Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
What group is better? 2014, 2015, or 2016 D?
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 10
| visibility 870

What group is better? 2014, 2015, or 2016 D?


Oct 27, 2016, 2:02 PM

I think this years D is playing as good as I have ever seen. We hit hard and play together! Our pass coverage is as good as ever and this is the best DT group we have had. DE and LB was deep in 2014. 2015 we had plenty of NFL guys but I would argue this is the best Clemson D I have seen in my lifetime(1992).

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I vote 2014 hands down


Oct 27, 2016, 2:08 PM

Most of the season we won with just defense

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I vote 2014 hands down


Oct 27, 2016, 2:15 PM

Imagine if Vic Beasley played at 246lb when he was at Clemson... he had 30 sacks in basically 3 seasons playing at 230lbs. Unreal.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: What group is better? 2014, 2015, or 2016 D?


Oct 27, 2016, 2:10 PM

I'd rank them:
1. 2014
2. 2016
3. 2015

The key difference in between 2014 and 2016 is the front seven. As good as our front seven is this year, 2014's was rediculously talented, deep, and experienced.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Brad Brownell: more losses than any other coach in school history.


Re: What group is better? 2014, 2015, or 2016 D?


Oct 27, 2016, 2:11 PM

2017

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I think its 2014 without questions.


Oct 27, 2016, 2:12 PM

They had a terrible opener nd still ended up #1 in the country

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Probably 2014, but this years defense is currently


Oct 27, 2016, 2:15 PM

rated a little higher in both S&P+ and FEI than the 2014 group. We will see if they can maintain that pace. The 2015 defense was a step below, largely due to the struggles late in the year. We had poor defensive outings against State, Cuse, SCar, UNC, and Bama.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

2014


Oct 27, 2016, 2:20 PM

that was a shutdown d - this yr is really really good. stronger in the back than last yr. can't believe the only issue has been turning the ball over to keep good teams in game. protect the ball and these games are not even close

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I for one am glad you are stopping. You are one of the most ignorant posters ever. You obviously think very highly of your own opinion, unlike the rest of us - RockHillTiger


agree. Seems like overall depth on 2014 was a bit better.


Oct 27, 2016, 2:34 PM

All three years solid though. It's been great!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: agree. Seems like overall depth on 2014 was a bit better.


Oct 27, 2016, 3:23 PM

what bv has done recruiting and developing is remarkable

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I for one am glad you are stopping. You are one of the most ignorant posters ever. You obviously think very highly of your own opinion, unlike the rest of us - RockHillTiger


hmmm i'll take a stab at it


Oct 27, 2016, 3:17 PM

statistically 2014 is better
athletically 2015 is better
most disciplined 2016 is better


overall BV takes what he has and coaches them up to be great

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 10
| visibility 870
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic