So, pretty much the NCAA is saying that the value of an education is not enough to compensate big time football and basketball players. But if we are going to put a value on participating in a sport (that can gain income) how would these players not be considered professional and their income is taxed? "Trade" is seen as taxable income. So, in the case of a student athlete, if you choose to make money from endorsements from your services rendered to a university, I don't see how the IRS will not look at it as taxable. But, here is the problem - would the bottom tier players be taxed on their scholly as well? Even though they get absolutely no interest in endorsement deals?
The Senator from North Carolina who is proposing the taxing of scholarships plainly said it would only apply to those receiving money from endorsements.
I brought up this subject of fairness earlier and got some really stupid replies about the county fair. I agree with you 100 per cent. There is no way this proposed action is designed to benefit the average college athlete. Those whose image is marketable now will get their rewards when they move on in their athletic career.
The 95 percent of the others will do without even though their dedication to the team is equal to the superstars.