|
Wake backed out of next year's scheduled game at Ole Miss. Seems like a wimpy
|
Replies: 31
| visibility 3710
|
All-In [10383]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
Posts: 11897
Joined: 1999
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Elite [72077]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 117179
Joined: 1998
|
Re: Wake backed out of next year's scheduled game at Ole Miss. Seems like a wimpy
Sep 17, 2024, 9:54 AM
|
|
well their sorry home performance vs Ole Miss and now this sure doesnt make them or the ACC look very good
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2154]
TigerPulse: 96%
32
|
Re: Wake backed out of next year's scheduled game at Ole Miss. Seems like a wimpy
Sep 17, 2024, 5:21 PM
|
|
I believe it's obvious that Wake is going back to being, well, Wake ..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [26443]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 33034
Joined: 2009
|
Pretty weak indeed***
1
Sep 17, 2024, 10:11 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [25121]
TigerPulse: 94%
54
Posts: 17048
Joined: 2002
|
At least Wake handled it better than Covid Norvell
5
5
Sep 17, 2024, 10:17 AM
|
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [72077]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 117179
Joined: 1998
|
Re: At least Wake handled it better than Covid Norvell
1
Sep 17, 2024, 10:21 AM
|
|
aww but he had a little tickle in his throat I'll be. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5450]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
The rest of Wake's 2025 OOC
5
5
Sep 17, 2024, 10:21 AM
|
|
consists of: Kennesaw St, Western Carolina and Delaware, thats some stiff competition, dead stiff.
Come on Wake, that's pathetic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [52899]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 43498
Joined: 2004
|
I would expect nothing less from Weak Florist.
3
Sep 17, 2024, 10:34 AM
|
|
Things like this are why the ACC is a joke.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [29942]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 17228
Joined: 2008
|
Re: Wake backed out of next year's scheduled game at Ole Miss. Seems like a wimpy
Sep 17, 2024, 10:58 AM
|
|
I have to agree with Kiffin. Very ##### thing of Wake to do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12610]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
Posts: 13921
Joined: 2010
|
Re: Wake backed out of next year's scheduled game at Ole Miss. Seems like a wimpy
2
Sep 17, 2024, 11:02 AM
|
|
I'm sure Ole Miss is not crying too loudly about it. Many SEC teams love playing at least 3 cupcakes for their noncon. They will find another one to come take the bag.
We should offer to take Wakes place and then schedule an Ole Miss return game @ DV further down the line. Having LSU and Ole Miss on the schedule next year would be fun. That would show the A She She cowards how to do it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1628]
TigerPulse: 98%
31
|
Re: Wake backed out of next year's scheduled game at Ole Miss. Seems like a wimpy
1
Sep 17, 2024, 3:16 PM
|
|
Wake is a cupcake game for Ole Miss.
It would be awesome if Clemson was able to take that spot on their schedule. I would love to take a road trip to Oxford for a game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [169]
TigerPulse: 99%
12
|
We should let weak forest have Troy
2
Sep 17, 2024, 11:13 AM
|
|
and go and play the rebs! I’m down for that.
Wish LK would have said something like, I understand why they did it. They can’t compete with us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12610]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
Posts: 13921
Joined: 2010
|
Re: We should let weak forest have Troy
1
Sep 17, 2024, 11:15 AM
|
|
Absolutely. Let's do it! Always wanted to play down there. Someone call Neff!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [555]
TigerPulse: 65%
20
|
Re: We should let weak forest have Troy
Sep 17, 2024, 11:23 AM
|
|
Why not Tennessee?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12610]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
Posts: 13921
Joined: 2010
|
Re: We should let weak forest have Troy
Sep 17, 2024, 11:31 AM
|
|
I'm sure we have tried. Your side is probably the issue.
Clemson has always scheduled a second SEC opponent non con other than South Carolina (Georgia, Auburn, Alabama, Texas A&M) in the years we aren't mandated now by the ACC to schedule a non con against Notre Dame.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [169]
TigerPulse: 99%
12
|
We open up with
Sep 17, 2024, 2:08 PM
|
|
LSU next year. LSU, Ole Miss, Furman & chicken U would be a nice OOC schedule.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [22682]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 12708
Joined: 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1056]
TigerPulse: 85%
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [66711]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 89690
Joined: 2001
|
There is no reason for Wake to play a tough OOC schedule...
Sep 17, 2024, 11:31 AM
|
|
since they have ZERO chance of ever making it to he CFP, so why not load-up on creampuffs, and try to put your players in a position to receive an invitation to a nice bowl game. The exact same thing holds true for the Capons.
Who wouldn't want to go to Boston, New York, Annapolis or El Paso in December?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12610]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
Posts: 13921
Joined: 2010
|
Re: There is no reason for Wake to play a tough OOC schedule...
Sep 17, 2024, 11:33 AM
|
|
To be the BEST you got to play the Best. Be sad to buy tickets to a school that doesn't have that attitude.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [66711]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 89690
Joined: 2001
|
"Best" is a pipe dream for a school like Wake...
Sep 17, 2024, 12:48 PM
|
|
The most they can hope for is simply to be the best version of themselves they can be which is generally going to be a 6 to 7 win team.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [87955]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 24548
Joined: 2006
|
Weak Forest is scared.***
2
Sep 17, 2024, 11:32 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [28013]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 21524
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Weak Forest is scared.***
1
Sep 17, 2024, 12:04 PM
|
|
Look at the OOC games the SEC schedules. They are less than cupcakes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [187]
TigerPulse: 52%
12
|
Re: Weak Forest is scared.***
Sep 17, 2024, 2:10 PM
|
|
Total bush league I can’t believe their in the ACC they should be in the Big South with Charleston Southern
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7762]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
Posts: 15668
Joined: 2001
|
It seems they cancelled earlier in the week which
Sep 17, 2024, 1:32 PM
|
|
was prior to 12 month window so I believe $1mil buyout is actually $750K. Interested to know their reasoning and what they have planned. Another dud of a team at home for 2025 or someone that can give them a home game in 2026 for away game this year??? In either case seems to be sulky without some #### good reasoning. Your future buyouts will be a lot higher and people will be wary of you. WF needs to come forward with a good explanation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3528]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: Wake backed out of next year's scheduled game at Ole Miss. Seems like a wimpy
Sep 17, 2024, 2:42 PM
|
|
I heard about it during the game, about the fifteenth time an Ole Miss player flopped for a free time out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4435]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: Wake backed out of next year's scheduled game at Ole Miss. Seems like a wimpy
Sep 17, 2024, 2:55 PM
|
|
They needed an extra home game for the 80k that will be in attendance!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [6056]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [626]
TigerPulse: 84%
21
|
Re: Wake backed out of next year's scheduled game at Ole Miss. Seems like a wimpy
Sep 18, 2024, 4:58 PM
|
|
Don't blame them as the two football programs are worlds apart in terms of talent and emphasis on their football programs. Oregon State is a much better fit...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2640]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: Wake backed out of next year's scheduled game at Ole Miss. Seems like a wimpy
Sep 18, 2024, 5:25 PM
|
|
It’s amazing to me that we have fans who want to stay in this conference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1663]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Wake backed out of next year's scheduled game at Ole Miss. Seems like a wimpy
Sep 18, 2024, 5:29 PM
|
|
Whats the incentive to play hard games anyways? If you win then there will be some excuse like they were just banged up from the SEC grind.
If you lose it derails your season.
All you have to really worry about is winning the conference and getting the AQ bid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19045]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 14746
Joined: 2010
|
With the $$ Wake has made from ACC distribution of Clemson earnings
Sep 18, 2024, 6:38 PM
|
|
Wake just does not need additional revenue (and a beatdown loss). That simple.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 31
| visibility 3710
|
|
|
|
50
