Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
search
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!
W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000
YOUR BALANCE
Comment on GT structure - there is no perfect D scheme
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 2
| visibility 649

Comment on GT structure - there is no perfect D scheme


Sep 19, 2021, 9:53 AM

They were in cloud coverage, which they hadn’t shown. Caught us off guard. However, two vulnerabilities -
1) inside run
2) flood concepts

Clearly 1) was done with heavy doses of Shipley and the the QB run game. Why not run some basic flood concepts? Should essentially have a man free and our scheme is easily amenable.

Not a coach and I know there is probably more nuance. But it does seem odd that it seems like the chess game is a single move on Offense. They came out with an opening move and we didn’t move our chess pieces to force them into the next move.

Oh well - I hope these are just growing pains (for a collective of people including players/coaches) with teams throwing the kitchen sink on D. Seems like this happened back in 2016 early in the year with Watson.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Comment on GT structure - there is no perfect D scheme


Sep 19, 2021, 10:08 AM

Let me propose an honest question: Do you think the GT "Structure" would have stopped Bama or Okla. from going deep? NOT!! That entire interview by Elliott was a load of hogwash and excuses.

2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Comment on GT structure - there is no perfect D scheme


Sep 19, 2021, 10:16 AM

There is usually a CB that has a deep portion of the field. You can put your fastest guy in the slot and make a bet that he’ll beat that DB to the back corner. That’s essentially a personnel matchup. Apparently Ladson has some serious wheels, so that could’ve been tried too.

Just to say, OU and/or Bama and the like might have just trusted the personnel matchup and pushed it down the field with the right personnel on the field.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 2
| visibility 649
Popular Board Posts
📰 E-Mail News Alerts

TigerBoard POTD

I feel as though I owe each of you an explanation....

by BengalBen®

Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic