clemson #3 Washington #4 OSU
Nov 30, 2016, 9:11 AM
|
|
We better get ready to play Ohio St if we win Saturday. No way they expose Bama to that risk
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [963]
TigerPulse: 74%
Posts: 1176
Joined: 12/14/11
|
Re: #1 Bama #2 Clemson #3 Washington #4 OSU
Nov 30, 2016, 9:31 AM
|
|
I agree. Media would rather have bama play Washington (easy win) in first round than Bama play OSU. Either way this is Clemson year. I hope everyone in media continues to talk as though bama is unbeatable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4974]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 5276
Joined: 6/2/03
|
Re: #1 Bama #2 Clemson #3 Washington #4 OSU
Nov 30, 2016, 9:36 AM
|
|
Hi Greg this is Clemson's year. I think we're definitely the most complete team. We have the best quarterback in the group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4974]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 5276
Joined: 6/2/03
|
Re: #1 Bama #2 Clemson #3 Washington #4 OSU
Nov 30, 2016, 9:37 AM
|
|
I agree! Sorry about the voice to text screw up!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [787]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 1410
Joined: 9/22/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6280]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 12979
Joined: 4/21/15
|
Re: #1 Bama #2 Clemson #3 Washington #4 OSU
Nov 30, 2016, 9:12 AM
|
|
I do not think Ohio St gets jumped by Washington. It has nothing to do with protecting Bama. Those 12 people do not care about Bama. Ohio St has much better Ws and a more difficult schedule than Washington.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5513]
TigerPulse: 73%
Posts: 6991
Joined: 4/6/10
|
If OSU is not punished for not winning their conference
Nov 30, 2016, 9:15 AM
|
|
Every conference should drop their worthless championship game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16240]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12779
Joined: 11/14/09
|
Head to head and conference championships are stated
Nov 30, 2016, 11:11 AM
|
|
to be differentiators when there is a "marginal difference" between teams. The committee has made it clear that they consider OSU squarely better than those that follow, thus removing the need for those metrics in this case. Now were us or Washington to lose Saturday and you're now comparing 2-loss non-champs vs a 2-loss champion, that's when those metrics would really kick in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6135]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6921
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Committee wants Bama-OSU in NCG, so OSU #4, UW #4***
Nov 30, 2016, 9:14 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [73569]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 78044
Joined: 11/30/98
|
If Clemson and Wash lose this weekend it could be
Nov 30, 2016, 9:16 AM
|
|
Bama, OSU, MICH, WISC
how's that for crazy
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7718]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7444
Joined: 1/10/16
|
Re: #1 Bama #2 Clemson #3 Washington #4 OSU
Nov 30, 2016, 9:18 AM
|
|
If Wisconsin wins the BIG that strengthens Ohio States resume. IMO they wont get jumped if that happens.
I think Penn State beats Wisconsin regardless. If that happens then Ohio State could possibly get jumped if Washington puts up an impressive performance in their game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [394]
TigerPulse: 89%
Posts: 515
Joined: 11/30/98
|
You are exactly correct.***
Nov 30, 2016, 10:59 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 13
| visibility 1,376
|
|
|
50
