Replies: 31
| visibility 1
|
CU Guru [1534]
TigerPulse: 55%
Posts: 1325
Joined: 10/1/06
|
To all naysayers, name a CU team since the '81 champs that
Sep 24, 2012, 8:24 PM
|
|
this current squad wouldn't beat by two touchdowns, including last year's team. You can't do it.
And, says here that next year's team can beat this current team by 10 points.
If this program was a stock, I'd buy it.
|
|
|
|
Team Captain [459]
TigerPulse: 68%
Posts: 1080
Joined: 7/19/04
|
Re: To all naysayers, name a CU team since the '81 champs that
Sep 24, 2012, 8:28 PM
|
|
1982, 1983, 1984, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 2003 and there are more.... you have to play defense to win games.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6057]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5232
Joined: 9/6/99
|
I wouldn't go that far. There were some great teams in the
Sep 24, 2012, 8:28 PM
|
|
mid to late 1980's, but the game has changed so much. Player development and strength training are huge now. Seems natural to assume this guys would light up our old defenses, but you never know.
I'll tell you this. 1981 Clemson on Bill Walsh Football on the Super Nintendo was on STUD team. I'd put them against some of the best video game teams of ALL-TIME and that's a fact.
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
This offense isnt as good as FSU 88 nor 89 and we completely
Sep 24, 2012, 8:41 PM
|
|
shut them down and dominated both years.
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [84]
TigerPulse: 80%
Posts: 177
Joined: 6/3/02
|
Re: To all naysayers, name a CU team since the '81 champs that
Sep 24, 2012, 8:29 PM
|
|
try 1987 through 1991. thanks for playing.
Our D is soft. get over it. I count on one hand how many hard hits we have had on D. I love our O, but D wins the close ones.
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [854]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 625
Joined: 6/29/12
|
Re: Re: To all naysayers, name a CU team since the '81 champs that
Sep 24, 2012, 8:32 PM
|
|
The man's point is that we, as a team, are on the rise. Try not knitpicking and look at the big picture.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6877]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 9157
Joined: 7/11/03
|
We are just answering his question, which he said we...
Sep 24, 2012, 8:47 PM
|
|
couldn't do. If he didn't want responses, he shouldn't have asked. Sorry.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4747]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 6973
Joined: 1/24/07
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2894]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3689
Joined: 3/13/03
|
I don't know about our Offensive squad, but you could line u
Sep 24, 2012, 8:33 PM
|
|
p Levon Kirkland, Ed McDaniel, Doug Brewster and John Johnson against the entire FSU offense and they could've done a better job of shedding blocks and tackling than the entire defense did Saturday night.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6403]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4626
Joined: 8/20/07
|
Re: I don't know about our Offensive squad, but you could line u
Sep 24, 2012, 8:45 PM
|
|
David Davis & Chester McGlockton also
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7913]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13703
Joined: 1/8/02
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6877]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 9157
Joined: 7/11/03
|
Here goes..'82,'83,'88,89 for sure, possibly'90. All....
Sep 24, 2012, 8:34 PM
|
|
because of Defense and Offense that controls the ball and pounds you physically. The teams listed above would make the current team cry like babies.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7913]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13703
Joined: 1/8/02
|
completely agree...it would be a physical pounding***
Sep 24, 2012, 10:02 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [83015]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 80127
Joined: 11/29/99
|
82, 83, 87, 88, 89, 90, and 91.***
Sep 24, 2012, 8:35 PM
|
|
null
Message was edited by: josephg®
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1112]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 1940
Joined: 7/8/99
|
Yes I agree***
Sep 24, 2012, 9:59 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: To all naysayers, name a CU team since the '81 champs that
Sep 24, 2012, 8:39 PM
|
|
Not saying this is the greatest team since '81, but it's the most exciting I've seen since that time. Of course, it's just my opinion, but when was the last time we had firepower like this? C'mon - if you weren't excited watching this team play Saturday, you're pretty much never satisfied, and need to find another thing to support in your life. These guys have a long way to go, but dayum, can't you tell it's better than it's been in a very long time? If you can't, then we can just disagree.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6877]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 9157
Joined: 7/11/03
|
"Team" means all facets. I wasn't very excited watching....
Sep 24, 2012, 8:44 PM
|
|
our D or our kickoffs. Offense is another story, except when they pressed for 4 series in a row during FSU's run.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [30455]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 62651
Joined: 10/4/99
|
either of the 1988 or 1989 teams.***
Sep 24, 2012, 8:39 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
81, 82, 83, 88, 89, 90, 91***
Sep 24, 2012, 8:39 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7913]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13703
Joined: 1/8/02
|
I would agree...especially 89...that defense was INCREDIBLE
Sep 24, 2012, 9:59 PM
|
|
those four LB's were awesome...they would run circles around this entire defense.
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14751]
TigerPulse: 93%
Posts: 22551
Joined: 5/14/03
|
Some of the avg teams with good defense and an OK running
Sep 24, 2012, 8:39 PM
|
|
game would be able to keep this offense off the field, run it down this D's throat. So it would be a sharp contrast in style and no telling the outcome.
I also don't agree that this squad would automatically beat last years.
Whitehurst would carve up this defense, and Dantzler would probably run for 400 yards on it. How many would spiller run for?
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6877]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 9157
Joined: 7/11/03
|
Priester!!!!***
Sep 24, 2012, 8:49 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur [36]
TigerPulse: 25%
Posts: 143
Joined: 4/27/12
|
Defense wins championships.
Sep 24, 2012, 9:06 PM
|
|
As Clemson fans you should know that. Your offense won you games last year. But come time for the ACC Champ game, your defense won it.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7114]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7323
Joined: 11/30/98
|
How old are you, 12?
Sep 24, 2012, 9:07 PM
|
|
Any recollection at all of the teams we had in the late 80's?
Clemson used to have one of the best defenses in the nation. Now we have no defense. That's unacceptable.
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16472]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11652
Joined: 9/1/01
|
For starters, give me the 89 team that among other things
Sep 24, 2012, 9:15 PM
|
|
whacked a good FSU team in Tally and killed Major Harris in the Gator Bowl I think it was. Defense was killer!
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7913]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13703
Joined: 1/8/02
|
Wayne Simmons was an incredible LB on that team...
Sep 24, 2012, 10:01 PM
|
|
incredible and he wasn't the best
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2303]
TigerPulse: 64%
Posts: 4686
Joined: 5/28/10
|
Re: To all naysayers, name a CU team since the '81 champs that
Sep 24, 2012, 9:47 PM
|
|
Sorry, but you're wrong. The 1989 team was pretty #### strong.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3257]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7167
Joined: 7/27/99
|
1982, 1989, 1990...............the D wins championships***
Sep 24, 2012, 9:52 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7913]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13703
Joined: 1/8/02
|
89.....no chance this team beats that team....NO CHANCE***
Sep 24, 2012, 9:57 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [40875]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42931
Joined: 11/30/98
|
89 was the most talented team ever***
Sep 24, 2012, 10:05 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7913]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13703
Joined: 1/8/02
|
completely agree....it's astounding to look at the NFL
Sep 24, 2012, 10:09 PM
|
|
talent off of that team....I count EIGHT guys from the defense who played in the NFL...I'm sure I'm missing some. If you think this team could essentially beat an NFL defense you're fooling yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7913]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13703
Joined: 1/8/02
|
Wayne Simmons made the NFL and he backed up
Sep 24, 2012, 10:13 PM
|
|
Levon Kirkland one of the best Pittsburg Steeler LB's ever. James Lott and Dexter Davis played in the NFL. Chester McGlockton is one of the top 4 defensive linemen ever at Clemson. John Johnson made the NFL for the 49ers. Ed McDaniel played for years for the Vikings.
|
|
|
|
Replies: 31
| visibility 1
|
|
|