Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Had this discussion with some Nole friends of mine.
Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic
Replies: 16
| visibility 3708

Had this discussion with some Nole friends of mine.

24

Feb 10, 2025, 12:02 PM
Reply

Topic was the direction college football is heading. Talking about players becoming professional, House settlement, academics becoming less and less important, etc.

We talked about how for the past several years schools are becoming less and less concerned about academics, letting players transfer in with no concern for normal transfer protocols, hiring one year mercenaries, etc. we talked about how the solution was to become an NFL model, players would become employees, salaries would be determined by collective bargaining, etc.

I made this comment, "When Clemson win the national championship in 2025 will that be the last national championship won by a team where the players actually take classes and get real degrees?"

2025 free_orange level membertnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Had this discussion with some Nole friends of mine.

5

Feb 10, 2025, 12:21 PM
Reply

Valid point.

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Had this discussion with some Nole friends of mine.

3

Feb 10, 2025, 12:46 PM
Reply

$$$$$ rules!!!

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


No, not really. Theres no direct correlation between money and winning.***

1
1

Feb 10, 2025, 12:55 PM
Reply



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: No, not really. Theres no direct correlation between money and winning.***

3

Feb 10, 2025, 3:25 PM
Reply

There was a correlation this past year. The team that spent the most money on their roster won the National Championship. How is that not a correlation?

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Here are the top 10 funded programs since 2005 -


Feb 10, 2025, 9:45 PM
Reply

1. OREGON DUCKS ($969 MILLION)
2. TEXAS A&M AGGIES ($849 MILLION)
3. TEXAS LONGHORNS ($766 MILLION)
4. FLORIDA GATORS ($763 MILLION)
5. GEORGIA BULLDOGS ($716 MILLION)
6. OKLAHOMA ST COWBOYS ($670 MILLION)
7. LSU TIGERS ($618 MILLION)
8. OKLAHOMA SOONERS ($597 MILLION)
9. AUBURN TIGERS ($580 MILLION)
10. FLORIDA STATE SEMINOLES ($540 MILLION)

Only TWO of these most-funded teams made the playoffs.

Here are the rest of the top 50. It clearly shows that having the most money doesn’t equate to wins.

50. Memphis Tigers: $170 million

49. Maryland Terrapins: $194 million

48. Minnesota Golden Gophers: $199 million

47. Oregon State Beavers: $201 million

46. Colorado Buffaloes: $208 million

45. NC State Wolfpack: $216 million

44. Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets: $220 million

43. UCLA Bruins: $233 million

42. Nebraska Cornhuskers: $236 million

41. Iowa State Cyclones: $249 million

40. Arizona State Sun Devils: $265 million

39. Mississippi State Bulldogs: $273 million

38. California Golden Bears: $283 million

37. Purdue Boilermakers: $289 million

36. Kentucky Wildcats: $302 million

35. Ole Miss Rebels: $310 million

34. Virginia Tech Hokies: $319 million

33t. Kansas State Wildcats: $324 million

33t. Arkansas Razorbacks: $324 million

31. Mizzou Tigers: $344 million

30. North Carolina Tar Heels: $344 million

29. Arizona Wildcats: $346 million

28. Indiana Hoosiers: $351 million

27. West Virginia Mountaineers: $354 million

26. Illinois Fighting Illini: $373 million

25. Penn State Nittany Lions: $386 million

24. Wisconsin Badgers: $389 million

23. Texas Tech Red Raiders: $396 million

22. Washington Huskies: $402 million

21. Michigan State Spartans: $439 million

20. Louisville Cardinals: $450 million

19. Kansas Jayhawks: $459 million

18. South Carolina Gamecocks: $466 million

17. Clemson Tigers: $476 million

16. Iowa Hawkeyes: $477 million

15. Michigan Wolverines: $493 million

14. Tennessee Volunteers: $500 million

13. Virginia Cavaliers: $516 million

12. Alabama Crimson Tide: $528 million

11. Ohio State Buckeyes: $536 million

As you can see, lots of teams with tons of cash don’t even make the playoffs. A correlation is defined as the process of establishing a relationship or connection between two or more measures. Based on the data above, there’s no correlation between funding and winning.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

The dude said, *$$$$$ rules*


Feb 10, 2025, 9:50 PM [ in reply to Re: No, not really. Theres no direct correlation between money and winning.*** ]
Reply

The data shows that’s just not true. It doesn’t rule. It may help, but when only two of the top 10 funded programs make the playoffs it shows it doesn’t “rule”.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: The dude said, *$$$$$ rules*

1

Feb 10, 2025, 10:39 PM
Reply


The data shows that’s just not true. It doesn’t rule. It may help, but when only two of the top 10 funded programs make the playoffs it shows it doesn’t “rule”.


When the writer said only 2 made the play-off, was he only talking about this year?
Texas, Oregon and UGA made it this year, from his top 10 spenders.

If he was talking about multiple years of CFP (play-offs), he would have to add Okla, and perhaps others.

The consensus seems to be that THE Ohio State University was easily the BIG SPENDER for the most-recent season! And money talked.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Youre right it was 3


Feb 11, 2025, 12:15 AM
Reply

Point stands, 3 of the top 10 funded programs (since 2005) have EVER made the playoffs. Yeah, Ohio State spent $20M in NIL, but this single data point doesn’t conclude NIL is the reason they won. It’s definitely not enough data to say “$$$$$ rules”. It’s one data point compared to almost 20 years of funding. Did I mention only 3 of the top 10 funded programs have ever made the playoffs? 🙂

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Only 3 of the top 10 funded programs since 2005


Feb 10, 2025, 10:25 PM [ in reply to Re: No, not really. Theres no direct correlation between money and winning.*** ]
Reply

have EVER made the playoffs.

3.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Had this discussion with some Nole friends of mine.

4

Feb 10, 2025, 12:52 PM
Reply

Hope you are right that we do win it in 2025. I have always thought you seemed smart and insightful :)

2025 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Had this discussion with some Nole friends of mine.

1

Feb 10, 2025, 2:07 PM
Reply

I hope you are semi-right. I would like the last 5 National Championships at Clemson from 2025-2029 be by academically sound teams. We can dream can't we Bret?

2025 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Had this discussion with some Nole friends of mine.

1

Feb 10, 2025, 2:15 PM
Reply

Was this over brunch?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Had this discussion with some Nole friends of mine.

2

Feb 10, 2025, 5:31 PM
Reply

I don’t like to give Ohio State credit for anything but their past year’s football graduation rate was 94%. It sounds good to claim we might be the only program left that can do both but I don’t really believe that.


Message was edited by: slwcu79®


2025 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I believe a lot of players will be concerned with their education.


Feb 10, 2025, 5:45 PM
Reply

A very small percent of college players will play on Sundays. That great percentage which doesn't make the cut realize that the opportunity for future opportunities are found in education.

I won't depart from the term 'student athlete,' over the few who are sure they are NFL bound.

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Had this discussion with some Nole friends of mine.

3

Feb 10, 2025, 6:28 PM
Reply

Around me, there are UT, TAMU, OU, LSU & BAMA fans. They ALL say the same thing. They’re less interested……and so am I.

Who can buy the best team, IS NOT interesting. The richest can buy the best team. Don’t need to watch to know that.

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Had this discussion with some Nole friends of mine.


Feb 10, 2025, 6:47 PM
Reply

Yep that is it in a nutshell for myself.

About like what the Dodgers are doing in MLB.

2025 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

MEG


Replies: 16
| visibility 3708
Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic